Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro : test / review
Category: Tests / ReviewsThe year 2020 was marked by numerous releases at Xiaomi, sometimes using the Xiaomi brand, sometimes Redmi and sometimes Poco. [b][b]Xiaomi is undoubtedly the manufacturer that releases the most models each year. Their secret? Recycling! I thought Xiaomi was very innovative a year or two ago and now I have the impression that they are slowing down a bit by reusing components from several phones to make a new one with just a small difference that justifies a different price positioning and a different name. There is something to get lost in it![b][b]The Mi 10T Pro takes the format of a Poco X3 with side scan, the size of the Poco F2 Pro, the photo sensor of the Mi Note 10 or Mi 10, the CPU and GPU of the Poco F2 Pro. I imagine that other less visible components are also shared. So there is nothing new in this Mi 10T Pro and yet it was sold for over €500. [b][b]I'm not used to buying phones at this price but I took advantage of the Rue Du Commerce trade-in pack so that they could take it back when I had finished testing it. What motivated me to buy it is the presence of the 108 million pixel sensor, I'm finally going to be able to test this sensor and compare it with everything I've been able to test so far.[b][b][b][b]Manufacturer web site: https://www.mi.com[b]Site where I have bought the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro: https://tidd.ly/34Be1MH[b]
Structure of my tests
I test the phones according to a pre-established structure (see below) to provide you with as much information as possible. Unfortunately, this takes a long time. Some tests like network performance tests take several days and for photo tests I sometimes have to wait until the weather is suitable to take pictures in good conditions. I am therefore obliged to publish the tests step by step, so I invite you to come back if the test is not complete at the time of your visit.[b]How are my tests different from others on the web?
- I usually buy the devices with my own money, so price is just as important as you are!
- I keep the devices for at least a few weeks (sometimes more) to see what they are worth in real conditions.
- I answer (when possible) your questions to help you decide before you buy
- no one pays me to do these reviews, so I'm completely neutral and independent...
- My pages are not filled with ads
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: test / review
Xiaomi Mi Watch Lite : test / review
Redmi 9C test / review
Umidigi A9 Pro test / review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro : test / review
Poco M3 : test / review
Umidigi Bison: test / review
Redmi 9A test / review
Poco X3 test / review
Oukitel C21 : test / review
Price Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
The list below shows the prices for the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro from more than 50 sites around the world. If you are not satisfied with any price, you can subscribe to a price alert to be the first to be notified when the price drops.[b]Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 8 GB 5G Dual-Sim 256 GB schwarz -ohne simlock- NEU!...
2021-01-20 14:11
580 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro - 6GB/128GB - Plata Lunar (Desbloqueado) (SIM doble)...
2021-01-21 21:16
406 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro - 128GB - Lunar Silver (Ohne Simlock) (Dual SIM) Brandneu!!...
2021-01-21 21:12
430 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 10T (Pantalla 6.67" Fhd+ Dotdisplay, 6Gb+128Gb, Cámara de 64Mp, Snapdragon 865 5G, 5.000M...
2021-01-22 02:02
432 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 10T Snapdragon 865 6GB+128GB Smartphone - EU versione...
2021-01-20 08:01
499 USD
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro - 128GB - Cosmic Black (Ohne Simlock) (Dual SIM)...
2021-01-21 21:12
450 EUR
The above links are affiliate links from companies such as Amazon, Gearbest, Aliexpress,... If you appreciate my work, I would be grateful if you could purchase these products through these links. It costs you absolutely nothing but I get a small commission that allows me to buy the material I test. Thank you very much!
Timeline
11/12/2020 order of the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro on Rue Du Commerce with trade-in package[b]14/12/2020 delivery of the phone, the test can begin[b][b]Why this phone?
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is not in my usual selection criteria because it is too expensive but I made an exception for two reasons. The first one is the RueDuCommerce Trade-in Pack and thanks to this trade-in pack, I don't have to worry about resale. The second is the Samsung camera that produces photos in 108 million pixels. This camera had been launched with the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 which was too slow to handle such photos, it was then used in the Xiaomi Mi 10 (also too expensive). [b][b]As I have been able to test a lot of cameras in the last 2 years, I will be able to analyze the photo quality of this sensor with enough hindsight. [b][b]Xiaomi is doing a lot of recycling at the moment, you have to see this Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro as a Poco F2 Pro with another camera.[b][b][b]Unpacking
4
Length : 165.1
Width : 76.4
Thickness : 9.3
Weight : 218
Jack output : No
Width : 76.4
Thickness : 9.3
Weight : 218
Jack output : No
First configuration
The configuration of the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is common to the phones using MIUI 12, it doesn't present any difficulty but I deplore that with each new version Xiaomi pushes its Cloud in a more and more subtle way. As I often change phone, the only cloud option for me is Google's cloud but this could change when Google Photos becomes pay-per-use from June 2021.[b][b]Finish
12
Specifications
[b]The information below comes from the Device Info HW application. The application provides detailed technical information about the tested phone.I bought the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro in its 8Gb / 256 Gb version, you will find the main features in the following screens.[b][b]
13
CPU / GPU Performance
CPU : Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
GPU : Qualcomm AdreNo 650 600 Mhz
Memory (RAM) : 8 GB
GPU : Qualcomm AdreNo 650 600 Mhz
Memory (RAM) : 8 GB
Benchmark Antutu/3DMark
I scored over 581,000 points on Antutu, the best score I've gotten so far. I got a slightly lower score with the Poco F2 Pro, which costs much less.[b][b]With a score like that you can play any game or run any application. The phone also relies on 8Gb of RAM, so not only will you be able to leave more applications open, but the transition between applications should not be a problem either.[b][b]
3
Antutu score : 581650
Antutu CPU : 178708
Antutu GPU : 221508
Antutu UX : 95350
Antutu Mem : 86089
[b]Top 10 - performance ranking based on AntutuAntutu CPU : 178708
Antutu GPU : 221508
Antutu UX : 95350
Antutu Mem : 86089
1. Oppo Find X2 Pro - 605184
2. Oneplus 8t - 595000
3. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro - 581650
4. Oneplus 8 Pro - 579417
5. Xiaomi Mi 10 - 579114
6. Poco F2 Pro - 569559
7. Samsung Galaxy S20 Fe - 565000
8. Samsung Galaxy S20 - 503905
9. Huawei P40 Pro - 466765
10. Huawei P40 - 466765
Number of smartphones in the ranking:115
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:3/115
Note: this ranking only contains the phones I tested as well as a few others that I added for reference.
[b]Gaming[b]To test the performance in game, I download the mobile PUBG game and evaluate the in-game experience, graphics level and depth of vision. This game is quite demanding and should help you evaluating the performance of a phone.As I wrote above, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro can run any game. PUBG Mobile runs in HD mode by default but it is possible to increase the resolution and detail without causing any slowdown. The textures are well detailed and the depth of vision is maximum.[b][b][b][b]
Network performance
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is compatible with a large number of frequencies and on the 5G part, the phone covers 10 frequencies. At the moment 5G is not yet widespread and there are still questions about which frequencies will be used most. Choosing a 5G phone today therefore carries a risk if it only covers a few frequencies, which is not the case with the Mi 10T Pro. [b][b]4G frequencies : B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B20 (800), B28 (700), B32 (1500), B38 (TDD 2600), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500)
5G frequencies : n1 (2100), n3 (1800), n7 (2600), n8 (900), n20 (800), n28 (700), n38 (2600), n41 (2500), n77 (3700), n78 (3500)
Bluetooth : Bluetooth 5.1 LE
SAR / head : 0.574
SAR / body : 0.996
Number measurements : 1071
Average signal (reference) : -90.61
Average signal (telephone) : -94.03
Average deviation reference/telephone : -3.42
Min/Max signal (reference) : -88 / -94
Min/Max signal (phone) : -94 / -96
5G frequencies : n1 (2100), n3 (1800), n7 (2600), n8 (900), n20 (800), n28 (700), n38 (2600), n41 (2500), n77 (3700), n78 (3500)
Bluetooth : Bluetooth 5.1 LE
SAR / head : 0.574
SAR / body : 0.996
Number measurements : 1071
Average signal (reference) : -90.61
Average signal (telephone) : -94.03
Average deviation reference/telephone : -3.42
Min/Max signal (reference) : -88 / -94
Min/Max signal (phone) : -94 / -96
Choose your country to check if your phone is compatible:
The frequencies displayed below will allow you to see if this phone is compatible with your operator or if you will be able to use it in the country where you are going on vacation.
The frequencies displayed below will allow you to see if this phone is compatible with your operator or if you will be able to use it in the country where you are going on vacation.
Signal 4G (before december 2020)[b]The ability to pick up the network correctly is an essential element for a phone but it is only very rarely measured. To measure a phone's ability to pick up the network, I perform a large number of measurements on the same cells to be able to compare phones under similar conditions. The signal is measured in dBm, a value of -90dBm indicates a worse signal than -70dBm. These measurements are therefore taken under real conditions and not in a laboratory, they are not scientific but give a good indication of performance. [b][b]Network signal sensitivity rating
| Phone tested: | Average signal (dBm) | Number of measurements: |
| Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro | -88 | 1600 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | -91.305 | 600 |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite | -93 | 788 |
| Samsung Galaxy A70 | -94.511 | 1975 |
| Nokia 5.3 | -94.98 | 531 |
| Realme 6 | -95.14 | 2301 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro | -95.922 | 1599 |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | -95.95 | 1000 |
| Huawei Y6 2019 | -95.95 | 1199 |
| Doogee S58 Pro | -96.22 | 856 |
| Redmi 9a | -96.48 | 1000 |
| Meizu Note 9 | -96.68 | 937 |
| Motorola G8 Power | -96.88 | 1032 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | -97.01 | 1430 |
| Redmi 9c | -97.04 | 1000 |
| Umidigi S3 Pro | -97.13 | 1200 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | -97.34 | 879 |
| Samsung Galaxy A21s | -97.78 | 1000 |
| Umidigi F1 | -97.82 | 298 |
| Ulefone Armor 7e | -98.7 | 1000 |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | -99 | 1000 |
| Honor 9x | -99.14 | 899 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s | -99.4 | 1860 |
| Poco F2 Pro | -99.8 | 1247 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | -100.79 | 1785 |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g | -100.88 | 1198 |
| Poco X3 | -101.19 | 821 |
| Umidigi F2 | -101.47 | 712 |
| Phone tested: | Measurements | Avg signal (reference) | Avg signal (phone) | Min/Max (reference) | Min/Max (phone) |
| Samsung Galaxy S10+ | 457 | -93.06 | -97.39 | -89 / -98 | -97 / -99 |
| Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro | 669 | -93.69 | -95.84 | -90 / -95 | -92 / -98 |
| Poco F2 Pro | 1438 | -91.02 | -94.99 | -89 / -94 | -94 / -96 |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g | 1645 | -90.77 | -95.02 | - 88 / -98 | -95 / -100 |
| Poco X3 | 821 | -94.89 | -103.19 | -91 / -97.7 | -101 / -104 |
| Umidigi Bison | 2343 | -92.71 | -96.46 | -90 / -99 | -94 / -102 |
| Oukitel C21 | 1101 | -92.04 | -94.99 | -90 / -97 | -92 / -95 |
| Poco M3 | 1116 | -92.09 | -91.74 | -88 / -98 | -90 / -99 |
| Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro | 1071 | -90.61 | -94.03 | -88 / -94 | -94 / -96 |
| Umidigi A9 Pro | 981 | -90.40 | -94.01 | -88 / -95 | -93 / -95 |
1. Samsung Galaxy S20 D:351Mbps U: 20Mbps
2. Poco X3 D:232Mbps U: 55Mbps
3. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g D:223Mbps U: 52Mbps
4. Poco F2 Pro D:207Mbps U: 53Mbps
5. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite D:153Mbps U: 68Mbps
6. Xiaomi Mi A3 D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
8. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite D:149Mbps U: 60Mbps
9. Samsung Galaxy A21s D:147Mbps U: 51Mbps
10. Huawei Y6 2019 D:145Mbps U: 61Mbps
Number of smartphones in the ranking:30
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/30
Note: the theoretical maximum speed of a telephone is often limited by the configuration of the mobile network and the congestion of the network at the time of the measurement. So maybe you could get a higher speed on another network
[b][b]
Wifi performance
To test a phone's ability to receive the network properly, I take measurements near my router and then remotely (and always at the same place). This gives me an average in dBm where a value of -90 dBm indicates poorer performance than a value at -30 dBm.[b]Wifi frequencies : 802.11a , 802.11b , 802.11g , 802.11n , 802.11n 5GHz , 802.11ac, WiFi 6 (802.11ax)
Wifi signal[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]Top 10 - wifi sensitivity ranking1. Poco F2 Pro -11dBm
2. Samsung Galaxy A21s -13dBm
3. Poco X3 -17dBm
4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s -18dBm
5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro -19dBm
6. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite -19dBm
7. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g -19dBm
8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 -19dBm
9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 -19dBm
10. Redmi 9a -19dBm
Number of smartphones in the ranking:33
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/33
[b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the speed in Wifi, I connect to my router in 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz (if available) and use the Ookla application to measure the speed.[b]Top 10 - wifi download speed ranking
1. Samsung Galaxy S20 351Mbps
2. Poco F2 Pro 341Mbps
3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 319Mbps
4. Umidigi Bison 306Mbps
5. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g 300Mbps
6. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 260Mbps
7. Poco X3 251Mbps
8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 250Mbps
9. Umidigi F1 220Mbps
10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 211Mbps
Number of smartphones in the ranking:33
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/33
Note: I have a 400Mbps line and a modem capable of delivering higher speed, but I can never be sure how much bandwidth is available when doing a test.
[b]
GPS performance
[b]To test the quality of the GPS signal I use the Offline Maps application and I make the same train trip in pedestrian mode. Why? In pedestrian mode, the GPS does not artificially correct the signal to stick to the road, it has no markings, so you can see the actual position. I then use an application to measure the accuracy of the signal. Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]Top 10 - GPS accuracy ranking1. Oukitel C21 1m
2. Redmi 9a 1m
3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1m
4. Redmi 9c 2m
5. Umidigi Bison 2m
6. Samsung Galaxy A21s 4m
Number of smartphones in the ranking:7
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/7
Note: An accuracy of 3 meters or less can easily be corrected by a good GPS application. Phone performance also plays a role in how fast your display updates, so good accuracy could be compromised by too slow a display.
[b]
Battery range
Capacity : 5000
W max : 33
Range (100% brightness) : 724
Charging time : 175
From March 2020, I replaced my subjective battery test with a technical test to better measure the real behaviour of the battery. Now I test the autonomy and charging time under absolutely identical conditions. I perform several measurements, so this test alone takes several days during which I cannot use the phone for anything else.W max : 33
Range (100% brightness) : 724
Charging time : 175
Battery life - methodology
To test the battery life, I measure the battery consumption every minute in strictly identical conditions to be able to compare phones and also to allow you to evaluate your phone in the same conditions. I rule out any influence of applications that could interfere with the measurement. The autonomy is not linear, the battery sometimes discharges much faster at the end. This is a frustrating phenomenon but with my measurements, you will know if you need to find a charger quickly.
Battery life
The battery of the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has discharged from 100% to 1% in 724 minutes with 100% brightness, it has discharged from 100% to 1% in minutes with 50% brightness. I obtain in this way an average discharge speed of % per minute with 100% luminosity and % per minute with 50% luminosity, the consumption is therefore mA per minute with 100% luminosity and with 50% luminosity. To be able to compare the efficiency of the phone and its influence on the battery, you have to compare the (or 50%) score with that of other smartphones, the figure should be as low as possible.
Charging time - methodology
To test the charging time, I always use the same charger with the same cable. I measure the charging time minute by minute to see the evolution of the charge as well as the charging speed. The charging speed of a battery is not linear, it is often faster at the beginning and slower at the end. The charger is compatible with fast charging.
Charging time
The battery of the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has been charged from 1% to 100% in 175 minutes. This gives me an average charging speed of % per minute and therefore an increase of mA per minute. To compare the performance of the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro compared to other phones, you should use the per minute score, this score should be as high as possible.
Important note: the charging speed is not always linear, the graph below gives you an indication of the battery behaviour.
The following table lists the phones tested with the technical battery test, they are ranked in order of efficiency. A higher battery capacity should logically result in a higher battery life but it is not always the case and it does not give any indication of the efficiency of a phone.
| Smartphone | Capacity (mAh) | Battery life (minutes) | Efficiency Score | Battery life (minutes) / 50% | Efficiency Score / 50% | Charging time | .Score charging |
| Oukitel C21 | 4000 | 497.00 | 8.05 | 1324.00 | 3.02 | 167.00 | 23.95 |
| Honor 9x | 4000 | 770.00 | 5.19 | 1333.00 | 3.00 | 151.00 | 26.49 |
| Nokia 5.3 | 4000 | 549.00 | 7.29 | 1096.00 | 3.65 | 199.00 | 20.10 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | 4000 | 565.00 | 7.08 | 1217.00 | 3.29 | 136.00 | 29.41 |
| Umidigi A9 Pro | 4150 | 552.00 | 7.52 | 1562.00 | 2.66 | 112.00 | 37.05 |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g | 4160 | 749.00 | 5.55 | 1541.00 | 2.70 | 163.00 | 25.52 |
| Realme 6 | 4300 | 704.00 | 6.11 | 1104.00 | 3.89 | 162.00 | 26.54 |
| Poco F2 Pro | 4700 | 1150.00 | 4.09 | 1536.00 | 3.06 | 180.00 | 26.11 |
| Redmi 9c | 5000 | 656.00 | 7.62 | 1915.00 | 2.61 | 170.00 | 29.41 |
| Umidigi Bison | 5000 | 550.00 | 9.09 | 1471.00 | 3.40 | 238.00 | 21.01 |
| Redmi 9a | 5000 | 694.00 | 7.20 | 1902.00 | 2.63 | 195.00 | 25.64 |
| Motorola G8 Power | 5000 | 912.00 | 5.48 | 2792.00 | 1.79 | 311.00 | 16.08 |
| Samsung Galaxy A21s | 5000 | 729.00 | 6.86 | 1283.00 | 3.90 | 166.00 | 30.12 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | 5020 | 650.00 | 7.72 | 1808.00 | 2.78 | 162.00 | 30.99 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s | 5020 | 663.00 | 7.57 | 1876.00 | 2.68 | 224.00 | 22.41 |
| Umidigi F2 | 5150 | 927.00 | 5.56 | 1854.00 | 2.78 | 299.00 | 17.22 |
| Poco X3 | 5160 | 653.00 | 7.90 | 1654.00 | 3.12 | 181.00 | 28.51 |
| Doogee S58 Pro | 5180 | 845.00 | 6.13 | 1908.00 | 2.71 | 177.00 | 29.27 |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | 5260 | 827.00 | 6.36 | 1609.00 | 3.27 | 208.00 | 25.29 |
| Ulefone Armor 7e | 5500 | 768.00 | 7.16 | 1140.00 | 4.82 | 179.00 | 30.73 |
| Poco M3 | 6000 | 842.00 | 7.13 | 1898.00 | 3.16 | 217.00 | 27.65 |
How to read these figures?
The battery capacity is an important element in determining the autonomy of a phone but it is not the only factor. A phone with a large battery may have a shorter battery life if it consumes more power. If I had to take an example from everyday life, I would use the universe of the car. If a car has a large fuel tank, it should be able to drive a longer distance unless its average fuel consumption is higher. The battery efficiency score works the same way, it should be as low as possible and represents the energy consumption of the phone. These differences in efficiency are often related to the brightness of the screen, large bright screens will tend to consume more energy and even if they have a large battery, their range will be shorter.
In summary Not yet available / tested[b][b]
Photo camera test
To test the quality of photos produced by a phone, I do a technical test (resolution, sharpness, chromatic aberration,...) in studio (identical conditions) to evaluate the technical part objectively. From the second half of 2020, I built my own laboratory to take completely objective technical measurements. I then take pictures in real conditions to see how the camera performs. I then evaluate these photos according to my criteria but I publish the photos so that you can evaluate the result according to your criteria.[b]Hardware
Selfie / resolution : 20
Selfie / sensor : Samsung S5K3T2
Resolution : 108
Sensor : Samsung Bright S5KHMX
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is equipped with a 108 million pixel Samsung Bright S5KHMX sensor. This sensor was first released with the Xiaomi Mi Note 10, so it is not a new sensor but it has always been considered as one of the best sensors. I hadn't had the opportunity to test it yet, so I will finally be able to compare it with the other sensors I have tested so far.[b][b]Phones equipped with the Samsung Bright S5KHMX are often more expensive than those sold with high-end Sony sensors. Maybe that's why this Mi 10T Pro is so expensive.[b][b]Default app[b]Xiaomi's photo application has improved a lot with MIUI 12. I found that Xiaomi's photo application had become too busy with its many options. The main menu has been simplified and it is possible to customize the items in this menu to keep only what you are interested in. The "Plus" option has become a catch-all in which you will find all the additional options such as: night mode, slow motion mode, accelerated mode, document mode, vlog mode, pro mode, ...[b][b]The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is also compatible with Gcam, so I will compare the result obtained with the Xiaomi application to see if Gcam manages to increase the quality of the photos.[b][b][b]Selfie / sensor : Samsung S5K3T2
Resolution : 108
Sensor : Samsung Bright S5KHMX
Photoquality
Photo test / studio[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]Photo test / sunny[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]Photo test / cloudy[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]Test photo / night[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]Video quality
Stabilisation[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]Video normale conditionsNot yet available / tested[b][b]Video low light[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]Audio quality
To test the quality of the phone's audio output, I connect the device's audio output to a measuring tool, then play sounds on all frequencies and measure the differences between the original sound and the sound produced by the phone. In this way I measure the phone's ability to correctly reproduce all sounds.[b] Frequency Response[b]This test is intended to test the device's ability to correctly reproduce all frequencies. The white line in the middle of the graph is the ideal situation and the other colors come from tests on different phones. A deviation from the reference line indicates a deviation from the ideal situation. To see good sound at all frequencies, it is therefore necessary to get as close as possible to the reference line. Not yet available / tested[b][b]Dynamic Range[b]This test is designed to test a phone's ability to play sounds at different volume levels. Here too, the phones must be as close as possible to the reference.Not yet available / tested[b][b]Noise Level[b]This test aims to identify if the device under test is able to reproduce sounds without too much noise. A high score indicates a low parasite rate, a lower score indicates a higher presence of parasites.Not yet available / tested[b][b]Concert recording[b]The purpose of this test is to measure the recording quality of the phone when there is a lot of ambient noise. Since I don't have the opportunity to go to a concert every time I test a phone, I simulate the noise of a concert in a closed environment.Not yet available / tested[b][b]Screen quality
To test the screen, I use a colorimetric probe that measures the color accuracy of a screen, as well as other parameters to see if a screen is able to correctly reproduce an image. I also test the brightness level to determine if the screen will be able to display an image in full sunlight.[b]Screen size : 6.67
Resolution : 1080x2400
Ratio : 20:9
Type : LCD IPS
% occupancy : 85
dE white : 1.5
dE red : 0.6
dE green : 0.4
dE blue : 1.1
dE jaune : 1.2
dE cyan : 0.5
dE magenta : 0.5
White temperature : 6663
Contrast : 1328:1
Brightness : 530
Colorimetry[b]The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is equipped with an IPS LCD screen where most phones sold at over €500 are equipped with an Amoled screen. Why is this a problem? Amoled screens offer a much better contrast than LCD screens, the blacks are really black whereas with an LCD the black will always be a bit grey. At this price level, I don't find it normal to have a screen like this.[b][b]Resolution : 1080x2400
Ratio : 20:9
Type : LCD IPS
% occupancy : 85
dE white : 1.5
dE red : 0.6
dE green : 0.4
dE blue : 1.1
dE jaune : 1.2
dE cyan : 0.5
dE magenta : 0.5
White temperature : 6663
Contrast : 1328:1
Brightness : 530
1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g dE = 0.73
2. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro dE = 0.83
3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 dE = 1.2
4. Samsung Galaxy S20 dE = 1.4
5. Poco M3 dE = 1.4
6. Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite dE = 1.46
7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s dE = 1.47
8. Honor 9x dE = 1.5
9. Poco F2 Pro dE = 1.73
10. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite dE = 1.91
Number of smartphones in the ranking:35
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:2/35
Note: the colorimetric difference is measured in dE. After three, the human eye will perceive a colorimetric difference, so the dE should be the lowest. The tests were all carried out with a colorimetric probe.
[b]Brightness / Contrast[b]I measured a brightness of 530 cd/m² with my probe, I have activated the sun mode but I think the screen is capable of going a little higher. I didn't have a light source strong enough to make sure the brightness was at maximum.[b][b]With this level of brightness you can use the screen outdoors without any problems.[b][b]Light Absorption/Reflection[b]The smartphone screen reflect light and sometimes turn them into a real mirror. This mirror effect makes it harder to read. [b][b]The absorption index below indicates the percentage of light absorbed by the screen. The readability of a screen is better when the absorption index is high.[b][b]
| Phone tested: | % light absorption |
| Samsung Galaxy S10+ | 58 |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | 52 |
| Honor 9x | 65 |
| Redmi Note 9s | 55 |
| Motorola G8 Power | 60 |
| Realme 6 | 54 |
| Umidigi F2 | 48 |
| Poco F2 Pro | 52 |
| Redmi Note 9 | 56 |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | 53 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | 47 |
| Samsung Galaxy A21s | 53 |
Biometry
Not yet available / tested[b][b]Operating system
[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]Encoutered bugs
Not yet available / tested[b][b]Accessories Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
To better enjoy your experience with your smartphone, I offer links to all kinds of accessories that you might find usefulProtective cover / case xiaomi mi 10t pro
Screen protection film xiaomi mi 10t pro
Memory card xiaomi mi 10t pro
USB Cable / Charger xiaomi mi 10t pro
Headphones xiaomi mi 10t pro
Bike rack xiaomi mi 10t pro
Compare Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro with the others
I assigned a score of 1 to 10 for each test that determines the strengths and weaknesses of a product. I am using 0 for criteria that have not (yet) been tested. A score of 1 to 3 indicates poor performance (and yes, it does), a score of 4 to 6 indicates average performance, a score of 7 to 8 indicates good performance, and a score of 9 and 10 indicates exceptional performance. .The score is calculated based on my measurements and when there are no measurements, it is a subjective opinion based on my experience.
The scores are not static, they change over time because the performance of new products changes and this must be taken into account.
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro | ||
| Finish quality | 8 | 6.00 |
| CPU performance | 9 | 6.5 |
| GPU performance | 9 | 6.5 |
| Screen quality | 8 | 7.00 |
| Frequency coverage | 7 | 7.00 |
| Audio quality | 8 | 6.00 |
| Operating system | 8 | 8.00 |
| Overall score | 57 | 89 |
1. Samsung Galaxy S20 112 / 140
2. Poco F2 Pro 111 / 140
3. Samsung Galaxy S10+ 107 / 140
4. Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro 106 / 140
5. Poco X3 102 / 140
6. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g 101 / 140
7. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 101 / 140
8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 100 / 140
9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s 98 / 140
10. Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 98 / 140
11. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 97 / 140
12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 94 / 140
13. Realme 6 93 / 140
14. Umidigi Bison 92 / 140
15. Umidigi A9 Pro 92 / 140
16. Oukitel C21 89.5 / 140
17. Xiaomi Mi A3 89 / 140
18. Motorola G8 Power 89 / 140
19. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 89 / 140
20. Nokia 5.3 89 / 140
21. Honor 9x 88 / 140
22. Meizu Note 9 86 / 140
23. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 86 / 140
24. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 85 / 140
25. Umidigi S3 Pro 83 / 140
26. Samsung Galaxy A21s 82 / 140
27. Umidigi F2 82 / 140
28. Redmi 9a 81 / 140
29. Redmi 9c 80 / 140
30. Ulefone Armor 7e 80 / 140
31. Doogee S58 Pro 78.5 / 140
32. Honor 8x 78 / 140
33. Poco M3 77.5 / 110
34. Umidigi F1 77 / 140
35. Huawei Y6 2019 74 / 140
36. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro 57 / 70
37. Elephone U5 0 / 0