Thanks for your visite. If you like my work, you can support me with the following possibilities:
Subscribe to my YouTube channel I post full test videos every month. By subscribing you will be notified of each new video, but the number of YouTube subscribers is important to obtain products to test.
Subscribe to my page on Facebook I regularly post updates on Facebook, I also organize contests to win prizes. Here too, the number of fans is important to obtain material.
Use my links I don't display ads on my site because I don't like it. My only source is from purchases you make from my links. I earn a meager commission on every purchase (about 2% on average), it costs you nothing and keeps me going. Here are some links to buy your products:
I started buying T range phones from Xiaomi by starting with the Xiaomi Mi 9T which can still stand up to the competition two years after its release because this phone was so well designed. The T range went up a notch with the Mi 10T Pro, this phone was all about photo quality but it lacked an amoled screen. With the new generation 11T and 11T Pro Xiaomi sets the bar even higher and this time this new range is equipped with an amoled screen and a 108 million pixel camera. [b][b] The price of the T range has also increased because I bought the Mi 9T Pro for 300 € while now the 11T Pro costs more than 500 €. So I will see if this price increase is justified and if the T range can still stand up to Samsung. [b][b][b][b][b]linkManufacturer web site:https://www.mi.com[b]linkSite where I have bought the Xiaomi 11T: https://tidd.ly/3l6sNmQ[b]
Structure of my tests
I test the phones according to a pre-established structure (see below) to provide you with as much information as possible. Unfortunately, this takes a long time. Some tests like network performance tests take several days and for photo tests I sometimes have to wait until the weather is suitable to take pictures in good conditions. I am therefore obliged to publish the tests step by step, so I invite you to come back if the test is not complete at the time of your visit.[b] How are my tests different from others on the web?
- I usually buy the devices with my own money, so price is just as important as you are! - I keep the devices for at least a few weeks (sometimes more) to see what they are worth in real conditions. - I answer (when possible) your questions to help you decide before you buy - no one pays me to do these reviews, so I'm completely neutral and independent... - My pages are not filled with ads
The list below shows the prices for the Xiaomi 11T from more than 50 sites around the world. If you are not satisfied with any price, you can subscribe to a price alert to be the first to be notified when the price drops.[b]bb
helpThe above links are affiliate links from companies such as Amazon, Gearbest, Aliexpress,... If you appreciate my work, I would be grateful if you could purchase these products through these links. It costs you absolutely nothing but I get a small commission that allows me to buy the material I test. Thank you very much!
Timeline
November 19, 2021: I bought the Xiaomi 11T On RueDuCommerce.fr during Black Friday week [b] November 24, 2021: I received the phone, the test can begin[b]
Why this phone?
I had no intention of testing the 11T when it came out because it was overpriced and seeing the upward trend in prices, I figured I was never going to test it. For the first time, therefore, I would have skipped the Xiaomi T range. Two things made me change my mind, the first is a price drop on the occasion of Black Friday week on RueDuCommerce.fr and the second is that I had a voucher at RueDuCommerce which was soon to expire. [b][b] I've always enjoyed the T range and if the price hadn't gone up so much I would have bought this new model without hesitation. The T range stands for performance, good photo quality, good workmanship and a whole host of other good things. This new version corrects the error of the previous generation by offering, using an amoled screen and the photo side, the 11T uses the Samsung sensor at 108 million pixels which is also used on the 11T Pro and the Redmi Note 10 Pro. The new generation runs on a Mediatek architecture, this will probably result in a little less performance but other advantages like better GPS accuracy.[b]
Unpacking
Over time and the phones of the T range that I have tested, the boxes have evolved and now apart for the Poco brand, Xiaomi standardizes its boxes to the maximum. We therefore find the usual codes for the format and colors but on the other hand the content is slightly different. We find the phone and as usual the manual, the transparent protection, the charger and the USB cable but this time Xiaomi has placed headphones in the box as well as a USB adapter for the headphones. The charger delivered in the box is a 67W charger, so you won't need to purchase an additional charger to take full advantage of the 11T's charging speed. [b][b]
3add_a_photo
[b]
Length : 164.1 Width : 76.9 Thickness : 8.8 Weight : 203 Jack output : No USB Type : Type C Infrared port : Yes
First configuration
Setting up the Xiaomi 11T follows the same process as all other Xiaomi phones launched under MIUI 12.5, I didn't notice any difference with other recently tested phones. The screens are the same with still this attempt to sign up for the Xiaomi cloud and there is now also a screen for Google Pay.[b]
Finish
The Xiaomi 11T broadly follows the visual identity of the previous generation with its back with mirrored metallic reflections. The back surface is perfectly smooth, it is just interrupted by an imposing photo block which protrudes a few millimeters, so the phone cannot be placed flat on its back. The 108 million pixel sensor takes up space, so you have to put it somewhere. The back is cool and smooth, quite pleasant to the touch but you will be spending your time cleaning the fingerprints.
Xiaomi has chosen its largest panel at the moment for this 11T, I'm almost sure that I already had to test this screen on another phone from the brand, the screen test will allow us to see if I am right. The screen is a 6.67 inch amoled screen with a resolution of 1080x2400 pixels which occupies 85% of the available space. It is not yet a full screen experience but we are approaching it, the borders would undoubtedly be thinner for a phone of this price there. The selfie sensor is placed in the center, it doesn't take up much space but again, for this price point, I expected a more discreet sensor.
Above there is an infrared emitter and one of the two external speakers.
Below we find the other external speaker, the USB port and the SIM drawer which can accommodate two sim cards in duplex mode.
On the sides, nothing new, we find the ignition button on the right, it is also equipped with a fingerprint sensor which works quite well. The volume buttons are also on the right in the usual place. The left edge is perfectly smooth since the sim drawer is located below the phone. [b][b] The Xiaomi 11T has a good level of finish, we can hardly fault it for anything. I do not see any major change with the previous generation, the price has on the other hand increased a lot, so it is not on the side of the finishes that we will have to look for an explanation for the increase in price.[b]
Specifications
[b]The information below comes from the Device Info HW application. The application provides detailed technical information about the tested phone. I tested the 8GB / 128 Gb version of the Xiaomi 11T, which is also the version that sets the bar very high in terms of RAM. This phone runs under a Mediatek architecture for the CPU, GPU, wifi and GPS. I find the usual accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope, I also see a barometer in the technical characteristics. [b][b] The screen uses a default frequency of 60hz but can be configured to 120Hz, it also supports wide gamut, DolbyVision, HDR10 and HLG. The main camera is a Samsung S5khm2 which can also be found in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, the wide-angle sensor is the usual Sony IMX 355, it is present in almost all Xiaomi phones sold in 2021. [b][b]
[b][b]The Xiaomi 11T is equipped with a Mediatek Dimensity 1200 processor, I have not yet tested this processor but it should deliver good performance as it is more in the top of the Mediatek range. For the graphics part this phone is based on an ARM Mali G77 which is also a high-end GPU that I have already tested on the Samsung Galaxy S20. This smartphone is therefore well equipped to deliver above average performance and even if it is not the most powerful on the market, it should offer a high level of performance.[b]
Benchmark Antutu/3DMark
I got a score of 527,127 points on Antutu, this ranks this phone at the top of the table but for a similar or lower price point other phones like the Poco F3 or Realme GT do better. This does not detract from the performance of the 11T obviously but if you are looking for the best price / performance compromise, this phone is a bit too expensive. For the graphics part, I get a score which is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S20 and it is normal since it is the same material but I expected a better optimization. [b][b] The Xiaomi 11T therefore offers very good performance which should allow you to use any game or application without making any concessions.[b]
Antutu score : 530135 Antutu CPU : 147135 Antutu GPU : 206225 Antutu UX : 84553 Antutu Mem : 91815
[b]Top 10 - performance ranking based on Antutu 1. Poco F4 Gt - 853016 2. Realme Gt - 811858 3. Black Shark 4 Pro - 759986 4. Poco X4 Gt - 714577 5. Oppo Find X2 Pro - 605184 6. Oneplus 8t - 595000 7. Poco F3 - 589677 8. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro - 581650 9. Oneplus 8 Pro - 579417 10. Xiaomi Mi 10 - 579114
Number of smartphones in the ranking:151 Position of this smartphone in the ranking:15/151
Note: this ranking only contains the phones I tested as well as a few others that I added for reference. [b]Gaming[b]To test the performance in game, I download the mobile PUBG game and evaluate the in-game experience, graphics level and depth of vision. This game is quite demanding and should help you evaluating the performance of a phone. The Xiaomi 11T sits at the top end of gaming performance, so you can play any game without compromising on graphics. The amoled screen with its 120hz display frequency as well as its 240hz sample rate will also improve your gaming experience.[b][b][b]
Network performance
This phone is compatible with 13 5G frequencies and 23 4G frequencies, so it is compatible with all frequencies used in Europe and you could use it in many countries outside Europe.[b]
Choose your country to check if your phone is compatible:
The frequencies displayed below will allow you to see if this phone is compatible with your operator or if you will be able to use it in the country where you are going on vacation.
Signal 4G (from December 2020)[b]I decided to change the methodology for measuring the network because I noticed that the configuration of the mobile network changes over time. This makes it more difficult to compare phones because the conditions are no longer exactly the same.[b][b]To overcome this problem, I set up a device that captures 24 hours a day about ten parameters from the mobile network (ex: cell id, rssi, rsrq, snr, frequency,...). I then place the phone next to the device for 24 to 48 hours taking the same measurements so that I can compare them. [b][b] Overview of the phones tested with this methodology[b][b]
Phone tested:
Measurements
Avg signal (reference)
Avg signal (phone)
Min/Max (reference)
Min/Max (phone)
Samsung Galaxy S10+
457
-93.06
-97.39
-89 / -98
-97 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro
669
-93.69
-95.84
-90 / -95
-92 / -98
Poco F2 Pro
1438
-91.02
-94.99
-89 / -94
-94 / -96
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g
1645
-90.77
-95.02
- 88 / -98
-95 / -100
Poco X3
821
-94.89
-103.19
-91 / -97.7
-101 / -104
Umidigi Bison
2343
-92.71
-96.46
-90 / -99
-94 / -102
Oukitel C21
1101
-92.04
-94.99
-90 / -97
-92 / -95
Poco M3
1116
-92.09
-91.74
-88 / -98
-90 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro
1071
-90.61
-94.03
-88 / -94
-94 / -96
Umidigi A9 Pro
981
-90.40
-94.01
-88 / -95
-93 / -95
Redmi Note 9t
1201
-92.149
-91.71
-90 / -97
-91 / -97
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
999
-92.35
-93.99
-88 / -97
-92 / -98
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
877
-89.72
-90.56
- 88 / -92
-89 / -95
Poco X3 Pro
1876
-91.45
-92.91
-90 / -94
-90 / -96
Poco F3
1382
-90.79
-94.2
-89 / -94
-93 / -98
Oneplus Nord N100
896
-91.23
-96.005
-88 / - 99
-96 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
2875
-91.36
-91.49
-87 / -96
-90 / -96
Samsung Galaxy A52
1427
-89.27
-93.39
-87 / -98
-92 / -96
Doogee S96 Pro
1259
-94.2
-91.21
-90 / -102
-88 / -95
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s
957
-92.07
-97.62
-90 / -102
-96 / -102
Poco M3 Pro
1247
-91.76
-102.97
-99 / -104
-88 / -98
Realme Gt
843
-96.49
-94.02
-93 / -101
- 92 / -96
F150 R2022
1002
-92.4
-105.1
-90 / -97
-98 / -110
Umidigi Bison Pro
936
-94.2
-104.98
-91 / -98
-95 / -105
Redmi 10
2141
-94.74
-100.92
-92 / -98
-99 / -101
Tcl 10 Pro
871
-93.43
-94.001
-92 / -96
-93 / -95
Poco M4 Pro
570
-93.71
-96.78
-91 / -98
-95 / -99
Google Pixel 5
1444
-91.02
-97.02
-90 / -94
-97 / -101
Xiaomi 11t
1576
-92.305
-92.003
-90 / -96
-92 / -93
Redmi Note 11
1223
-92.5
-91.32
-92/-97
-90 / -93
Black Shark 4 Pro
2383
-95.178
-95.42
-90 / -100
-93 / -101
Redmi Note 11 Pro
349
-95.33
-93
-89 / -101
-92 / -94
Poco M4 Pro 4g
1202
-90.85
-88.95
-87 / - 95
-88 / -98
Tcl 30 Se
567
-92.11
-92.85
-88 / -98
-99 / -93
Poco X4 Pro
562
-92.06
-94.01
-90 / -95
-95 / -93
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g
945
-93.5
-93.54
-91 / -97
-92 / -97
Poco F4 Gt
832
-95.02
-93.09
-90 / -99
-93 / -97
Oukitel Wp18
1351
-95.94
-92.92
-91 / -97
-92 / -97
Poco X4 Gt
387
-96.99
-96.505
-96 / -98
-95 / -98
Poco F4
524
-95.78
-95.04
-93 / -99
-94/-96
Oneplus Nord 2t
1340
-98.83
-96.305
-95 / -102
-90 / -99
Redmi 10a
707
-89.026
-97.97
-87 / -91
-97 / -103
Poco M5
762
-95.18
-95.07
-98 / -93
-99 / -94
Unihertz Tank
1426
-91.21
-93.97
-90 / -95
-89 / -96
Poco X5 5g
2234
-92.3
-99.1
-91 / -95
- 100 / -98
Google Pixel 6a
853
-91.8
-95
-90 / -94
-95 / -97
[b][b]I made 1576 measurements to assess the signal quality of the Xiaomi 11T and I got an average signal of -92.003 dBm while at the moment I got an average signal of -92.305 dBm with the probe. This phone therefore obtains a better signal than the probe, this only happens very rarely, so this score is one of the best scores I have obtained. In addition to having good network sensitivity, this phone managed to keep a very stable signal on all the measurements, I only measured a deviation of 1 dBm. On the next graph the orange tips show the rare times when the probe has done better than the phone and the stability of the phone forms an almost perfect blue circle.
[b][b][b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the download speed, I have identified some 4G cells offering good performance where I test all my devices several times to see what download and upload speed they can achieve.[b]Top 10 - speed ranking in download 1. Samsung Galaxy S20 D:351Mbps U: 20Mbps 2. Poco X3 D:232Mbps U: 55Mbps 3. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g D:223Mbps U: 52Mbps 4. Poco F2 Pro D:207Mbps U: 53Mbps 5. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite D:153Mbps U: 68Mbps 6. Xiaomi Mi A3 D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps 7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps 8. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite D:149Mbps U: 60Mbps 9. Samsung Galaxy A21s D:147Mbps U: 51Mbps 10. Huawei Y6 2019 D:145Mbps U: 61Mbps
Number of smartphones in the ranking:30 Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/30
Note: the theoretical maximum speed of a telephone is often limited by the configuration of the mobile network and the congestion of the network at the time of the measurement. So maybe you could get a higher speed on another network [b][b]
Wifi performance
To test a phone's ability to receive the network properly, I take measurements near my router and then remotely (and always at the same place). This gives me an average in dBm where a value of -90 dBm indicates poorer performance than a value at -30 dBm.[b]
Wifi signal[b]I performed 343 wifi signal measurements to measure signal stability and strength. I obtained a very stable signal with a variable of maximum 3 dBm over the entire duration of the measurement, the average signal was established at 24 dBm near my router. This score is a fairly average score, the Consys_MT6893 wifi chipset does not rank among the most sensitive. Remote measurements result in a signal of -68 dBm, which is also an average score. When I indicate that a score is average it does not mean that this score is bad.[b][b]Top 10 - wifi sensitivity ranking 1. Poco F2 Pro -11dBm 2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro -12dBm 3. Realme Gt -12dBm 4. Samsung Galaxy A21s -13dBm 5. Redmi Note 11 Pro -13dBm 6. Oneplus Nord N100 -15dBm 7. Poco X3 Pro -15dBm 8. Poco F3 -15dBm 9. Redmi Note 9t -15dBm 10. Black Shark 4 Pro -15dBm
Number of smartphones in the ranking:70 Position of this smartphone in the ranking:43/70
[b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the speed in Wifi, I connect to my router in 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz (if available) and use the Ookla application to measure the speed.[b]Top 10 - wifi download speed ranking 1. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 866Mbps 2. Poco F4 866Mbps 3. Poco F4 Gt 866Mbps 4. Poco X4 Gt 866Mbps 5. Oneplus Nord 2t 866Mbps 6. Black Shark 4 Pro 866Mbps 7. Google Pixel 6a 833Mbps 8. Poco M4 Pro 4g 433Mbps 9. Poco X5 5g 433Mbps 10. Poco M5 433Mbps
Number of smartphones in the ranking:68 Position of this smartphone in the ranking:19/68
Note: I have a 400Mbps line and a modem capable of delivering higher speed, but I can never be sure how much bandwidth is available when doing a test. [b]
GPS performance
[b]To test the accuracy of the GPS signal, I use two positioning applications to evaluate the difference between the actual position and the position indicated by the phone. This test is done outdoors with nothing to obstruct the signal. An accuracy level of up to 3 meters can easily be corrected by an application (e.g. Google Maps).[b][b] This phone is equipped with a Mediatek GPS chip which gives it a good level of GPS precision, I have here obtained a level of precision of the order of 2 meters, it is slightly better than the accuracy of Qualcomm GPS chips. This phone is also capable of receiving several frequencies: L1 / L5, E1 / E5a and B1.[b][b]Top 10 - GPS accuracy ranking 1. Poco M5 1m 2. Poco X4 Gt 1m 3. Unihertz Tank 1m 4. Oukitel C21 1m 5. Redmi 9a 1m 6. Redmi 10a 1m 7. Doogee S96 Pro 1m 8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 1m 9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1m 10. Umidigi Bison Pro 1m
Number of smartphones in the ranking:41 Position of this smartphone in the ranking:19/41
Note: An accuracy of 3 meters or less can easily be corrected by a good GPS application. Phone performance also plays a role in how fast your display updates, so good accuracy could be compromised by too slow a display. [b]
Battery range
To test battery life I developed an application that measures the battery level minute by minute until the battery is empty. This application consumes about ten percent of the phone's resources and I do a test with 100 brightness. This test aims to reproduce a contemplative use of a phone (e.g. surfing the internet, reading articles, spending time on social networks). These results are not valid for intensive gaming/streaming use.
Capacity : 5000 Fast charge : Yes W max : 67 Range (100% brightness) : 476.00 Range (50% brightness) : 1204.00 Charging time : 97.00 Discharge speed (100%) : 0.21 Discharge score (100%) : 10.50 Discharge speed (50%) : 0.08 Discharge score (50%) : 4.15 Charging speed : 1.03 Charging score : 51.55
From March 2020, I replaced my subjective battery test with a technical test to better measure the real behaviour of the battery. Now I test the autonomy and charging time under absolutely identical conditions. I perform several measurements, so this test alone takes several days during which I cannot use the phone for anything else.
Battery life - methodology To test the battery life, I measure the battery consumption every minute in strictly identical conditions to be able to compare phones and also to allow you to evaluate your phone in the same conditions. I rule out any influence of applications that could interfere with the measurement. The autonomy is not linear, the battery sometimes discharges much faster at the end. This is a frustrating phenomenon but with my measurements, you will know if you need to find a charger quickly.
Battery life The battery of the Xiaomi 11T has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has discharged from 100% to 1% in 476.00 minutes with 100% brightness, it has discharged from 100% to 1% in 1204.00 minutes with 50% brightness. I obtain in this way an average discharge speed of 0.21% per minute with 100% luminosity and 0.08% per minute with 50% luminosity, the consumption is therefore 10.50 mA per minute with 100% luminosity and 4.15 with 50% luminosity. To be able to compare the efficiency of the phone and its influence on the battery, you have to compare the 10.50 (or 50%) score with that of other smartphones, the figure should be as low as possible.
Charging time - methodology To test the charging time, I always use the same charger with the same cable. I measure the charging time minute by minute to see the evolution of the charge as well as the charging speed. The charging speed of a battery is not linear, it is often faster at the beginning and slower at the end. The charger is compatible with fast charging.
Charging time The battery of the Xiaomi 11T has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has been charged from 1% to 100% in 97.00 minutes. This gives me an average charging speed of 1.03% per minute and therefore an increase of 51.55 mA per minute. To compare the performance of the Xiaomi 11T compared to other phones, you should use the 51.55 per minute score, this score should be as high as possible.
Important note: the charging speed is not always linear, the graph below gives you an indication of the battery behaviour.
The following table lists the phones tested with the technical battery test, they are ranked in order of efficiency. A higher battery capacity should logically result in a higher battery life but it is not always the case and it does not give any indication of the efficiency of a phone.
Smartphone
Capacity (mAh)
Battery life (minutes)
Efficiency Score
Battery life (minutes) / 50%
Efficiency Score / 50%
Charging time
.Score charging
Oukitel C21
4000
497.00
8.05
1324.00
3.02
167.00
23.95
Nokia 5.3
4000
549.00
7.29
1096.00
3.65
199.00
20.10
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000
565.00
7.08
1217.00
3.29
136.00
29.41
Honor 9x
4000
770.00
5.19
1333.00
3.00
151.00
26.49
Google Pixel 5
4080
773.00
5.28
1559.00
2.62
81.00
50.37
Umidigi A9 Pro
4150
552.00
7.52
1562.00
2.66
112.00
37.05
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g
4160
749.00
5.55
1541.00
2.70
163.00
25.52
Realme 6
4300
704.00
6.11
1104.00
3.89
162.00
26.54
Google Pixel 6a
4410
534
8.26
1935
2.28
111
39.73
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500
652.00
6.90
1239.00
3.63
165.00
27.27
Realme Gt
4500
574.00
7.84
1057.00
4.26
87.00
51.72
Tcl 10 Pro
4500
465.00
9.68
889.00
5.06
133.00
33.83
Black Shark 4 Pro
4500
425.00
10.59
937.00
4.80
29.00
155.17
Poco F4
4500
554.00
8.12
1141
3.94
98
45.92
Oneplus Nord 2t
4500
693
6.49
1492
3.02
121
37.19
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g
4500
525.00
8.57
1211
3.72
24
187.50
Poco F3
4520
657.00
6.88
1840.00
2.46
122.00
37.05
Poco F4 Gt
4700
365.00
12.88
1082
4.34
38
123.68
Poco F2 Pro
4700
1150.00
4.09
1536.00
3.06
180.00
26.11
Poco M3 Pro
5000
657.00
7.61
1647.00
3.04
131.00
38.17
Poco X4 Pro
5000
643.00
7.78
1361
3.67
74
67.57
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s
5000
636.00
7.86
1556.00
3.21
161.00
31.06
Redmi 10
5000
664.00
7.53
1684.00
2.97
165.00
30.30
Tcl 30 Se
5000
650
7.69
1 225.00
4.08
172
29.07
Poco M4 Pro 4g
5000
723.00
6.92
1 500.00
3.33
77.00
64.94
Umidigi Bison Pro
5000
610.00
8.20
1632.00
3.06
255.00
19.61
Poco M4 Pro
5000
634.00
7.89
1600.00
3.13
123.00
40.65
Xiaomi 11t
5000
476.00
10.50
1204.00
4.15
97.00
51.55
Oneplus Nord N100
5000
808.00
6.19
1278.00
3.91
663.00
7.54
Motorola G8 Power
5000
912.00
5.48
2792.00
1.79
311.00
16.08
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
5000
691.00
7.24
1728.00
2.89
193.00
25.91
Redmi Note 9t
5000
766.00
6.53
2054.00
2.43
148.00
33.78
Redmi 10a
5000
682
7.33
1820
2.75
163
30.67
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000
729.00
6.86
1283.00
3.90
166.00
30.12
Poco X5 5g
5000
493
10.14
1058
4.73
228
21.93
Redmi 9a
5000
694.00
7.20
1902.00
2.63
195.00
25.64
Umidigi Bison
5000
550.00
9.09
1471.00
3.40
238.00
21.01
Redmi 9c
5000
656.00
7.62
1915.00
2.61
170.00
29.41
Redmi Note 11
5000
592.00
8.45
1 376.00
3.63
69.00
72.46
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s
5020
663.00
7.57
1876.00
2.68
224.00
22.41
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020
650.00
7.72
1808.00
2.78
162.00
30.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020
625.00
8.03
1557.00
3.22
213.00
23.57
Poco X4 Gt
5080
726.00
7.00
1538
3.30
113
44.96
Umidigi F2
5150
927.00
5.56
1854.00
2.78
299.00
17.22
Poco X3
5160
653.00
7.90
1654.00
3.12
181.00
28.51
Poco X3 Pro
5160
648.00
7.96
1688.00
3.06
138.00
37.39
Doogee S58 Pro
5180
845.00
6.13
1908.00
2.71
177.00
29.27
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260
827.00
6.36
1609.00
3.27
208.00
25.29
Ulefone Armor 7e
5500
768.00
7.16
1140.00
4.82
179.00
30.73
Poco M3
6000
842.00
7.13
1898.00
3.16
217.00
27.65
Doogee S96 Pro
6350
929.00
6.84
1405.00
4.52
424.00
14.98
F150 R2022
8300
879.00
9.44
1498.00
5.54
243.00
34.16
Oukitel Wp18
12500
2 733.00
4.57
2859
4.37
362
34.53
helpHow to read these figures? The battery capacity is an important element in determining the autonomy of a phone but it is not the only factor. A phone with a large battery may have a shorter battery life if it consumes more power. If I had to take an example from everyday life, I would use the universe of the car. If a car has a large fuel tank, it should be able to drive a longer distance unless its average fuel consumption is higher. The battery efficiency score works the same way, it should be as low as possible and represents the energy consumption of the phone. These differences in efficiency are often related to the brightness of the screen, large bright screens will tend to consume more energy and even if they have a large battery, their range will be shorter.
In summary One of the strengths of this phone is its battery charging speed. With 67W fast charging, it's probably one of the fastest phones I've tested. It took me 96 minutes to charge the battery from 1% to 100% and the charging rate is really fast as it takes 16 minutes to get to 20%. The rate decreases to 90% but not significantly because the last 10 percent is reached in 10-15 minutes.
[b][b] I got an autonomy of 476 minutes with the brightness at 100%, it is not enough for a battery of this type but it will probably be explained later screen test. The screen seems very bright to me and therefore very energy intensive, the size of the screen will not promote good battery life with 100% brightness. For normal use (eg: reading posts, pages, ...), this screen will be the element consuming the most resources, so you have to lower the brightness a little to significantly increase the autonomy. With the brightness at 50%, I got a battery life of 1204 minutes, that's almost 3 times more than with the brightness at 100%. The performance of the battery is quite linear, I did not see any change in the rhythm in the consumption of the battery.
In summary, the charging speed is excellent, the autonomy at 100% of brightness is not very good but at 50% it is classified in the good average. [b][b]
Photo camera test
To test the quality of photos produced by a phone, I do a technical test (resolution, sharpness, chromatic aberration,...) in studio (identical conditions) to evaluate the technical part objectively. From the second half of 2020, I built my own laboratory to take completely objective technical measurements. I then take pictures in real conditions to see how the camera performs. I then evaluate these photos according to my criteria but I publish the photos so that you can evaluate the result according to your criteria.[b]
The Xiaomi 11T is equipped with a Samsung S5KHM2 of 108 million pixels as the main sensor, I have already tested this sensor on the Redmi Note 10 Pro and I was a little disappointed with the colorimetry. Hope Xiaomi fixed the problem on this model. This sensor is also present in the Poco X4, the Redmi Note 11 Pro or even the Motorola Edge 20. [b][b] It is also equipped with an 8 million Sony IMX 355 ultra wide angle sensor. pixels that I tested more than ten times in 2021. There is also a Samsung macro sensor but this kind of sensor is not very interesting on a phone. For selfies, Xiaomi opted for an Omnivision OV16A10 sensor. [b][b] The main sensor of this phone is therefore also available on phones at a much lower price point, so this is not where we have to look for a reason that would explain the difference in price. [b][b][b]
Photo quality
Photo quality (indoor/studio)[b]The studio test is carried out under the same conditions so that the results can be compared on an equal basis. I calibrate my lighting for each test to obtain the same brightness and colour temperature. This test is a preliminary analysis of the technical qualities of a camera. Most phones fail this test, so you should also read the results of the other tests in the following paragraphs.[b][b] Main sensor: Samsung S5KHM2
For this first test I took as usual a series of photos with the main sensor using all the available modes (108 MP, HDR, AI, ...). The photo above is the one taken in 108 MP mode. Photos taken in the studio are often too dark, this time it isn't. Although the photo could have been exposed a little better, the result is correct. The colorimetry is too warm and it may not be visible at first glance but if you compare this photo to the other photos in the gallery, you will find that the other photos are cooler. The colorimetry test will allow you to see which type of setting offers the best result, but I had already noticed this difference on the Redmi Note 10 Pro, so no change. The sharpness in the center is good and we feel that the phone puts all the weight of the sharpness on the objects in the center, it is quite common. [b][b]
This photo gives a better idea of the sharpness produced by this sensor. The sharpness in the center is good, the Canadian note is well detailed, the small characters are perfectly legible. This sharpness does not seem to deteriorate enormously on the periphery, the small characters of the banknotes on the periphery are still easily readable, I note a small loss on the Hungarian banknote. [b][b] Secondary sensor: Sony IMX 355
At the risk of repeating myself for those who have read other tests on my site, this Ultra-wide-angle sensor does quite well for a sensor of this type, but it is not able to compete with the main sensor. The deformations are present, the sharpness is not excellent but on the other hand the colors are correct. [b][b]
The effect on sharpness is clearly more visible here, the Canadian banknote is less sharp than with the Samsung sensor and this deteriorates at the periphery. I've seen the same with every other phone using this sensor, so the 11T doesn't make any improvement here. [b][b]
8add_a_photo
[b][b]Photo: technical test[b]I was inspired by industrial technical tests to create my own technical test to evaluate the technical quality of a camera. This test is an objective assessment of a camera's ability to render a scene correctly. [b][b]I test the following elements:[b]- centre sharpness, peripheral sharpness[b]- colour fidelity based on 24 reference colours[b]- level of chromatic aberration[b]- dynamic range (ability to capture dark and light areas without loss)[b]- distortion[b][b]The technical evaluation may differ from the subjective evaluation as the feeling of a photo will be influenced by the processing provided by each manufacturer.[b][b] Main sensor: Samsung S5KHM2
For this first test I took as usual a series of photos with the main sensor using all the available modes (108 MP, HDR, AI, ...). The photo above is the one taken in 108 MP mode. Photos taken in the studio are often too dark, this time it isn't. Although the photo could have been exposed a little better, the result is correct. The colorimetry is too warm and it may not be visible at first glance but if you compare this photo to the other photos in the gallery, you will find that the other photos are cooler. The colorimetry test will allow you to see which type of setting offers the best result, but I had already noticed this difference on the Redmi Note 10 Pro, so no change. The sharpness in the center is good and we feel that the phone puts all the weight of the sharpness on the objects in the center, it is quite common. [b][b]
This photo gives a better idea of the sharpness produced by this sensor. The sharpness in the center is good, the Canadian note is well detailed, the small characters are perfectly legible. This sharpness does not seem to deteriorate enormously on the periphery, the small characters of the banknotes on the periphery are still easily readable, I note a small loss on the Hungarian banknote. [b][b] Secondary sensor: Sony IMX 355
At the risk of repeating myself for those who have read other tests on my site, this Ultra-wide-angle sensor does quite well for a sensor of this type, but it is not able to compete with the main sensor. The deformations are present, the sharpness is not excellent but on the other hand the colors are correct. [b][b]
The effect on sharpness is clearly more visible here, the Canadian banknote is less sharp than with the Samsung sensor and this deteriorates at the periphery. I've seen the same with every other phone using this sensor, so the 11T doesn't make any improvement here. [b][b]
8add_a_photo
[b][b]Outdoor photo quality[b] Samsung S5KHM2 main sensor
When I test phones in winter, I always have the same problem testing the photo part. The days are much shorter, the light is not very good and we still have to find a day without rain. I didn't have much of a choice to go out in ideal conditions, it was cloudy and the sun wasn't very present. [b][b] Here are my observations for these outdoor photos: [b] - the exposure time could have been a bit longer, the photos are a bit too dark [b] - the colorimetry is too hot [b] - the sharpness in the center is good, it degrades at the periphery [b] - the dynamic page looks good, I have no areas of over / under exposure [b][b] Beyond the exposure time which could have been better, what bothered me the most was the too hot colorimetry which gives the trees a brown tint. The conditions were not ideal but for a high end phone I think Xiaomi could have made a better choice. [b][b] If I use pro mode to output RAW file, I can get better result under identical conditions:
27add_a_photo
Sensor secondary
I took a photo at the same location to compare the two sensors. This Sony sensor does a good job for such a sensor and it even surpasses the Samsung in colorimetry and dynamic range. It does not however manage to match the sharpness of the Samsung sensor, the photo is not as detailed as the main sensor. If you look at your photos only on your phone, this Sony sensor can arguably compete with the main sensor under certain conditions. Be careful, however, not to take subjects too close to you because the deformation is very important.
8add_a_photo
[b][b]Test photo / night[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]
Video quality
Stabilisation[b] The Xiaomi 11T is powerful enough to stabilize videos at 4K 30 fps. The stabilization is effective and absorbs the shocks of my steps quite well, the focusing is not always fast enough and the exposure jumps are visible. Stabilization will therefore be especially effective when the light conditions are good.[b]Video normale conditions The Xiaomi 11T is capable of filming in 4k and 30 frames per second. The quality of the video produced by this sensor is good, the focus is quite fast and I do not see any exposure jumps. I just have the impression that the video has lost a few frames (due to variable framerate?) Which sometimes causes a little jerk. The colorimetry is too hot, it's the same as for the photos. I also find it a shame here that Xiaomi has equipped a mid-range sensor in a high-end phone.[b]Video low light[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]
External audio quality
[b]This test is intended to give you an overview of the volume and sound quality during calls and when listening to music through the external speakers. [b][b] The Xiaomi 11T produces good quality sound with its external speakers, the highs are well mastered and the lows are well rendered even if they lack a little power. The volume produced by the external speakers is average. [b][b] For calls, the volume with the main speaker is average. The sound quality in call is good, there is clearly a work on the sound because calls of this type often result in too much treble. I feel here that the sound has been softened. Using the external loudspeaker for calls makes it possible to rise above 60 db, which is also an average value here.[b]
Audio quality (headphones)
To test the quality of the phone's audio output, I connect the device's audio output to a measuring tool, then play sounds on all frequencies and measure the differences between the original sound and the sound produced by the phone. In this way I measure the phone's ability to correctly reproduce all sounds.[b] The 11T does not have a jack output and when I have to use a usb to jack converter I am not getting good results for my measurements, so I have to fall back on good old subjective judgment. The sound quality is good overall but the sound is not as thin as in the top of the range Samsung, the difference is not huge but going from one to the other the difference is noticeable. The power of the sound with the jack adapter is not extraordinary because even with the volume at full blast, there is still room. On the other hand with bluetooth headphones, the volume is much more powerful. The sound is quite well controlled because I did not hear any distortion with the jack adapter, it was a little less the case at 100% of the volume with the bluetooth headphones. [b][b] I don't know what audio chipset is used in this 11T, most likely it is the same as in other Xiaomi phones. So far, Xiaomi has not yet managed to dethrone the top of the range Samsung in terms of sound, but they are not very far.[b]
Screen quality
To test the screen, I use a colorimetric probe that measures the color accuracy of a screen, as well as other parameters to see if a screen is able to correctly reproduce an image. I also test the brightness level to determine if the screen will be able to display an image in full sunlight.[b]
Screen size : 6.67 Resolution : 1080 x 2400 Ratio : 20:9 Type : Amoled % occupancy : 85 dE white : 6.4 dE red : 0.6 dE green : 0.3 dE blue : 1.3 dE jaune : 0.9 dE cyan : 1.8 dE magenta : 0.6 White temperature : 6574 Contrast : 1000000:1 Brightness : 596
Colorimetry[b]
This phone is equipped with a 6.67 inch Amoled screen with a frequency of 120hz. I got an excellent dE of 1.97 with good color balance and with white measured at 6574K. The contrast is also very good (almost infinite contrast), the blacks will therefore be very black. The screen isn't the best screen I've tested but it's definitely in the top 10. [b][b][b][b]Top 10 - ranking of the best screens by colorimetry 1. Poco X4 Gt dE = 0.6 2. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g dE = 0.73 3. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro dE = 0.83 4. Redmi Note 11 dE = 0.91 5. Google Pixel 6a dE = 1.01 6. Google Pixel 5 dE = 1.11 7. Realme Gt dE = 1.17 8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite dE = 1.19 9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 dE = 1.2 10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 dE = 1.23
Number of smartphones in the ranking:71 Position of this smartphone in the ranking:23/71
Note: the colorimetric difference is measured in dE. After three, the human eye will perceive a colorimetric difference, so the dE should be the lowest. The tests were all carried out with a colorimetric probe. [b]Brightness / Contrast[b]I measured a brightness of 596 cd / m² by flooding the sensor with light, it is possible that the screen is able to deliver even more brightness. With such a level of brightness, you will be able to use this phone in direct sunlight without any problem (as long as you activate the "sun" mode).[b]
Biometry
The fingerprint sensor is on the power button of the phone, this sensor works great and is very fast.[b]
Operating system
[b]The 11T runs MIUI 12.5 as soon as it is released, so it offers the same functionality as all other phones running the same version of MIUI, I haven't encountered any particular problems with this phone.[b]
Encoutered bugs
Not yet available / tested[b][b]
Accessories Xiaomi 11T
To better enjoy your experience with your smartphone, I offer links to all kinds of accessories that you might find useful
I assigned a score of 1 to 10 for each test that determines the strengths and weaknesses of a product. I am using 0 for criteria that have not (yet) been tested. A score of 1 to 3 indicates poor performance (and yes, it does), a score of 4 to 6 indicates average performance, a score of 7 to 8 indicates good performance, and a score of 9 and 10 indicates exceptional performance. . The score is calculated based on my measurements and when there are no measurements, it is a subjective opinion based on my experience.
The scores are not static, they change over time because the performance of new products changes and this must be taken into account.
Xiaomi 11T
Finish quality
8.00
6.00
Battery performance
7.50
8.00
CPU performance
8
6.5
GPU performance
8.00
6.5
Screen quality
8.00
7.00
Photo quality
7.50
5.00
Video quality
7.5
5.00
Wi-Fi performance
6.50
7.00
Mobile download speed
7.00
5.00
Mobile network sensitivity
8.00
6.00
Frequency coverage
8.00
7.00
Audio quality
7.50
6.00
GPS performance
7.50
6.00
Operating system
8.00
8.00
Overall score
107
89
Global ranking 1. Black Shark 4 Pro 114 / 140 2. Realme Gt 112.5 / 140 3. Oneplus Nord 2t 111.5 / 140 4. Poco F2 Pro 111.5 / 140 5. Samsung Galaxy S20 111 / 140 6. Poco F4 Gt 110.5 / 140 7. Google Pixel 5 109.6 / 140 8. Poco F3 108.5 / 140 9. Google Pixel 6a 108 / 140 10. Poco X4 Gt 108 / 140 11. Poco X3 Pro 107.5 / 140 12. Samsung Galaxy S10+ 107 / 140 13. Xiaomi 11t 107 / 140 14. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 106.5 / 140 15. Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro 106 / 140 16. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 105.5 / 140 17. Tcl 10 Pro 104 / 140 18. Samsung Galaxy A52 104 / 140 19. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 104 / 140 20. Redmi Note 11 Pro 103 / 140 21. Poco X4 Pro 102.5 / 140 22. Poco M4 Pro 4g 102 / 140 23. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 102 / 140 24. Poco M4 Pro 101.5 / 140 25. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g 101 / 140 26. Poco X3 101 / 140 27. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 101 / 140 28. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 101 / 140 29. Redmi Note 11 101 / 140 30. Redmi Note 9t 100.5 / 140 31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 100 / 140 32. Poco X5 5g 98.5 / 140 33. Doogee S96 Pro 98 / 140 34. Poco F4 98 / 130 35. Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 98 / 140 36. Poco M3 Pro 98 / 140 37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s 98 / 140 38. Redmi 10 97.5 / 140 39. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 97 / 140 40. F150 R2022 95 / 140 41. Umidigi Bison Pro 95 / 140 42. Poco M3 94.5 / 140 43. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 94 / 140 44. Realme 6 93 / 140 45. Umidigi A9 Pro 92 / 140 46. Umidigi Bison 92 / 140 47. Tcl 30 Se 92 / 140 48. Oukitel C21 89.5 / 140 49. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 89 / 140 50. Xiaomi Mi A3 89 / 140 51. Motorola G8 Power 89 / 140 52. Nokia 5.3 89 / 140 53. Oneplus Nord N100 88.5 / 140 54. Honor 9x 88 / 140 55. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 86 / 140 56. Meizu Note 9 86 / 140 57. Unihertz Tank 85 / 120 58. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 85 / 140 59. Poco M5 84.5 / 120 60. Umidigi S3 Pro 83 / 140 61. Samsung Galaxy A21s 82 / 140 62. Umidigi F2 82 / 140 63. Oukitel Wp18 81 / 140 64. Redmi 9a 81 / 140 65. Redmi 9c 80 / 140 66. Ulefone Armor 7e 80 / 140 67. Doogee S58 Pro 78.5 / 140 68. Honor 8x 78 / 140 69. Umidigi F1 77 / 140 70. Huawei Y6 2019 74 / 140 71. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro 57 / 70 72. Redmi 10a 14 / 20 73. Elephone U5 0 / 0
Test / Review conclusion
[b]As I wrote above, I have bought all the phones in the T Pro range since the Mi 9T Pro, so I have a historical basis to compare the evolution of this range. The most visible evolution is the price because this 11T started its marketing beyond 500 € where the Mi 9T Pro had been launched between 300 and 400 €. This year is undoubtedly a little special because the shortage of stock at the global level has pushed up the prices of the phones, the price will therefore perhaps return to a more normal level in a few months. [b][b] Ok, the price has increased but is this justified? I don't think there is anything very new about this phone that would justify the price hike. That doesn't mean it's a bad phone, no it's a good phone but for a price over € 500 it's not my first choice. I'm going to stop talking about the price, that's not the point of the test anyway, let's move on to the evaluation of the phone. [b][b] The Xiaomi 11T takes ingredients from other Xiaomi / Poco phones to tickle the top of the range of other brands. The level of finish is impeccable even if the phone is heavy and imposing. The screen offers a very good experience in terms of its resolution as well as its colors or its contrast. Xiaomi also did not neglect the radio part with good network sensitivity for calls and very good download speed. [b][b] For the photo part on the other hand, I am a little disappointed because the 11T is a phone with a premium positioning but it uses the same sensor as the Redmi Note 10 Pro. This 108 million pixel sensor is not a bad sensor, but it does have some weaknesses that have no place in the high end. This sensor has incorrect colorimetry and will require you to use pro mode to bring the colorimetry to an acceptable level. [b][b] Even though the T range does not claim a performance oriented positioning, the performance of this phone is excellent. So you'll be able to run just about any game or app without the phone slowing down. If you use it very intensively, you will feel a slight increase in temperature, but without feeling any discomfort. [b][b] I only found one real weakness in this phone, the wifi signal was pretty average and even though the signal is not bad this score is too low for a phone of this range. [b][b] The 11T is therefore a good phone overall, but its biggest weakness is its price.[b]Strengths[b]Good performance [b] Network sensitivity [b] WiFi speed [b] Battery charging speed [b] Sound quality [b] Screen quality [b][b][b]Weaknesses[b]Wifi signal just average [b] Photo / video [b] Very greedy screen at 100% [b][b][b]Alternatives to this product[b][b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]
Laurent Willen Instead of watching nonsense on TV or YouTube, I spend my time in the evenings testing products and sharing my passion for technology, travel and photography.
I run this site in my own name and completely independently, no one pays me to do so.
I have more than 20 years of experience in the digital world, I have managed and developed many high traffic websites in companies in Belgium such as Mobistar, Microsoft, Immoweb, BrusselsAirlines, Proximus, Orange,...
This blog is not my main activity, I receive more than 2000 emails per year that I have to answer in my free time. To be able to continue to help you, you can support me by purchasing your products through my links. It costs you absolutely nothing and it keeps me going.
Common Questions / Answers: - I'm a freelance blogger, I don't work for Amazon, Aliexpress, Gearbest, ... so I can't help you with your orders. - I do not write sponsored articles. - you can unsubscribe from alerts using the unsubscribe link in each email.
test
Welcome to my blog!
My tests are more detailed than on most other sites. I am totally independent and nobody pays me to test a product.
If you don't have the time or desire to read the general conditions, here is a summary: - I don't use your data - I only use Google Analytics for my statistics - I have voluntarily blocked external scripts that can use your data - I only display one advertisement per visit and you can choose it.
On which site do you usually buy?
This blog is written completely independently and its content is not influenced by the advertisers present on certain pages. There are some pages that generate affiliate income with companies like Amazon, Aliexpress, Gearbest, and many more. More informations? Consult the general conditions
LAURENTWILLEN.BE
Laurent Willen
