Before leaving...

Thanks for your visite. If you like my work, you can support me with the following possibilities:
Subscribe to my YouTube channel
I post full test videos every month. By subscribing you will be notified of each new video, but the number of YouTube subscribers is important to obtain products to test.


Subscribe to my page on Facebook
I regularly post updates on Facebook, I also organize contests to win prizes. Here too, the number of fans is important to obtain material.


Use my links
I don't display ads on my site because I don't like it. My only source is from purchases you make from my links. I earn a meager commission on every purchase (about 2% on average), it costs you nothing and keeps me going. Here are some links to buy your products: == Aliexpress == Banggood

On this page:
Test video
Price Redmi Note 11
First configuration
CPU / GPU Performance
Benchmark Antutu/3DMark
Network performance
Wifi performance
GPS performance
Battery range
Photo camera test
Photo quality
Video quality
External audio quality
Audio quality (headphones)
Screen quality
Operating system
Test / Review conclusion
Questions answers

Follow me: rss feed
Receive notifications for new articles

Redmi Note 11 : test / review

Redmi Note 11 : test / review (limited offer at 159€!)
Category: Smartphones

I've been testing the Redmi range since the Redmi Note 5, so I've tested a lot of them since that first phone. The Redmi Note range seems to have a cycle where one generation seems like just a slight evolution from the next generation and sometimes the Redmi Note range takes a bigger leap forward. The previous model, the Redmi Note 10, took a big leap forward by setting the bar really high compared to the competition. This Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 should therefore be a slight evolution but a slight evolution is not necessarily a negative thing because Xiaomi has so far always managed to do better than the others with a lower price. [b][b][b][b]

Test video

If you prefer the video format, I made a video which broadly summarizes the content of this test: [b][b][b]linkManufacturer web site:[b][b][b]linkSite where I have bought the Redmi Note 11:[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]

Structure of my tests

I test the phones according to a pre-established structure (see below) to provide you with as much information as possible. Unfortunately, this takes a long time. Some tests like network performance tests take several days and for photo tests I sometimes have to wait until the weather is suitable to take pictures in good conditions. I am therefore obliged to publish the tests step by step, so I invite you to come back if the test is not complete at the time of your visit.[b]
How are my tests different from others on the web?

- I usually buy the devices with my own money, so price is just as important as you are!
- I keep the devices for at least a few weeks (sometimes more) to see what they are worth in real conditions.
- I answer (when possible) your questions to help you decide before you buy
- no one pays me to do these reviews, so I'm completely neutral and independent...
- My pages are not filled with ads

POCO F5 : test / review
Unihertz Luna : test / review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: test / review
Redmi Note 11 : test / review
Redmi Note 11 Pro test / review
Redmi 10A: test and review
POCO M5 : test, review and price
POCO X5 5G : test / review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12: test / review
Unihertz Tank : test / review

Price Redmi Note 11

The list below shows the prices for the Redmi Note 11 from more than 50 sites around the world. If you are not satisfied with any price, you can subscribe to a price alert to be the first to be notified when the price drops.[b]bb
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G Unlocked 6GB RAM + 128GB ROM STAR BLUE...
2023-09-24 14:03
122 EUR
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 - Smartphone 4+128GB, 6.43 Pulgadas 90Hz FHD+ Amoled Dotdisplay, Snapdragon 680...
2023-09-24 18:55
131 EUR
Xiaomi Smartphone Redmi Note 11 6,5" Octa Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB Gris 4 GB RAM 64 GB...
2023-09-24 18:06
138 EUR
Xiaomi Redmi 12C Smartphone, MediaTek Helio G85, Pantalla HD+ de 6,71", Cámara Dual de 50MP con IA,...
2023-09-23 07:30
139 EUR
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 - Smartphone 4+128GB, Display AMOLED FHD+ 6.43” 90Hz, Snapdragon 680, quadrup...
2023-09-24 14:54
140 EUR
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Dual SIM 4GB RAM 64 GB grau Smartphone Handy NEU...
2023-09-24 14:15
141 EUR
helpThe above links are affiliate links from companies such as Amazon, Gearbest, Aliexpress,... If you appreciate my work, I would be grateful if you could purchase these products through these links. It costs you absolutely nothing but I get a small commission that allows me to buy the material I test. Thank you very much!


January 19, 2022: reception of the phone in preview [b] January 26, 2022: official launch of the Redmi Note 11 [b][b]

Why this phone?

I systematically test all Redmi Note because when testing phones, this product range is one of the products that you absolutely have to test. Each generation of Redmi sells millions of copies and sometimes Xiaomi manages to sell a few million copies in a few hours. This is probably also the case for some new Samsung or Apple models, but the huge advantage of the Redmi is the price. [b][b] Xiaomi has tested many things with the Redmi over time, going from a very basic design to sometimes more fanciful choices like the Redmi Note 9, the Redmi Note 11 rather plays in an elegant sobriety giving itself a mid-range air without blowing up the price. Xiaomi has made technical choices that surprise me a little for this new model and in a global context where a shortage of certain components is driving up prices, the Redmi Note 11 will undoubtedly find its place thanks to its price rather than its novelties from a technical point of view.[b]


The packaging of the Redmi Note 11 follows the same trend as all the brand's phones, the boxes are almost all the same size and all contain the same thing. The box contains the phone, a transparent silicone protective shell, a manual, a needle for the sim drawer, a charger and a USB type C cable. [b]
Length : 159.9
Width : 73.9
Thickness : 8.1
Weight : 179
Jack output : Yes
USB Type : Type C
Infrared port : Yes

First configuration

Setting up a phone is not exciting, often just follow the instructions and in a few minutes at most your phone is ready to use. The first surprise with this phone is to see MIUI 13 appear from the start. This is the first phone running MIUI 13 that I've tested. The configuration of the phone is no different from MIUI 12.5, I didn't really notice any difference, Xiaomi tried to replace all Google screens with a more graphical interface. Xiaomi also goes a step further by trying every time to trick you into using their cloud service and with every generation they find new tricks for you to sign up. It doesn't matter, the Xiaomi cloud is a good product, it's just that I don't need it because I already have a cloud at Google and Amazon.[b][b]


As I wrote above, this 11th generation is moving towards a sober and elegant design. I tested the gray/charcoal version and although this phone is mostly made of plastic, this kind of color gives it a bit of a metallic look. The texture is a bit matte and unlike glass surfaces, fingerprints are less noticeable and the phone is less slippery. [b][b]
The screen occupies approximately 83% of the available space, which is an average occupation rate. The selfie sensor is located in the middle of the screen, it is neither big nor small, it is average. Bezels are visible all around the screen but it's the same as on most phones in this price range. [b][b]
The volume and ignition buttons are on the right edge in a fairly usual place, the ignition button is also used to unlock the phone thanks to its sensor footprint. The buttons are quite discreet and also very thin. [b][b]
Above there is an audio jack connector, a speaker, an infrared transmitter and a sound sensor. [b][b]
Below we find a very classic configuration with the USB type C port, a loudspeaker and another sensor for the sound. [b][b]
The sim drawer is on the left and you have to push the needle far enough to open it. I also thought that I had gone too far but it is because of the length of the sim drawer that you have to go so far, this one can accommodate two sim cards and a memory card. [b][b]
The photo block stands out a bit but I find that the Redmi range has improved on this side because on previous generations, the optical block was much more visible in back. [b][b] I find that this Redmi Note 11 has a good level of finish despite the use of plastic, the design is quite sober and elegant. The gray color gives it a more metallic look and its texture gives it a good grip.[b]


[b]The information below comes from the Device Info HW application. The application provides detailed technical information about the tested phone. The Redmi Note 11 exists in several versions and the first to be marketed is the Chinese version. The characteristics of the Chinese version are very close to those of the Poco M4 Pro, so I expected to find the same characteristics in this Redmi Note 11 in the global version, but that is not the case at all. I'm also afraid that this will confuse the potential buyer because even if these phones have the same name, they are quite different products. The version I tested is therefore a Redmi Note 11 in global version which runs on a Qualcomm architecture. [b][b] The Redmi is equipped with a Snapdragon 680 processor which offers slightly lower entry-level performance than the previous range. Buyers of this kind of product are probably not looking for performance, but taking a step back is not in Xiaomi's habits. This processor is accompanied by an Adreno 610 GPU which is also necessarily at the entry level. [b][b] This Qualcomm architecture also includes the use of a Snapdragon X11 modem interface which is limited to 4G and offers a download speed of 390 Mbps (with 150 Mbps upload). I assume that a 5G version will be released later as was the case for the previous generation. [b][b] For wifi I find the WCN3990 chip which is also used on higher end models, so wifi performance is probably going to be good. [b][b][b][b][b]

CPU / GPU Performance

CPU : Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
GPU : AdreNo 610
Memory (RAM) : 4 - 6 Gb
Storage : 128 Gb
[b][b]As I described in the previous paragraph, this phone is equipped with a Snapdragon 680 and an Adreno 610. These are entry-level components that have their place in this kind of phone, so do not here look for performance. It is especially the games that will be impacted by this choice because for everyday use, this level of performance is quite sufficient.[b]

Benchmark Antutu/3DMark

I got a score of 233,000 points with Antutu, I got a score of 225,000 points with the previous generation. The gain in performance is therefore not really visible but it is possible that this processor is more energy efficient, this will be seen in the battery tests. This score shows that it is with memory that this model stands out from its predecessor with 67,000 points where I had obtained 48,000 points with the Redmi Note 10. [b][b] Performance n t has ever been the trump card of the Redmi Note range, those looking for performance in the same price range should look to the Poco brand. This lack of performance is however quite relative because the Redmi Note 11 will perfectly meet the needs of a population looking for a phone that is not too expensive, competitors are not doing better anyway. [b][b] The phone's temperature only rose by 2.9°C during the Antutu test, so the processor does not seem to heat up very much and/or the heat dissipation is doing its job properly. [b][b][b]
Antutu score : 233020
Antutu CPU : 84551
Antutu GPU : 39869
Antutu UX : 41521
Antutu Mem : 67079
[b]Top 10 - performance ranking based on Antutu
1. Poco F5 - 910362
2. Poco F4 Gt - 853016
3. Realme Gt - 811858
4. Black Shark 4 Pro - 759986
5. Poco X4 Gt - 714577
6. Oppo Find X2 Pro - 605184
7. Oneplus 8t - 595000
8. Poco F3 - 589677
9. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro - 581650
10. Oneplus 8 Pro - 579417

Number of smartphones in the ranking:155
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:74/155

Note: this ranking only contains the phones I tested as well as a few others that I added for reference.
[b]Gaming[b]To test the performance in game, I download the mobile PUBG game and evaluate the in-game experience, graphics level and depth of vision. This game is quite demanding and should help you evaluating the performance of a phone.Not yet available / tested[b][b][b][b]

Network performance

As I wrote above, this version of the Redmi Note 11 is limited to 4G. There are other versions of this Redmi Note 11, so you must check which one it is before buying. This version uses the code name "2201117TG".[b]
3G frequencies : B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B6 (800), B8 (900), B19 (800), B34 (TD 2000), B39 (TD 1900+)
4G frequencies : B1 (2100), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B34 (TDD 2100), B38 (TDD 2600), B39 (TDD 1900), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500)
Volte : Yes
NFC : Yes
Number measurements : 1223
Average signal (reference) : -92.5
Average signal (telephone) : -91.32
Average deviation reference/telephone : 1.18
Min/Max signal (reference) : -92/-97
Min/Max signal (phone) : -90 / -93
Choose your country to check if your phone is compatible:

The frequencies displayed below will allow you to see if this phone is compatible with your operator or if you will be able to use it in the country where you are going on vacation.

Signal 4G (from December 2020)[b]I decided to change the methodology for measuring the network because I noticed that the configuration of the mobile network changes over time. This makes it more difficult to compare phones because the conditions are no longer exactly the same.[b][b]To overcome this problem, I set up a device that captures 24 hours a day about ten parameters from the mobile network (ex: cell id, rssi, rsrq, snr, frequency,...). I then place the phone next to the device for 24 to 48 hours taking the same measurements so that I can compare them. [b][b] Overview of the phones tested with this methodology[b][b]
Phone tested:MeasurementsAvg signal (reference)Avg signal (phone)Min/Max (reference)Min/Max (phone)
Samsung Galaxy S10+457-93.06-97.39-89 / -98-97 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro669-93.69-95.84-90 / -95-92 / -98
Poco F2 Pro1438-91.02-94.99-89 / -94-94 / -96
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g1645-90.77-95.02- 88 / -98-95 / -100
Poco X3821-94.89-103.19-91 / -97.7-101 / -104
Umidigi Bison2343-92.71-96.46-90 / -99-94 / -102
Oukitel C211101-92.04-94.99-90 / -97-92 / -95
Poco M31116-92.09-91.74-88 / -98-90 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro1071-90.61-94.03-88 / -94-94 / -96
Umidigi A9 Pro981-90.40-94.01-88 / -95-93 / -95
Redmi Note 9t1201-92.149-91.71-90 / -97-91 / -97
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10999-92.35-93.99-88 / -97-92 / -98
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro877-89.72-90.56- 88 / -92-89 / -95
Poco X3 Pro1876-91.45-92.91-90 / -94-90 / -96
Poco F31382-90.79-94.2-89 / -94-93 / -98
Oneplus Nord N100896-91.23-96.005-88 / - 99-96 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite2875-91.36-91.49-87 / -96-90 / -96
Samsung Galaxy A521427-89.27-93.39-87 / -98-92 / -96
Doogee S96 Pro1259-94.2-91.21-90 / -102-88 / -95
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s957-92.07-97.62-90 / -102-96 / -102
Poco M3 Pro1247-91.76-102.97-99 / -104-88 / -98
Realme Gt843-96.49-94.02-93 / -101- 92 / -96
F150 R20221002-92.4-105.1-90 / -97-98 / -110
Umidigi Bison Pro936-94.2-104.98-91 / -98-95 / -105
Redmi 102141-94.74-100.92-92 / -98-99 / -101
Tcl 10 Pro871-93.43-94.001-92 / -96-93 / -95
Poco M4 Pro570-93.71-96.78-91 / -98-95 / -99
Google Pixel 51444-91.02-97.02-90 / -94-97 / -101
Xiaomi 11t1576-92.305-92.003-90 / -96-92 / -93
Redmi Note 111223-92.5-91.32-92/-97-90 / -93
Black Shark 4 Pro2383-95.178-95.42-90 / -100-93 / -101
Redmi Note 11 Pro349-95.33-93-89 / -101-92 / -94
Poco M4 Pro 4g1202-90.85-88.95-87 / - 95-88 / -98
Tcl 30 Se567-92.11-92.85-88 / -98-99 / -93
Poco X4 Pro562-92.06-94.01-90 / -95-95 / -93
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g945-93.5-93.54-91 / -97-92 / -97
Poco F4 Gt832-95.02-93.09-90 / -99 -93 / -97
Oukitel Wp181351-95.94-92.92-91 / -97-92 / -97
Poco X4 Gt387-96.99-96.505-96 / -98-95 / -98
Poco F4524-95.78-95.04-93 / -99-94/-96
Oneplus Nord 2t1340-98.83-96.305-95 / -102-90 / -99
Redmi 10a707-89.026-97.97-87 / -91-97 / -103
Poco M5762-95.18-95.07-98 / -93-99 / -94
Unihertz Tank1426-91.21-93.97-90 / -95-89 / -96
Poco X5 5g2234-92.3-99.1-91 / -95- 100 / -98
Google Pixel 6a853-91.8-95-90 / -94-95 / -97
Redmi Note 121023-89.6-96.99-88 / -93-95 / -97
Redmi Note 12 Pro1576-91.96-94.93-89 / -96-93 / -95
Unihertz Luna1133-91.7-91.94-89 / -95-92 / -94
Poco F51321-91.69-95.05-90 / -97-94 / -97
[b][b]I measured the sensitivity to the 4G network by performing more than 1200 measurements. I got an excellent signal of -91.32 dBm with the Redmi Note 11 where my probe got an average signal of -92.5 dBm. The difference isn't big but I haven't tested many phones that can do better than the probe, so that's a pretty good result. I'm a bit amazed as this phone probably uses a Snapdragon X11 modem like the Poco M3 Pro and OnePlus Nord N100, I had gotten pretty average results with both of these phones. We see on the following graph that the Redmi dominates the probe on 100% of the measurements.
[b][b][b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the download speed, I have identified some 4G cells offering good performance where I test all my devices several times to see what download and upload speed they can achieve.[b]Top 10 - speed ranking in download
1. Samsung Galaxy S20 D:351Mbps U: 20Mbps
2. Poco X3 D:232Mbps U: 55Mbps
3. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g D:223Mbps U: 52Mbps
4. Poco F2 Pro D:207Mbps U: 53Mbps
5. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite D:153Mbps U: 68Mbps
6. Xiaomi Mi A3 D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
8. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite D:149Mbps U: 60Mbps
9. Samsung Galaxy A21s D:147Mbps U: 51Mbps
10. Huawei Y6 2019 D:145Mbps U: 61Mbps

Number of smartphones in the ranking:30
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/30

Note: the theoretical maximum speed of a telephone is often limited by the configuration of the mobile network and the congestion of the network at the time of the measurement. So maybe you could get a higher speed on another network

Wifi performance

To test a phone's ability to receive the network properly, I take measurements near my router and then remotely (and always at the same place). This gives me an average in dBm where a value of -90 dBm indicates poorer performance than a value at -30 dBm.[b]
Wifi frequencies : 802.11a , 802.11b , 802.11g , 802.11n , 802.11n 5GHz , 802.11ac
Signal / close : -18
Signal / distant : -63
Wifi signal[b]This phone is equipped with a wifi chip that I have tested in other phones that have delivered good results, this is also the case for this phone. I got an average signal of -18dBm near the router and -63dBm at a distance. I also measured the signal stability by putting the phone on my router and I get a signal level below -10dBm (that's an excellent score) and the signal remains perfectly stable.[b][b]Top 10 - wifi sensitivity ranking
1. Poco F2 Pro -11dBm
2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro -12dBm
3. Realme Gt -12dBm
4. Redmi Note 12 Pro -13dBm
5. Samsung Galaxy A21s -13dBm
6. Redmi Note 11 Pro -13dBm
7. Poco F5 -14dBm
8. Oneplus Nord N100 -15dBm
9. Poco X3 Pro -15dBm
10. Poco F3 -15dBm

Number of smartphones in the ranking:74
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:25/74

[b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the speed in Wifi, I connect to my router in 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz (if available) and use the Ookla application to measure the speed.[b]Top 10 - wifi download speed ranking
1. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 866Mbps
2. Redmi Note 12 Pro 866Mbps
3. Poco F4 866Mbps
4. Google Pixel 6a 866Mbps
5. Poco F4 Gt 866Mbps
6. Poco X4 Gt 866Mbps
7. Oneplus Nord 2t 866Mbps
8. Black Shark 4 Pro 866Mbps
9. Poco F5 866Mbps
10. Poco M4 Pro 4g 433Mbps

Number of smartphones in the ranking:72
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/72

Note: I have a 400Mbps line and a modem capable of delivering higher speed, but I can never be sure how much bandwidth is available when doing a test.

GPS performance

[b]To test the accuracy of the GPS signal, I use two positioning applications to evaluate the difference between the actual position and the position indicated by the phone. This test is done outdoors with nothing to obstruct the signal. An accuracy level of up to 3 meters can easily be corrected by an application (e.g. Google Maps).[b][b] The Redmi Note 11 is equipped with a Qualcomm GPS chip and as usual with this kind of chip I get an accuracy of 3 meters outdoors, I have never succeeded to get a better score. This level of precision is sufficient to allow correct localization with a navigation application like Google Maps, the application can apply corrections to locate you in the right place. The first fix of the GPS on the other hand was rather long but once having passed this stage, I did not have to wait any more.[b][b]Top 10 - GPS accuracy ranking
1. Poco M5 1m
2. Poco X4 Gt 1m
3. Unihertz Tank 1m
4. Oukitel C21 1m
5. Redmi 9a 1m
6. Redmi 10a 1m
7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 1m
8. Doogee S96 Pro 1m
9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1m
10. Umidigi Bison Pro 1m

Number of smartphones in the ranking:44
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/44

Note: An accuracy of 3 meters or less can easily be corrected by a good GPS application. Phone performance also plays a role in how fast your display updates, so good accuracy could be compromised by too slow a display.

Battery range

To test battery life I developed an application that measures the battery level minute by minute until the battery is empty. This application consumes about ten percent of the phone's resources and I do a test with 100 brightness. This test aims to reproduce a contemplative use of a phone (e.g. surfing the internet, reading articles, spending time on social networks). These results are not valid for intensive gaming/streaming use.
Capacity : 5000
Fast charge : Yes
W max : 33
Range (100% brightness) : 592.00
Range (50% brightness) : 1 376.00
Charging time : 69.00
Discharge speed (100%) : 0.17
Discharge score (100%) : 8.45
Discharge speed (50%) : 0.07
Discharge score (50%) : 3.63
Charging speed : 1.45
Charging score : 72.46
From March 2020, I replaced my subjective battery test with a technical test to better measure the real behaviour of the battery. Now I test the autonomy and charging time under absolutely identical conditions. I perform several measurements, so this test alone takes several days during which I cannot use the phone for anything else.

Battery life - methodology
To test the battery life, I measure the battery consumption every minute in strictly identical conditions to be able to compare phones and also to allow you to evaluate your phone in the same conditions. I rule out any influence of applications that could interfere with the measurement. The autonomy is not linear, the battery sometimes discharges much faster at the end. This is a frustrating phenomenon but with my measurements, you will know if you need to find a charger quickly.

Battery life
The battery of the Redmi Note 11 has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has discharged from 100% to 1% in 592.00 minutes with 100% brightness, it has discharged from 100% to 1% in 1 376.00 minutes with 50% brightness. I obtain in this way an average discharge speed of 0.17% per minute with 100% luminosity and 0.07% per minute with 50% luminosity, the consumption is therefore 8.45 mA per minute with 100% luminosity and 3.63 with 50% luminosity. To be able to compare the efficiency of the phone and its influence on the battery, you have to compare the 8.45 (or 50%) score with that of other smartphones, the figure should be as low as possible.

Charging time - methodology
To test the charging time, I always use the same charger with the same cable. I measure the charging time minute by minute to see the evolution of the charge as well as the charging speed. The charging speed of a battery is not linear, it is often faster at the beginning and slower at the end. The charger is compatible with fast charging.

Charging time
The battery of the Redmi Note 11 has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has been charged from 1% to 100% in 69.00 minutes. This gives me an average charging speed of 1.45% per minute and therefore an increase of 72.46 mA per minute. To compare the performance of the Redmi Note 11 compared to other phones, you should use the 72.46 per minute score, this score should be as high as possible.

Important note: the charging speed is not always linear, the graph below gives you an indication of the battery behaviour.

The following table lists the phones tested with the technical battery test, they are ranked in order of efficiency. A higher battery capacity should logically result in a higher battery life but it is not always the case and it does not give any indication of the efficiency of a phone.

SmartphoneCapacity (mAh)Battery life (minutes)Efficiency ScoreBattery life (minutes) / 50%Efficiency Score / 50%Charging time.Score charging
Honor 9x4000770.005.191333.003.00151.0026.49
Nokia 5.34000549.007.291096.003.65199.0020.10
Samsung Galaxy S204000565.007.081217.003.29136.0029.41
Oukitel C214000497.008.051324.003.02167.0023.95
Google Pixel 54080773.005.281559.002.6281.0050.37
Umidigi A9 Pro4150552.007.521562.002.66112.0037.05
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g4160749.005.551541.002.70163.0025.52
Realme 64300704.006.111104.003.89162.0026.54
Google Pixel 6a44105348.2619352.2811139.73
Samsung Galaxy A524500652.006.901239.003.63165.0027.27
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g4500525.008.5712113.7224187.50
Realme Gt4500574.007.841057.004.2687.0051.72
Tcl 10 Pro4500465.009.68889.005.06133.0033.83
Poco F44500554.008.1211413.949845.92
Black Shark 4 Pro4500425.0010.59937.004.8029.00155.17
Oneplus Nord 2t45006936.4914923.0212137.19
Poco F34520657.006.881840.002.46122.0037.05
Poco F4 Gt4700365.0012.8810824.3438123.68
Poco F2 Pro47001150.004.091536.003.06180.0026.11
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s5000636.007.861556.003.21161.0031.06
Poco M3 Pro5000657.007.611647.003.04131.0038.17
Poco X4 Pro5000643.007.7813613.677467.57
Umidigi Bison Pro5000610.008.201632.003.06255.0019.61
Redmi 105000664.007.531684.002.97165.0030.30
Poco M4 Pro5000634.007.891600.003.13123.0040.65
Xiaomi 11t5000476.0010.501204.004.1597.0051.55
Redmi Note 115000592.008.451 376.003.6369.0072.46
Oneplus Nord N1005000808.006.191278.003.91663.007.54
Xiaomi Redmi Note 105000691.007.241728.002.89193.0025.91
Poco X5 5g500049310.1410584.7322821.93
Motorola G8 Power5000912.005.482792.001.79311.0016.08
Redmi Note 12 Pro50006188.0912943.8612041.67
Redmi Note 1250006377.8515173.308161.73
Samsung Galaxy A21s5000729.006.861283.003.90166.0030.12
Redmi Note 9t5000766.006.532054.002.43148.0033.78
Redmi 9a5000694.007.201902.002.63195.0025.64
Redmi 9c5000656.007.621915.002.61170.0029.41
Redmi 10a50006827.3318202.7516330.67
Umidigi Bison5000550.009.091471.003.40238.0021.01
Tcl 30 Se50006507.691 225.004.0817229.07
Poco M4 Pro 4g5000723.006.921 500.003.3377.0064.94
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro5020625.008.031557.003.22213.0023.57
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s5020663.007.571876.002.68224.0022.41
Xiaomi Redmi Note 95020650.007.721808.002.78162.0030.99
Poco X4 Gt5080726.007.0015383.3011344.96
Umidigi F25150927.005.561854.002.78299.0017.22
Poco X35160653.007.901654.003.12181.0028.51
Poco X3 Pro5160648.007.961688.003.06138.0037.39
Doogee S58 Pro5180845.006.131908.002.71177.0029.27
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite5260827.006.361609.003.27208.0025.29
Ulefone Armor 7e5500768.007.161140.004.82179.0030.73
Poco M36000842.007.131898.003.16217.0027.65
Doogee S96 Pro6350929.006.841405.004.52424.0014.98
F150 R20228300879.009.441498.005.54243.0034.16
Oukitel Wp18125002 733.004.5728594.3736234.53

helpHow to read these figures?
The battery capacity is an important element in determining the autonomy of a phone but it is not the only factor. A phone with a large battery may have a shorter battery life if it consumes more power. If I had to take an example from everyday life, I would use the universe of the car. If a car has a large fuel tank, it should be able to drive a longer distance unless its average fuel consumption is higher. The battery efficiency score works the same way, it should be as low as possible and represents the energy consumption of the phone. These differences in efficiency are often related to the brightness of the screen, large bright screens will tend to consume more energy and even if they have a large battery, their range will be shorter.

In summary I measured the charging time with a Ugreen 100W fast charger and it took me 69 minutes to charge the battery from 1 to 100%. The Redmi Note 11's 33W fast charge puts it among the fastest in this price range. On the following graph, we see that the loading speed is not at all linear, it only takes 12 minutes to load 20% but the last 20 percent takes 25 minutes. It is from 80% that the charge slows down sharply.
[b][b] With the screen brightness at 100% I got a battery life of 592 minutes, it's a battery life quite similar to the Poco M4 Pro and Redmi 10 which probably use the same battery. Consumption is fairly linear as can be seen in the following graph.
If I lower the brightness to 50%, the autonomy increases to 1376 minutes. It's a comfortable level of autonomy but is a little below the average for phones with the same battery capacity. The screen is therefore more demanding on this phone. [b]
[b][b] The autonomy of the Redmi Note 11 is therefore good without being extraordinary, the battery should last 2 days in normal use.[b]

Photo camera test

To test the quality of photos produced by a phone, I do a technical test (resolution, sharpness, chromatic aberration,...) in studio (identical conditions) to evaluate the technical part objectively. From the second half of 2020, I built my own laboratory to take completely objective technical measurements. I then take pictures in real conditions to see how the camera performs. I then evaluate these photos according to my criteria but I publish the photos so that you can evaluate the result according to your criteria.[b]


Selfie / resolution : 16
Selfie / sensor : Samsung S5K3l6
Resolution : 50
Sensor : Samsung S5KJN1
This phone is equipped with two Samsung sensors on the back, first there is the 50 million pixel Samsung S5KJN1 which I also find in the Redmi 10 or the Poco M4 Pro. There is also the 13 million pixel Samsung S5K3l6 for the ultra wide angle part and there are still three sensors for depth, portraits and macro (Omnivision and Galaxycore). [b][b] I tested the main Samsung sensor in two other phones and this type of sensor produces worse photos than the Sony sensor of the Redmi Note 10. The Samsung sensor is probably more compact than the Sony but this comes at the cost of quality. I don't know the ultra wide angle sensor used in this phone, so I'm curious to see what might have motivated Xiaomi to replace the Sony IMX 355 which did a good job in a large majority of their previous models.[b]

Photo quality

Photo quality (indoor/studio)[b]The studio test is carried out under the same conditions so that the results can be compared on an equal basis. I calibrate my lighting for each test to obtain the same brightness and colour temperature. This test is a preliminary analysis of the technical qualities of a camera. Most phones fail this test, so you should also read the results of the other tests in the following paragraphs.[b][b] Main sensor: Samsung S5KJN1
Most of the cameras I test in the studio produce photos that are too dark and this Samsung sensor is no exception to the rule. The problem can be solved by using the manual mode, sometimes it only takes one or two notches of exposure to find a good exposure. It's pretty much the same problem on all phones, so I won't dwell on that. The sharpness in the center is on the other hand quite good, the letters on the cube are perfectly legible at 100% and I don't see any trace of sharpening treatment. The colorimetry is influenced by the underexposure, the technical test should reveal if this is correct. I see some noise and traces of compression on the plain surfaces. [b][b]
In this photo, I have the impression that the colors are too warm, especially if we compare the same photo taken with the secondary sensor. The sharpness in the center is good, it allows to read the fine print of the Canadian note, the sharpness in the periphery decreases a little but it does not affect the quality of the image much. I also see here compression and noise when I zoom in beyond 100% but it is not visible when looking at the image on a small screen. [b][b] Secondary sensor: Samsung S5K3l6
This sensor is an ultra wide angle sensor and this can be seen in the significant distortion of the image for objects near the sensor. The photo is a little better exposed than with the main sensor but the sharpness on the other hand is much less good and this will also be seen in the next photo. Color processing seems more faithful than with the main sensor. [b][b]
My first impression on the colors seems to be confirmed with this new photo, the colorimetry seems more accurate with this sensor because the main sensor produces photos with a more pronounced yellow tint . The sharpness is less good, the small letters of the Canadian note are no longer readable, it is lost in a mush of pixels. Noise is also very present. This is unfortunately the case with all sensors of this type. [b][b][b][b]Photo: technical test[b]I was inspired by industrial technical tests to create my own technical test to evaluate the technical quality of a camera. This test is an objective assessment of a camera's ability to render a scene correctly. [b][b]I test the following elements:[b]- centre sharpness, peripheral sharpness[b]- colour fidelity based on 24 reference colours[b]- level of chromatic aberration[b]- dynamic range (ability to capture dark and light areas without loss)[b]- distortion[b][b]The technical evaluation may differ from the subjective evaluation as the feeling of a photo will be influenced by the processing provided by each manufacturer.[b][b] Main sensor: Samsung S5KJN1
Most of the cameras I test in the studio produce photos that are too dark and this Samsung sensor is no exception to the rule. The problem can be solved by using the manual mode, sometimes it only takes one or two notches of exposure to find a good exposure. It's pretty much the same problem on all phones, so I won't dwell on that. The sharpness in the center is on the other hand quite good, the letters on the cube are perfectly legible at 100% and I don't see any trace of sharpening treatment. The colorimetry is influenced by the underexposure, the technical test should reveal if this is correct. I see some noise and traces of compression on the plain surfaces. [b][b]
In this photo, I have the impression that the colors are too warm, especially if we compare the same photo taken with the secondary sensor. The sharpness in the center is good, it allows to read the fine print of the Canadian note, the sharpness in the periphery decreases a little but it does not affect the quality of the image much. I also see here compression and noise when I zoom in beyond 100% but it is not visible when looking at the image on a small screen. [b][b] Secondary sensor: Samsung S5K3l6
This sensor is an ultra wide angle sensor and this can be seen in the significant distortion of the image for objects near the sensor. The photo is a little better exposed than with the main sensor but the sharpness on the other hand is much less good and this will also be seen in the next photo. Color processing seems more faithful than with the main sensor. [b][b]
My first impression on the colors seems to be confirmed with this new photo, the colorimetry seems more accurate with this sensor because the main sensor produces photos with a more pronounced yellow tint . The sharpness is less good, the small letters of the Canadian note are no longer readable, it is lost in a mush of pixels. Noise is also very present. This is unfortunately the case with all sensors of this type. [b][b][b][b]Outdoor photo quality[b] Main sensor: Samsung S5KJN1 [b]
This outdoor photo test was taken around noon in January, the sky was slightly cloudy but the brightness was abundant, this are therefore good conditions for taking pictures. I first shot in auto mode without any assistance and then tested AI, HDR and pro modes to assess the differences. This first photo was taken without AI or HDR. The first thing that struck me was the blue saturation, the blue is very saturated and if I use the AI mode the result is even more pronounced. Aesthetically speaking, I find it quite pretty but this overabundance of blue does not reflect reality. The sharpness in the foreground is correct but there is a significant loss of detail in the background of the image. This is not seen on a phone screen. The light is warm, this corresponds to reality but this sensor has a tendency to produce warmer images even when the light does not lend itself to it. The dynamic range is average. [b][b] Here is an example with AI mode: [b]
With AI mode, the blue is further accentuated to the point of making the photo completely unrealistic, I do not recommend so not to use it. On the other hand, HDR makes it possible to recover shadow areas without doing too much damage. [b][b]
Here is another photo taken from another angle for the light, we see again a too pronounced blue. The sharpness on the periphery could have been a little more pronounced, the barks are not super detailed. [b][b] I cannot say that the quality of the photos produced by this sensor is bad, I just think that the quality has regressed a bit compared to the previous generation which used a Sony sensor. The difference won't be too noticeable if you don't zoom in, the most visible thing is the overabundance of blue. [b][b] Secondary sensor: Samsung S5K3l6 [b]
It's on this kind of landscape that the ultra-wide-angle sensor s expresses the best despite its technical weaknesses. There is no dominance of blue here, the colors look more natural than with the main sensor, but on the other hand the processing of the sky has completely lost control. The branches in contact with the sky are surrounded by a light blue ghostly halo. The sharpness is quite low and the photo is very noisy (despite the 50 ISO). [b][b] Here are some other photos that should allow you to form an opinion on the photo quality delivered by this phone: [b][b][b]Test photo / night[b]
Entry-level phones don't often produce good night shots but the Redmi range managed to surprise me as I had taken some great night shots with the Redmi Note 7. Things got worse. is unfortunately degraded over time because even with a night mode, the Redmi Note 11 cannot repeat the feat of the Redmi Note 7. The quality of night photos is quite average, digital noise is very present and too much smoothing causes many details to be lost. [b][b]
The ultra wide angle sensor doesn't do better but if I compare it to other sensors of this type, I find that it does better than average, the photos are not completely dark. On the other hand, the digital noise is very visible and the smoothing is too pronounced. [b][b]

Video quality

Stabilisation[b] The Redmi Note 11 is capable of shooting in 1080p and 60fps, the 4k option is not available. The stabilization is not very effective because the jolts of footsteps are not very well damped, the video goes a little in all directions. It's quite rare to find entry-level video stabilization, so this result doesn't surprise me.[b]Video normale conditions I made this video in 1080p and 60fps, the phone does not offer the possibility of filming in 4k, it's a shame because it affects the quality of the video. The fluidity of the video is good thanks to the 60fps but on the other hand the sharpness is not good if you watch it on a large screen. This is not seen on a phone screen but if you watch these videos on a pc screen with a good resolution, you will see that the video is very pixelated.[b]Video low light[b] The video made during the day had shown that the Redmi Note 11 did not offer spectacular sharpness for the video, it is even worse for the night where I feel like the focus fails to catch the decor. The video is pixelated from start to finish, digital noise is also very present. The Redmi Note 11 is therefore not a champion for night video/photography.[b]

External audio quality

[b]This test is intended to give you an overview of the volume and sound quality during calls and when listening to music through the external speakers. [b][b] Music with external speakers [b] The Redmi Note 11 produces a fairly fine sound in the treble, bass sounds are lacking on the other hand a bit of depth with the external speakers. The sound produced is a little more powerful than average. Sound quality during calls For calls, the Redmi produces a fairly high-pitched sound but allows for clear communication. Listening volume is higher than average. If I switch to loudspeaker mode, the volume is obviously higher and is a little above average, the sound is still high-pitched but not as much as with the main loudspeaker.[b]

Audio quality (headphones)

To test the quality of the phone's audio output, I connect the device's audio output to a measuring tool, then play sounds on all frequencies and measure the differences between the original sound and the sound produced by the phone. In this way I measure the phone's ability to correctly reproduce all sounds.[b]
Frequency Respons : +0.08 / -0.02
Noise Level : -92.9
Dynamic Range : 92.9
THD : 0.00209
Intermodulation : 0.015
Stereo crosstalk : -84.7
The sound produced by the jack output is of good quality, this telephone is capable of covering all frequencies without deviating too much from the norm. The frequency coverage is even better than on the Redmi Note 10s, it deviates from the reference in the treble but the difference is imperceptible. The power of the sound is average and the distortions are very low.[b]

Screen quality

To test the screen, I use a colorimetric probe that measures the color accuracy of a screen, as well as other parameters to see if a screen is able to correctly reproduce an image. I also test the brightness level to determine if the screen will be able to display an image in full sunlight.[b]
Screen size : 6.43
Resolution : 1080 x 2400
Ratio : 20:9
Type : Amoled
% occupancy : 84
dE white : 2.9
dE red : 0.5
dE green : 0.4
dE blue : 0.5
dE jaune : 1.1
dE cyan : 0.7
dE magenta : 0.3
White temperature : 6629
Contrast : 1000000:1
Brightness : 700
The screen of the Redmi Note 11 is not correctly calibrated out of the box, you have to change the color mode to standard color to obtain excellent colorimetry. After making this change I obtained a dE of 0.91, it is an excellent level of colorimetry which is worthy of high-end telephones. The temperature of the white is 6629k, which gives it a slight bluish appearance but almost invisible to the naked eye. [b][b][b][b]Top 10 - ranking of the best screens by colorimetry
1. Poco X4 Gt dE = 0.6
2. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g dE = 0.73
3. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro dE = 0.83
4. Redmi Note 11 dE = 0.91
5. Redmi Note 12 Pro dE = 0.97
6. Google Pixel 6a dE = 1.01
7. Google Pixel 5 dE = 1.11
8. Realme Gt dE = 1.17
9. Redmi Note 12 dE = 1.17
10. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite dE = 1.19

Number of smartphones in the ranking:75
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:4/75

Note: the colorimetric difference is measured in dE. After three, the human eye will perceive a colorimetric difference, so the dE should be the lowest. The tests were all carried out with a colorimetric probe.
[b]Brightness / Contrast[b]The contrast of the Redmi is almost infinite because it uses a good amoled screen, this gives excellent depth to the image. The brightness is around 400 cd/m² without assistance and if you use the sun mode, the brightness will be strong enough to read the screen under the sun. However, I noticed a high reflectivity of the screen (mirror effect).[b]


The fingerprint sensor is located on the ignition button, this sensor works very well and is quite fast. 2D facial recognition is also available, in principle it should work better under MIUI 13 but I did not notice a difference.[b]

Operating system

[b]The Redmi Note 11 is the first phone I've tested running MIUI 13, most phones from this brand I've tested recently were running MIUI 12.5. [b][b] What's new? [b] - performance improvement (+15% according to Xiaomi) [b] - new live wallpapers [b] - improved multitasking [b] - new features to protect your data [b] - new fonts [b] - document watermarking [b] - new widgets with extended compatibility for tablets running MIUI [b][b]

Encoutered bugs

Not yet available / tested[b][b]

Accessories Redmi Note 11

To better enjoy your experience with your smartphone, I offer links to all kinds of accessories that you might find useful

Protective cover / case redmi note 11
Screen protection film redmi note 11
Memory card redmi note 11
USB Cable / Charger redmi note 11
Headphones redmi note 11
Bike rack redmi note 11

Compare Redmi Note 11 with the others

I assigned a score of 1 to 10 for each test that determines the strengths and weaknesses of a product. I am using 0 for criteria that have not (yet) been tested. A score of 1 to 3 indicates poor performance (and yes, it does), a score of 4 to 6 indicates average performance, a score of 7 to 8 indicates good performance, and a score of 9 and 10 indicates exceptional performance. .
The score is calculated based on my measurements and when there are no measurements, it is a subjective opinion based on my experience.

The scores are not static, they change over time because the performance of new products changes and this must be taken into account.

Redmi Note 11
Finish quality7.56.00
Battery performance7.008.00
CPU performance6.56.5
GPU performance6.56.5
Screen quality8.007.00
Photo quality6.55.00
Video quality6.005.00
Wi-Fi performance87.00
Mobile download speed7.005.00
Mobile network sensitivity8.006.00
Frequency coverage8.007.00
Audio quality7.006.00
GPS performance7.006.00
Operating system8.008.00
Overall score10189
Global ranking
1. Black Shark 4 Pro 114 / 140
2. Realme Gt 112.5 / 140
3. Poco F2 Pro 111.5 / 140
4. Oneplus Nord 2t 111.5 / 140
5. Poco F5 111 / 140
6. Samsung Galaxy S20 111 / 140
7. Poco F4 Gt 110.5 / 140
8. Google Pixel 5 109.6 / 140
9. Poco F3 108.5 / 140
10. Poco X4 Gt 108 / 140
11. Google Pixel 6a 108 / 140
12. Poco X3 Pro 107.5 / 140
13. Samsung Galaxy S10+ 107 / 140
14. Xiaomi 11t 107 / 140
15. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 106.5 / 140
16. Redmi Note 12 Pro 106 / 140
17. Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro 106 / 140
18. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 105.5 / 140
19. Samsung Galaxy A52 104 / 140
20. Tcl 10 Pro 104 / 140
21. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 104 / 140
22. Redmi Note 11 Pro 103 / 140
23. Poco X4 Pro 102.5 / 140
24. Poco M4 Pro 4g 102 / 140
25. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 102 / 140
26. Poco M4 Pro 101.5 / 140
27. Unihertz Luna 101.5 / 140
28. Redmi Note 11 101 / 140
29. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g 101 / 140
30. Poco X3 101 / 140
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 101 / 140
32. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 101 / 140
33. Redmi Note 9t 100.5 / 140
34. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 100 / 140
35. Unihertz Tank 99 / 140
36. Poco X5 5g 98.5 / 140
37. Poco M5 98.5 / 140
38. Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 98 / 140
39. Doogee S96 Pro 98 / 140
40. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s 98 / 140
41. Poco F4 98 / 130
42. Poco M3 Pro 98 / 140
43. Redmi 10 97.5 / 140
44. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 97 / 140
45. Redmi Note 12 95.5 / 140
46. Umidigi Bison Pro 95 / 140
47. F150 R2022 95 / 140
48. Poco M3 94.5 / 140
49. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 94 / 140
50. Realme 6 93 / 140
51. Umidigi A9 Pro 92 / 140
52. Umidigi Bison 92 / 140
53. Tcl 30 Se 92 / 140
54. Oukitel C21 89.5 / 140
55. Motorola G8 Power 89 / 140
56. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 89 / 140
57. Nokia 5.3 89 / 140
58. Xiaomi Mi A3 89 / 140
59. Oneplus Nord N100 88.5 / 140
60. Honor 9x 88 / 140
61. Redmi 10a 88 / 140
62. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 86 / 140
63. Meizu Note 9 86 / 140
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 85 / 140
65. Umidigi S3 Pro 83 / 140
66. Umidigi F2 82 / 140
67. Samsung Galaxy A21s 82 / 140
68. Redmi 9a 81 / 140
69. Oukitel Wp18 81 / 140
70. Redmi 9c 80 / 140
71. Ulefone Armor 7e 80 / 140
72. Doogee S58 Pro 78.5 / 140
73. Honor 8x 78 / 140
74. Umidigi F1 77 / 140
75. Huawei Y6 2019 74 / 140
76. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro 57 / 70
77. Samsung Galaxy S23 8 / 10
78. Elephone U5 0 / 0

Test / Review conclusion

[b]Redmi has so far always managed to dominate the competition in the entry level by marketing complete phones at an affordable price and therefore before writing the conclusion for this new model, I asked myself the question of what the competition could offer for an equivalent price... At Samsung, nothing. At Apple, nothing. At Huawei, nothing. At Oppo, nothing. I could go on like this with most major brands. Obviously all these brands market phones capable of competing with the Redmi Note 11, they even produce many models that do better but are more expensive each time. Redmi's biggest competitor is Redmi/Xiaomi/Poco! [b][b] I really liked the Redmi Note 10, it was for me by far the best phone around 200€. So I was wondering if this new model was going to do even better and my answer is yes for certain criteria and no for other criteria. The Redmi Note 11 stands out on the level of finish a little better than the previous model, a slightly better calibrated screen, better network sensitivity, better wifi sensitivity, slightly higher performance. The differences with the previous model are not gigantic but they are very real. [b][b] It's in the photo where I find that the Redmi Note 10 is doing better, the "old" Sony sensor that was already used 3 years ago produces sharper photos and fairer than this new model where I have too much blue accentuation and less sharpness than the previous model. This does not weaken the Redmi Note 11 too much compared to other brands but I note a regression compared to the previous model [b][b] Will this Redmi Note 11 be a success? Most likely because even if the difference with the previous model is not gigantic, it brings some discreet improvements allowing the range to evolve while keeping a lead on the competition.[b][b]


Xiaomi has decided to hit hard with this new Redmi Note 11 by launching it at a price of 159$. At this price, you won't find anything better. Quantities are limited so hurry up! [b][b] Limited offer: Redmi Note 11 from $159 [b][b] The launch of the Redmi Note 11 is accompanied by the launch of the Redmi Note 11s with also an introductory offer: Redmi Note 11s from €229
[b][b][b]Strengths[b]- excellent screen (colorimetry, contrast, brightness, 90hz,...) [b] - good sensitivity to the 4G network and wifi [b] - good listening volume for calls [b] - good price/performance ratio [b] - battery charging speed [b][b][b]Weaknesses[b]- colorimetry of photos [b] - sharpness of videos (1080p limitation) [b] - lack of depth of sound through loudspeaker [b][b][b]Alternatives to this product[b][b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]

laurent willen Laurent Willen
Instead of watching nonsense on TV or YouTube, I spend my time in the evenings testing products and sharing my passion for technology, travel and photography.

I run this site in my own name and completely independently, no one pays me to do so.

I have more than 20 years of experience in the digital world, I have managed and developed many high traffic websites in companies in Belgium such as Mobistar, Microsoft, Immoweb, BrusselsAirlines, Proximus, Orange,...


Join the discussion / Ask your questions

Your comment will be published after validation. I respond to over 1500 comments a year in my spare time, so I can't always respond very quickly. Your email address will not be publicly visible and it will not be used for commercial purposes.

Be notified by email when a response is published