Realme is a new Chinese smartphone manufacturer, the company was founded in 2018 by a former Oppo executive. [b][b]Realme launched its first smartphones in Europe in 2019 and the overall feedback was quite positive for such a young brand.[b][b]Realme is often compared to Xiaomi because its positioning is very similar, offering high-performance phones at an attractive price. With the imminent launch of the next Xiaomi blockbuster (Redmi Note 9), it was for me the opportunity to finally test a Realme smartphone.[b][b][b][b]linkManufacturer web site:https://www.realme.com/eu/[b]
Structure of my tests
I test the phones according to a pre-established structure (see below) to provide you with as much information as possible. Unfortunately, this takes a long time. Some tests like network performance tests take several days and for photo tests I sometimes have to wait until the weather is suitable to take pictures in good conditions. I am therefore obliged to publish the tests step by step, so I invite you to come back if the test is not complete at the time of your visit.[b] [device_intro device="smartphone" lg="en"]
Price Realme 6
The list below shows the prices for the Realme 6 from more than 50 sites around the world. If you are not satisfied with any price, you can subscribe to a price alert to be the first to be notified when the price drops.[b]
helpThe above links are affiliate links from companies such as Amazon, Gearbest, Aliexpress,... If you appreciate my work, I would be grateful if you could purchase these products through these links. It costs you absolutely nothing but I get a small commission that allows me to buy the material I test. Thank you very much!
Timeline
31/03/2020 Purchase of Realme 6 on the official website of Realme Europe[b]06/04/2020 Phone reception and unpacking[b][b]
Why this phone?
I mainly buy smartphones between €150 and €250 that meet a number of criteria. Xiaomi is very present in this price range, so I tested several models of this brand but more and more Chinese manufacturers are trying to occupy this price territory and Realme is one of them.[b][b]Why Realme? The opinions on the first models are very positive and this is very rare for such a young brand, so I was curious to see if Realme had succeeded in the incredible challenge of competing with Xiaomi in only 2 years of existence.[b][b]
Unpacking
The startup procedure for the Realme 6 is very similar to what is used on other Android phones, but it takes a different direction from the configuration of the fingerprint sensor. The Realme 6 uses a fingerprint sensor located on the power button, I think it's a great idea but on the other hand the configuration of this type of fingerprint sensor is less intuitive, you have to find the ideal position of the thumb. From the fingerprint, you enter an interface designed by Realme but Realme doesn't try to register you to all kinds of services, you just have to choose if you want to activate the assistant.[b][b]
15add_a_photo
[b][b]
Lengte : 162.1 Breedte : 74.8 Dikte : 9.6 Gewicht : 191 Jack uitgang : Ja Type USB : Type C USB norm : 2.0
First configuration
[b]The Realme 6 comes in a large yellow box, it's a very unusual color but it probably corresponds to a desire to stand out in a world where all smartphones look the same. The box is almost twice as high as the other smartphones I bought at the same time. Why is this box so big? Probably because of the charger and the USB cable, both are very thick. The phone comes with a protective case but it is packed separately, this probably also explains why the box is so big. [b][b]The box contains the phone, a soft and transparent protective shell, a wall charger, a USB cable, a pocket with the manual and the needle to open the SIM drawer.[b][b]
3add_a_photo
[b][b]
Finish
[b]I had never tested a Realme phone before, I had no point of comparison or expectation in particular. In this price range, my reference is the Redmi Note 8 Pro. I was positively surprised by this Realme 6, it offers a very good level of finish and it gives a good impression of quality. All this is of course subjective but it plays a role on the perception that one can have of a phone. The materials chosen are smooth and uniform, they don't deform to the touch and the phone is quite elegant. [b][b]The Realme is about the same size as the Redmi Note 8 Pro but is thicker. The thickness is often justified by a larger battery but this is not the case here, the battery offers 4300 mAh, this is good but not exceptional. The Realme offers a screen diagonal of 6.5 inches like the Redmi Note 8 pro and it also offers an 84% occupancy of the surface. These two devices are therefore very similar in their format.[b][b]
[b]The Realme is perfectly smooth on top, like the Umidigi F2, not even a small hole to capture sound. The loudspeaker is very thin but quite wide, I will have to check in use if it is easy to position the ear correctly. The contrast between the black part and the blue part of the phone is very uniform, it gives the impression that the phone is made of two different pieces. The whole is quite elegant.[b][b]
[b]At the bottom, the Realme 6 has a grid for a loudspeaker, a USB type C port, an audio jack connector and two holes that are probably used to capture sound.[b][b][b][b]
[b]For the sides, Realme has decided to make the same bet as Samsung on some of its models. The volume buttons are located on the left side of the device with the SIM drawer. On the right you have the power button with its integrated fingerprint sensor. As most phones have volume buttons on the right, you really have to get used to using your phone differently with the Realme 6. I had already had this problem with the Samsung Galaxy S10+ and since I don't use the phones for more than a month or two, I don't really have time to get used to a layout like this, I always have the reflex to go for the volume on the left. This positioning is also problematic for the use with one hand because a priori if you are right-handed, you will have your thumb on the right, you'll need a large hand to be able to manipulate the volume on the other side, it is not impossible but it is not practical.[b][b]
[b]Xiaomi regularly uses colors with a gradient on the back of their phones, sometimes it looks good result, sometimes it doesn't and in the end it's also a matter of taste. Realme has chosen a slightly milky blue gradient that loses intensity on the vertical axis and ends with metallic grey. The camera is located at the top left and is composed of 4 sensors that stand out quite strongly from the back of the phone despite its already thick. The protective cover supplied with the phone helps to attenuate this effect. [b][b][b]
[b]The 6.5 inch screen occupies 84% of the front of the phone, which is a good score. The front camera is positioned in the screen like some Samsung or Huawei, the sensor is quite discreet and well integrated. The borders are visible but thin enough not to notice them, the Realme does not distinguish itself from the competition at this level.[b][b]
11add_a_photo
[b][b]
Specifications
[b]The information below comes from the Device Info HW application. The application provides detailed technical information about the tested phone.The Realme 6 is similar to the Redmi Note 8 Pro in many ways, what distinguishes it from the Redmi is its screen refresh rate, it is the only phone in this price range to offer a 90hz refresh rate. What does this mean concretely? The screen will display the images with a higher frequency, this has the effect of making the movements more fluid.[b][b]
10add_a_photo
[b][b]
CPU / GPU Performance
CPU : MediaTek Helio G90T GPU : Mali G76 Geheugen (RAM) : 4 - 8 Gb Opslagcapaciteit : 64-128 Gb
[b][b]The Realme 6 is equipped with a MediaTek Helio G90T processor and a Mali G76 graphics processor, this is exactly the same configuration as the Redmi Note 8 Pro, this shows the willingness of Realme to compete with this Xiaomi. This combination offers a good performance at all levels that will allow a huge majority of users to find their happiness. Only demanding gamers will go for a more powerful model but in this price range, the Redmi Note 8 Pro and Realme 6 are probably the best.[b][b]
Benchmark Antutu/3DMark
With Antutu I got a score of 287165 points, which is much higher than the score I got with Redmi Note 8 Pro which uses the same components. Realme has probably managed to better optimize the use of these components, so Realme offers a better performance than Redmi.[b][b]
4add_a_photo
[b][b] With 3DMark I got a score very similar to the one obtained with the Redmi Note 8 Pro. With such a score, you won't have any problem with most of the games.[b][b]
Antutu score : 287165 Antutu CPU : 97128 Antutu GPU : 78787 Antutu UX : 56963 Antutu Mem : 54287 3D Mark Open GL : 2533 3D Mark Vulkan : 2589
[b]Top 10 - prestatieclassificatie op basis van Antutu 1. Poco F4 Gt - 853016 2. Realme Gt - 811858 3. Black Shark 4 Pro - 759986 4. Poco X4 Gt - 714577 5. Oppo Find X2 Pro - 605184 6. Oneplus 8t - 595000 7. Poco F3 - 589677 8. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro - 581650 9. Oneplus 8 Pro - 579417 10. Xiaomi Mi 10 - 579114
Aantal smartphones in de ranglijst:146 Positie van deze smartphone in de ranglijst:49/146
Opmerking: deze ranglijst bevat alleen de telefoons die ik heb getest en enkele andere die ik ter referentie heb toegevoegd. [b]Gaming[b]To test the performance in game, I download the mobile PUBG game and evaluate the in-game experience, graphics level and depth of vision. This game is quite demanding and should help you evaluating the performance of a phone.The Realme 6 scores almost 300,000 points on Antutu and until a year ago, this kind of score was reserved for high-end phones. Today for just over €200 you can get phones like the Realme 6, Redmi Note 8 Pro or Redmi Note 9s that offer very good performance for an affordable price. With this kind of performance, you'll be able to play without any problem a very large majority of games, even 3D FPS like PUBG Mobile below.[b][b][b][b]PUBG Mobile is perfectly smooth, the level of detail is high and the depth of vision is maximum. Even when several players are present in the same area, the game remains overall very smooth.[b][b]
Network performance
The Realme 6 covers most 3G and 4G frequencies used in Europe, so you should be able to use it everywhere even on Free and Bouygues networks in France thanks to the support of the B28 / 700 Mhz frequency.[b][b]
3G frequenties : B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B8 (900) 4G frequencies : B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B20 (800), B28 (700), B38 (TDD 2600), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500) Bluetooth : Bluetooth 5.0 LE SAR / Hoofd : 1.138 SAR / lichaam : 0.586 Volte : Ja NFC : Ja Aantal metingen : 2301 Gemiddelde signaal : -95.14 Download snelheid : 60 Upload snelheid : 60
Kies je land om te controleren of je telefoon compatibel is:
Met de onderstaande frequenties kun je zien of deze telefoon compatibel is met je provider of dat je deze kunt gebruiken waar je op vakantie gaat.
Signal 4G (before december 2020)[b]The ability to pick up the network correctly is an essential element for a phone but it is only very rarely measured. To measure a phone's ability to pick up the network, I perform a large number of measurements on the same cells to be able to compare phones under similar conditions. The signal is measured in dBm, a value of -90dBm indicates a worse signal than -70dBm. These measurements are therefore taken under real conditions and not in a laboratory, they are not scientific but give a good indication of performance. [b][b]Gevoeligheidsclassificatie van netwerksignaal
Telefoon getest:
Gemiddeld signaal (dBm)
Aantal metingen:
Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro
-88
1600
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
-91.305
600
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
-93
788
Samsung Galaxy A70
-94.511
1975
Nokia 5.3
-94.98
531
Realme 6
-95.14
2301
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
-95.922
1599
Xiaomi Mi A3
-95.95
1000
Huawei Y6 2019
-95.95
1199
Doogee S58 Pro
-96.22
856
Redmi 9a
-96.48
1000
Meizu Note 9
-96.68
937
Motorola G8 Power
-96.88
1032
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
-97.01
1430
Redmi 9c
-97.04
1000
Umidigi S3 Pro
-97.13
1200
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
-97.34
879
Samsung Galaxy A21s
-97.78
1000
Umidigi F1
-97.82
298
Ulefone Armor 7e
-98.7
1000
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
-99
1000
Honor 9x
-99.14
899
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s
-99.4
1860
Poco F2 Pro
-99.8
1247
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
-100.79
1785
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g
-100.88
1198
Poco X3
-101.19
821
Umidigi F2
-101.47
712
[b]If there is one domain where the Realme 6 really outperforms the Redmi Note 9s it is the network performance. On more than 2000 measurements, the Realme 6 scores above average where the Redmi Note 9s is below average.[b][b][b]Signal 4G (from December 2020)[b]I decided to change the methodology for measuring the network because I noticed that the configuration of the mobile network changes over time. This makes it more difficult to compare phones because the conditions are no longer exactly the same.[b][b]To overcome this problem, I set up a device that captures 24 hours a day about ten parameters from the mobile network (ex: cell id, rssi, rsrq, snr, frequency,...). I then place the phone next to the device for 24 to 48 hours taking the same measurements so that I can compare them. [b][b] Overview of the phones tested with this methodology[b][b]
Telefoon getest:
Metingen
Gemid. signaal (ref)
Gemid. signaal (phone)
Min/Max (ref)
Min/Max (phone)
Samsung Galaxy S10+
457
-93.06
-97.39
-89 / -98
-97 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro
669
-93.69
-95.84
-90 / -95
-92 / -98
Poco F2 Pro
1438
-91.02
-94.99
-89 / -94
-94 / -96
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g
1645
-90.77
-95.02
- 88 / -98
-95 / -100
Poco X3
821
-94.89
-103.19
-91 / -97.7
-101 / -104
Umidigi Bison
2343
-92.71
-96.46
-90 / -99
-94 / -102
Oukitel C21
1101
-92.04
-94.99
-90 / -97
-92 / -95
Poco M3
1116
-92.09
-91.74
-88 / -98
-90 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro
1071
-90.61
-94.03
-88 / -94
-94 / -96
Umidigi A9 Pro
981
-90.40
-94.01
-88 / -95
-93 / -95
Redmi Note 9t
1201
-92.149
-91.71
-90 / -97
-91 / -97
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
999
-92.35
-93.99
-88 / -97
-92 / -98
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
877
-89.72
-90.56
- 88 / -92
-89 / -95
Poco X3 Pro
1876
-91.45
-92.91
-90 / -94
-90 / -96
Poco F3
1382
-90.79
-94.2
-89 / -94
-93 / -98
Oneplus Nord N100
896
-91.23
-96.005
-88 / - 99
-96 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
2875
-91.36
-91.49
-87 / -96
-90 / -96
Samsung Galaxy A52
1427
-89.27
-93.39
-87 / -98
-92 / -96
Doogee S96 Pro
1259
-94.2
-91.21
-90 / -102
-88 / -95
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s
957
-92.07
-97.62
-90 / -102
-96 / -102
Poco M3 Pro
1247
-91.76
-102.97
-99 / -104
-88 / -98
Realme Gt
843
-96.49
-94.02
-93 / -101
- 92 / -96
F150 R2022
1002
-92.4
-105.1
-90 / -97
-98 / -110
Umidigi Bison Pro
936
-94.2
-104.98
-91 / -98
-95 / -105
Redmi 10
2141
-94.74
-100.92
-92 / -98
-99 / -101
Tcl 10 Pro
871
-93.43
-94.001
-92 / -96
-93 / -95
Poco M4 Pro
570
-93.71
-96.78
-91 / -98
-95 / -99
Google Pixel 5
1444
-91.02
-97.02
-90 / -94
-97 / -101
Xiaomi 11t
1576
-92.305
-92.003
-90 / -96
-92 / -93
Redmi Note 11
1223
-92.5
-91.32
-92/-97
-90 / -93
Black Shark 4 Pro
2383
-95.178
-95.42
-90 / -100
-93 / -101
Redmi Note 11 Pro
349
-95.33
-93
-89 / -101
-92 / -94
Poco M4 Pro 4g
1202
-90.85
-88.95
-87 / - 95
-88 / -98
Tcl 30 Se
567
-92.11
-92.85
-88 / -98
-99 / -93
Poco X4 Pro
562
-92.06
-94.01
-90 / -95
-95 / -93
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g
945
-93.5
-93.54
-91 / -97
-92 / -97
Poco F4 Gt
832
-95.02
-93.09
-90 / -99
-93 / -97
Oukitel Wp18
1351
-95.94
-92.92
-91 / -97
-92 / -97
Poco X4 Gt
387
-96.99
-96.505
-96 / -98
-95 / -98
Poco F4
524
-95.78
-95.04
-93 / -99
-94/-96
Oneplus Nord 2t
1340
-98.83
-96.305
-95 / -102
-90 / -99
[b][b][b][b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the download speed, I have identified some 4G cells offering good performance where I test all my devices several times to see what download and upload speed they can achieve.[b]Top 10 - snelheidsrangschikking tijdens downloaden 1. Samsung Galaxy S20 D:351Mbps U: 20Mbps 2. Poco X3 D:232Mbps U: 55Mbps 3. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g D:223Mbps U: 52Mbps 4. Poco F2 Pro D:207Mbps U: 53Mbps 5. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite D:153Mbps U: 68Mbps 6. Xiaomi Mi A3 D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps 7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps 8. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite D:149Mbps U: 60Mbps 9. Samsung Galaxy A21s D:147Mbps U: 51Mbps 10. Huawei Y6 2019 D:145Mbps U: 61Mbps
Aantal smartphones in de ranglijst:30 Positie van deze smartphone in de ranglijst:28/30
Let op: de theoretische maximale snelheid van een telefoon wordt vaak beperkt door de configuratie van het mobiele netwerk en de congestie van het netwerk op het moment van de meting. Dus misschien kun je een hogere snelheid halen op een ander netwerk [b]The Realme 6 got a good score for signal quality in 4G and I was expecting a good score in download speed but it's not the case. I got a download speed fluctuating around 60 Mbps and an upload speed fluctuating in the same area. That's half of what I got with a Redmi Note 9s in exactly the same conditions.[b][b]These speeds are more than enough for streaming or downloading but if speed is important to you, the Redmi does much better.[b][b]
[b][b][b]
Wifi performance
To test a phone's ability to receive the network properly, I take measurements near my router and then remotely (and always at the same place). This gives me an average in dBm where a value of -90 dBm indicates poorer performance than a value at -30 dBm.[b]
Wifi signal[b]The Realme 6 is in the middle range with a signal near -29 dBm and a remote signal of -73 dBm. Most of the phones I test are in this zone, only the Redmi Note 8 pro manages to outperform everyone with -19 dBm near the router.[b]
[b][b][b][b]Top 10 - rangschikking van wifi-gevoeligheid 1. Poco F2 Pro -11dBm 2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro -12dBm 3. Realme Gt -12dBm 4. Samsung Galaxy A21s -13dBm 5. Redmi Note 11 Pro -13dBm 6. Oneplus Nord N100 -15dBm 7. Poco X3 Pro -15dBm 8. Poco F3 -15dBm 9. Redmi Note 9t -15dBm 10. Black Shark 4 Pro -15dBm
Aantal smartphones in de ranglijst:66 Positie van deze smartphone in de ranglijst:55/66
[b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the speed in Wifi, I connect to my router in 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz (if available) and use the Ookla application to measure the speed.I measured a download speed of almost 200 Mbps in download and 20 in upload (upload limited by my provider). With such a speed you can use the Realme 6 for streaming without any problem.[b][b]Here too the Redmi Note 8 Pro does much better with more than 300 Mbps download speed.[b][b]
[b][b][b]Top 10 - Ranglijst van wifi-downloadsnelheden 1. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 866Mbps 2. Poco F4 866Mbps 3. Poco F4 Gt 866Mbps 4. Poco X4 Gt 866Mbps 5. Oneplus Nord 2t 866Mbps 6. Black Shark 4 Pro 866Mbps 7. Poco M4 Pro 4g 433Mbps 8. Poco X4 Pro 433Mbps 9. Redmi Note 11 Pro 433Mbps 10. Poco F3 398Mbps
Aantal smartphones in de ranglijst:64 Positie van deze smartphone in de ranglijst:37/64
Opmerking: ik heb een 400 Mbps-lijn en een modem die hogere snelheden kan leveren, maar ik weet nooit zeker hoeveel bandbreedte er beschikbaar is als ik een test doe. [b]
GPS performance
[b]To test the quality of the GPS signal I use the Offline Maps application and I make the same train trip in pedestrian mode. Why? In pedestrian mode, the GPS does not artificially correct the signal to stick to the road, it has no markings, so you can see the actual position. I then use an application to measure the accuracy of the signal. [b][b][b]The Realme 6 gets a very good accuracy score on the GPS. After a few seconds, the accuracy stabilizes at 1 meter. It picks up about 40 satellites and almost 30 of them are used for positioning.[b][b][b][b]On a road course without any difficulties (trees, tunnels,...), the Realme positions my car correctly on the road with sometimes a small deviation completely negligible. I had tested other devices at the same time and some of them placed my car off the road.[b][b][b]Top 10 - GPS-nauwkeurigheidsclassificatie 1. Oukitel C21 1m 2. Redmi 9a 1m 3. Doogee S96 Pro 1m 4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 1m 5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1m 6. Umidigi Bison Pro 1m 7. Tcl 30 Se 1m 8. Redmi 10 1m 9. Poco M4 Pro 1m 10. Poco M4 Pro 4g 1m
Aantal smartphones in de ranglijst:36 Positie van deze smartphone in de ranglijst:0/36
Opmerking: een nauwkeurigheid van 3 meter of minder kan eenvoudig worden gecorrigeerd door een goede GPS-applicatie. De telefoonprestaties spelen ook een rol bij de snelheid waarmee je scherm wordt bijgewerkt, dus de nauwkeurigheid kan in het gedrang komen door een te trage weergave. [b]
Vanaf maart 2020 heb ik mijn subjectieve batterijtest vervangen door een technische test om het werkelijke gedrag van de batterij beter te kunnen meten. Nu test ik de autonomie en de oplaadtijd onder absoluut identieke omstandigheden. Ik voer verschillende metingen uit, zodat deze test alleen al enkele dagen duurt en ik de telefoon voor niets anders kan gebruiken.
Batterijduur - methodologie Om de levensduur van de batterij te testen, meet ik het batterijverbruik elke minuut in strikt identieke omstandigheden om telefoons te kunnen vergelijken en ook om je in staat te stellen je telefoon in dezelfde omstandigheden te evalueren. Ik sluit elke invloed uit van toepassingen die de meting zouden kunnen verstoren. De autonomie is niet lineair, de batterij ontlaadt zich soms veel sneller aan het einde. Dit is een frustrerend fenomeen, maar met mijn metingen weet je of je snel een oplader moet vinden.
Batterijduur De batterij van de Realme 6 heeft een capaciteit van 4300 mAh en is ontladen van 100% tot 1% in 704.00 minuten met 100% helderheid, hij is ontladen van 100% tot 1% in 1104.00 met 50% helderheid. Op deze manier krijg ik een gemiddelde ontlaadsnelheid van 0.14% per minuut bij 100% lichtsterkte en 0.09% per minuut bij 50% lichtsterkte, het verbruik is dus 6.11 mA per minuut bij 100% lichtsterkte en 3.89 bij 50% lichtsterkte. Om de efficiëntie van de telefoon en de invloed ervan op de batterij te kunnen vergelijken, moet je de 6.11 (of 50%) score vergelijken met die van andere smartphones, het cijfer moet zo laag mogelijk zijn.
Laadtijd - methodologie Om de oplaadtijd te testen, gebruik ik altijd dezelfde lader met dezelfde kabel. Ik meet de oplaadtijd minuut voor minuut om de evolutie van de lading en de oplaadsnelheid te zien. De laadsnelheid van een batterij is niet lineair, maar vaak sneller aan het begin en langzamer aan het einde. De lader is compatibel met snel laden.
Laadtijd De accu van het Realme 6 heeft een capaciteit van 4300 mAh en is opgeladen van 1% tot 100% in 162.00 minuten. Dit geeft me een gemiddelde laadsnelheid van 0.62% per minuut en dus een toename van 26.54 mA per minuut. Om de prestaties van de Realme 6 te vergelijken met andere telefoons, moet je de 26.54 per minuut score gebruiken, deze score moet zo hoog mogelijk zijn.
In het bijzonder: de laadsnelheid is niet altijd lineair, de onderstaande grafiek geef je een indicatie van het gedrag van de batterij.
De volgende tabel geeft een overzicht van de geteste telefoons met de technische accutest, ze zijn gerangschikt in volgorde van efficiëntie. Een hogere batterijcapaciteit zou logischerwijs moeten resulteren in een hogere levensduur van de batterij, maar dat is niet altijd het geval en het geeft geen indicatie van de efficiëntie van een telefoon.
Smartphone
Capaciteit (mAh)
Levensduur (minuten)
Efficiëntiescore
Levensduur (minuten) / 50%
Efficiëntiescore / 50%
Laadtijd
.Laden score
Honor 9x
4000
770.00
5.19
1333.00
3.00
151.00
26.49
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000
565.00
7.08
1217.00
3.29
136.00
29.41
Oukitel C21
4000
497.00
8.05
1324.00
3.02
167.00
23.95
Nokia 5.3
4000
549.00
7.29
1096.00
3.65
199.00
20.10
Google Pixel 5
4080
773.00
5.28
1559.00
2.62
81.00
50.37
Umidigi A9 Pro
4150
552.00
7.52
1562.00
2.66
112.00
37.05
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g
4160
749.00
5.55
1541.00
2.70
163.00
25.52
Realme 6
4300
704.00
6.11
1104.00
3.89
162.00
26.54
Realme Gt
4500
574.00
7.84
1057.00
4.26
87.00
51.72
Tcl 10 Pro
4500
465.00
9.68
889.00
5.06
133.00
33.83
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500
652.00
6.90
1239.00
3.63
165.00
27.27
Black Shark 4 Pro
4500
425.00
10.59
937.00
4.80
29.00
155.17
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g
4500
525.00
8.57
1211
3.72
24
187.50
Poco F4
4500
554.00
8.12
1141
3.94
98
45.92
Oneplus Nord 2t
4500
693
6.49
1492
3.02
121
37.19
Poco F3
4520
657.00
6.88
1840.00
2.46
122.00
37.05
Poco F2 Pro
4700
1150.00
4.09
1536.00
3.06
180.00
26.11
Poco F4 Gt
4700
365.00
12.88
1082
4.34
38
123.68
Redmi 9c
5000
656.00
7.62
1915.00
2.61
170.00
29.41
Poco M4 Pro 4g
5000
723.00
6.92
1 500.00
3.33
77.00
64.94
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s
5000
636.00
7.86
1556.00
3.21
161.00
31.06
Poco M3 Pro
5000
657.00
7.61
1647.00
3.04
131.00
38.17
Redmi 9a
5000
694.00
7.20
1902.00
2.63
195.00
25.64
Umidigi Bison Pro
5000
610.00
8.20
1632.00
3.06
255.00
19.61
Redmi 10
5000
664.00
7.53
1684.00
2.97
165.00
30.30
Poco M4 Pro
5000
634.00
7.89
1600.00
3.13
123.00
40.65
Xiaomi 11t
5000
476.00
10.50
1204.00
4.15
97.00
51.55
Oneplus Nord N100
5000
808.00
6.19
1278.00
3.91
663.00
7.54
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
5000
691.00
7.24
1728.00
2.89
193.00
25.91
Tcl 30 Se
5000
650
7.69
1 225.00
4.08
172
29.07
Redmi Note 9t
5000
766.00
6.53
2054.00
2.43
148.00
33.78
Motorola G8 Power
5000
912.00
5.48
2792.00
1.79
311.00
16.08
Poco X4 Pro
5000
643.00
7.78
1361
3.67
74
67.57
Umidigi Bison
5000
550.00
9.09
1471.00
3.40
238.00
21.01
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000
729.00
6.86
1283.00
3.90
166.00
30.12
Redmi Note 11
5000
592.00
8.45
1 376.00
3.63
69.00
72.46
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020
625.00
8.03
1557.00
3.22
213.00
23.57
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s
5020
663.00
7.57
1876.00
2.68
224.00
22.41
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020
650.00
7.72
1808.00
2.78
162.00
30.99
Poco X4 Gt
5080
726.00
7.00
1538
3.30
113
44.96
Umidigi F2
5150
927.00
5.56
1854.00
2.78
299.00
17.22
Poco X3 Pro
5160
648.00
7.96
1688.00
3.06
138.00
37.39
Poco X3
5160
653.00
7.90
1654.00
3.12
181.00
28.51
Doogee S58 Pro
5180
845.00
6.13
1908.00
2.71
177.00
29.27
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260
827.00
6.36
1609.00
3.27
208.00
25.29
Ulefone Armor 7e
5500
768.00
7.16
1140.00
4.82
179.00
30.73
Poco M3
6000
842.00
7.13
1898.00
3.16
217.00
27.65
Doogee S96 Pro
6350
929.00
6.84
1405.00
4.52
424.00
14.98
F150 R2022
8300
879.00
9.44
1498.00
5.54
243.00
34.16
Oukitel Wp18
12500
2 733.00
4.57
2859
4.37
362
34.53
helpHoe lees je deze cijfers? De batterijcapaciteit is een belangrijk element bij het bepalen van de autonomie van een telefoon, maar het is niet de enige factor. Een telefoon met een grote batterij kan een kortere batterijduur hebben als hij meer stroom verbruikt. Als ik een voorbeeld uit het dagelijks leven zou moeten nemen, zou ik het universum van de auto gebruiken. Als een auto een grote brandstoftank heeft, zou hij een langere afstand moeten kunnen rijden, tenzij het gemiddelde brandstofverbruik hoger is. De score voor de efficiëntie van de batterij werkt op dezelfde manier, hij moet zo laag mogelijk zijn en staat voor het energieverbruik van de telefoon. Deze verschillen in efficiëntie zijn vaak gerelateerd aan de helderheid van het scherm, grote heldere schermen hebben de neiging om meer energie te verbruiken en zelfs als ze een grote batterij hebben, zal hun bereik korter zijn.
samengevat [battery product="realme-6" capa="5150" lg="en"][b]The Realme 6 offers a battery capacity in the average phone in the same price range.[b][b]It took 162 minutes to fully charge the battery. Charging is linear up to about 90%, the remaining 10% charges more slowly. The Realme 6 offers an above-average charging speed.[b][b]It took me 704 minutes to completely drain the battery. While this score is good, the Realme 6 has a lower than average energy efficiency, other phones with equivalent capacity will offer longer battery life.[b][b]The battery life is quite linear, I don't see any weakening as is often the case during this kind of measurement. The Realme 6 can recover some autonomy by switching on the energy saving mode (from 20%).[b][b]With this score the Realme 6 should give you an autonomy between 2 and 3 days under normal conditions of use.[b][b]
Photo camera test
To test the quality of photos produced by a phone, I do a technical test (resolution, sharpness, chromatic aberration,...) in studio (identical conditions) to evaluate the technical part objectively. From the second half of 2020, I built my own laboratory to take completely objective technical measurements. I then take pictures in real conditions to see how the camera performs. I then evaluate these photos according to my criteria but I publish the photos so that you can evaluate the result according to your criteria.[b]
Hardware
Selfie / resolutie : 16 Selfie / sensor : Samsung S5K3P9 Resolutie : 64 Sensor : Samsung Bright S5KGW1 Video resolutie : 2160p mm wide angle : 5.58 mm mm ultra wide angle : 1.64 mm
The Realme 6 is equipped with 4 sensors at the rear with the usual combination of a main sensor (64 Mp) accompanied by a wide angle (8 Mp), a macro sensor and a black and white depth sensor.[b][b]Realme has chosen the Samsung Bright S5KGW1 as the main sensor, this is the same sensor as the Redmi Note 8 Pro. I had tested this sensor on the Redmi and the strength of this sensor was in the sharpness of the images. The Redmi on the other hand had a tendency to make the pictures too cold, you will see that with this Realme it's the opposite.[b][b]Default app[b]It's the first time I've tested a Realme, so I was curious to see how Realme would try to be different from Xiaomi. [b][b]The default photo application looks pretty much like what Xiaomi does, Realme chose to use text instead of icons, that's a good thing, it doesn't leave room for interpretation. The application's settings are quite similar.[b][b]The application allows you to zoom up to 5x in the photo, this kind of possibility is not common and at 5x you have to hold the phone well to avoid blurred photos.[b][b]The application also detects the type of scene to adapt the settings, it will for example distinguish a landscape from a character or make the difference between the grass and the sky. It's very well designed (and very fast), I've already seen it on other phones, it's just a question of whether the Realme will be able to make the right decisions according to the situation.[b][b]Realme also offers time lapses and slow motion (120 fps and 240 fps).[b][b][b][b][b]
Photo quality
Photo test / studio[b]First example: ƒ/1.8 1/142 5.58 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b]Exposure: slightly underexposed[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: slightly too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]For this first studio test, I see that the Realme falls into the same trap as many telephones and produces underexposed photos. The Realme doesn't do too badly in the end because I've seen much worse results. The underexposure has an effect on the colors but the sharpness seems quite good, this is one of the strength of the Samsung sensor, it was the same with the Redmi Note 8 Pro.[b][b]Second example: ƒ/1.8 1/142 5.58 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b]Exposure: slightly underexposed[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: slightly too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]The X2 zoom uses the same sensor, it is a digital zoom based on a high-resolution image in which the camera zooms in artificially. To avoid too much pixelization, the Realme applies a sharpness processing that works quite well. You can clearly see the details of the car's grid as well as the Ford logo on the front grid. [b][b]Third example: ƒ/1.8 1/142 5.58 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b]Exposure: slightly underexposed[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: slightly too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]As I mentioned above, Realme offers an X5 zoom in the default application. This zoom also applies a sharpness treatment that works quite well but be careful, this picture was taken with a support, so I didn't tremble. If you take freehand pictures, you'll have to make sure you don't move around too much because if there's not enough light, you might get a blurry picture.[b][b]Fourth example: ƒ/2.3 1/253 1.64 mm ISO 112[b]
[b]Exposure: underexposed[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]The focal length of the wide angle is short, so you can capture an image with a very wide angle. The disadvantage of this kind of sensor is that it lets in less light, so the pictures are darker. I often remind it during my tests, wide angles should only be used when the light is good. On the other hand, the sharpness here is quite good, wide angles are generally less good in this area. I don't see any distortion but no object is in the periphery, so I can't see if there is any distortion.[b][b][b]Photo test / sunny[b]First example: ƒ/1.8 1/776 5.58 mm 101 ISO[b]
[b]Exposure: good[b]Sharpness: very good[b]Colours: too warm[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]I took this picture at the end of the afternoon, the light was really nice and highlighted the landscape well. The Realme judged that it was necessary to add a little bit more warmth resulting in too warm colours. It looks like a yellow filter was applied to the photo. The sharpness on the other hand is very good and apart from this problem of color temperature, the photo is quite nice. On the Redmi Note 8 Pro, the photos were too cold and on the Realme 6 the photos are too warm even though it is the same sensor. Treatment plays a big role in the final result. I had noticed while testing the photo application that the application was able to detect the type of scene and that it adapted the processing of the photo according to the type of scene, I have here an example that shows that this kind of adaptation does not always give a good result.[b][b]I took about the same picture at the same time with a Redmi Note 9s:[b]
[b]Redmi Note 9s also increases the color temperature, but at a lower level. This is a personal choice but I prefer the Redmi treatment.[b][b]Second example: ƒ/2,3 1/828 1,64 mm 113 ISO[b]
[b]Exposure: good[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colors: a little too saturated[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]The color processing of the wide-angle sensor is completely different from that of the main sensor. The picture looks much greener and more saturated. Even if the colors are a bit exaggerated, I prefer the wide angle processing. On the pictures that will follow you will be able to distinguish very clearly the pictures taken by the wide angle sensor because they follow the same trend. The sharpness of the wide angle is really good, it's quite rare.[b][b]With the Redmi Note 9s, the wide angle also produces good results:[b]
[b]The picture is much more neutral than the one taken with the Realme 6. The saturated photo of the Realme 6 is "prettier" but less correct in terms of colours.[b][b]Third example: ƒ/1,8 1/839 5,58 mm 101 ISO[b]
[b]Exposure: good[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: too warm[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]The x2 zoom uses the main sensor, so it takes over the defects of the main sensor. The colors are here too warm but the sharpness is good even if we lose a little precision compared to the image in full format.[b][b]Fourth example: ƒ/1.8 1/899 5.58 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b]Exposure: good[b]Sharpness: bad[b]Colours: too warm[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]As I wrote above, the x5 zoom is a digital zoom and with a simple division, you can quickly understand why this picture is bad. The Realme 6 is able to take pictures in 64 Mp pixels. If you use the x2 zoom, you divide the number of pixels by two and you always stay in a comfortable resolution that still doesn't affect the pixel accuracy too much. If, on the other hand, you use the x5 zoom, you divide the 64Mp by 5 and all image optimization processes lose their effectiveness. This x5 zoom should therefore only be used in good conditions and with subjects that do not require too much precision, such as the toys in my studio photos.[b][b]Does the Realme 6 produce good pictures? Yes it is capable of taking good pictures but the artificial treatment of the pictures can lead the phone to make bad choices. Samsung has a much better mastery of artificial photo processing, this is not yet the case for Realme. To avoid this kind of problem, the best solution would be to disable image processing.[b][b]
21add_a_photo
[b][b]Photo test / cloudy[b]First example: ƒ/1.8 1/1136 5.58 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b][b]Exposure: slightly underexposed[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: slightly too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]When the light is less favorable, the Realme 6 produces photos that are slightly too dark like most other phones in this price category. The exposure time could have been a little longer and the picture would have been much better. Leaving aside the exposure problem, the technical quality of the photo is rather good, the sharpness is good even far into the picture without any negative effect on the contours of the objects.[b][b]Second example: ƒ/2.3 1/2660 1.64 mm ISO 115[b]
[b][b]Exposure: underexposed[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: slightly too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]The picture taken by the wide angle is too dark and it doesn't make sense because there is a margin in the shutter speed to get a picture with the correct exposure. Most phones react in the same way whereas it would be enough to open the shutter longer, with 1/2660 the camera could easily go below 1/1000 without risking blur. It's a shame because as in the previous example, the picture has a nice potential, the level of detail in the clouds is really good.[b][b]Third example: ƒ/1.8 1/1229 5.58 mm 103 ISO[b]
[b][b]Exposure: slightly underexposed[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colours: slightly too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: none[b][b]This picture has the same qualities and defects as the first example because it is the same sensor that uses a digital zoom to get closer to the subject.[b][b]The Realme 6 is capable of producing good pictures but it makes the wrong choices in terms of exposure. This is a recurring problem on many smartphones. If you have a little patience, you could correct the problem by using the "expert" mode which allows you to increase the exposure time and adapt the color temperature.[b][b]
[b][b]Exposure: correct[b]Sharpness: bad[b]Colors: bad[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: highly visible[b][b]The Realme 6 is clearly bad for night shots, I didn't expect such a bad result for a phone that competes with the Redmi range. The digital noise is huge, the colors are not good, the halos of light go through the picture, only the exposure is more or less correct. The Realme 6 however has a night mode but the result is not good.[b][b]Second example: ƒ/2,3 1/10 1,64 mm 2361 ISO[b]
[b][b]Exposure: slightly under-exposed[b]Sharpness: medium[b]Colours: slightly too dark[b]Depth of field: good[b]Distortion: none[b]Chromatic aberration: none[b]Vignetting: none[b]Digital noise: visible[b][b]Wide-angle produces better night-time photos than the main sensor, it is usually the opposite. However, the picture quality is not good enough to compete with the Redmi range. [b][b]Here are some other photos taken in the same conditions, the result is not very good and the Realme will therefore rank below the Redmi Note 9s for the photo part.[b][b]
20add_a_photo
[b][b][b]
Video quality
Stabilisation[b][b][b]The Realme 6 does not offer very effective stabilisation, the jolts caused by walking are clearly visible whereas walking should not be a problem for a device in this price range.[b][b]Video normale conditions[b][b]The Realme 6 is capable of filming at 4k and 30 fps like most phones in this price range. Video taken in daylight is of good quality when you don't move around too much but as soon as you move, the focus is not fast enough to keep the image sharp. As with the camera, the colors are slightly too warm.[b][b]The microphone seems very sensitive to wind. There was indeed wind on the day I made the video but the wind was not very strong, yet you can hear the wind quite strongly in the video.[b][b]Overall, the result is correct but other phones like the Redmi Note 9s produce a better result.[b][b]Video low light[b][b][b]The night video with the Realme 6 is frankly very bad and in this price range it's unacceptable. The Realme is positioned as a competitor of the Redmi Note 9s, it is more expensive but at night it offers a performance far below average. The video shows a lot of digital noise, the colors are not good and the focus is not able to focus properly.[b][b]
Audio quality
To test the quality of the phone's audio output, I connect the device's audio output to a measuring tool, then play sounds on all frequencies and measure the differences between the original sound and the sound produced by the phone. In this way I measure the phone's ability to correctly reproduce all sounds.[b]
The Realme 6 is equipped with a unique speaker for music, so it doesn't offer stereo sound like a Motorola G8 Power. The sound delivered by this loudspeaker can be very high in volume and this is done at the expense of sound quality. If you reduce the volume to more or less 70-80%, the volume is still powerful and the sound quality is not too distorted. When listening subjectively, I found that the high frequencies lack a bit of finesse, the bass sounds are quite powerful but are probably limited by the size of the speaker, this problem should disappear with the test with headphones below.[b][b]Frequency Response[b]This test is intended to test the device's ability to correctly reproduce all frequencies. The white line in the middle of the graph is the ideal situation and the other colors come from tests on different phones. A deviation from the reference line indicates a deviation from the ideal situation. To see good sound at all frequencies, it is therefore necessary to get as close as possible to the reference line.
[b]When I do my technical test, I do a first test with the volume at maximum and if the result is bad, I try to find an ideal volume level to get a readable measurement on a graph. I had noticed when listening subjectively that the volume of the Realme 6 was very high, this is also the case with headphones. At maximum volume, the measurements are very bad, the frequencies go off in all directions, I've never had such an irregular graph. I tried to do the same test at 50% of the volume but I get the same result. I contacted Realme to try to figure out what the problem was but I never got an answer.[b][b]If I keep the volume at around 70%, contrary to the technical measurement, the sound is quite good. [b][b]Dynamic Range[b]This test is designed to test a phone's ability to play sounds at different volume levels. Here too, the phones must be as close as possible to the reference.
[b]I compared the Realme 6 with the Redmi Note 8 Pro and here we notice a big difference between the white curve and the blue one, this difference comes from the volume level. I had to lower the volume level on the Realme to not get unreadable curves like on the previous test. This graph shows that at this volume level, the sound follows a normal curve on all frequencies, this means that the sound quality remains more or less constant and is similar to the Redmi Note 8 Pro. If you haven't read the Redmi test, you should know that the Redmi offers good sound if you choose the right volume level, it's exactly the same with the Realme 6.[b][b]Noise Level[b]This test aims to identify if the device under test is able to reproduce sounds without too much noise. A high score indicates a low parasite rate, a lower score indicates a higher presence of parasites.[b]
[b]This latest technical test confirms what other tests have already shown, namely that if the volume is good, the Realme 6 produces a good sound without too much interference.[b][b]The Realme offers an average performance with the loudspeaker, with headphones the sound is much better and reaches a very good level that will appeal to a very large majority of users. You will just have to find the right volume so that you don't blow your ears and keep a correct sound quality. For more demanding music lovers, I recommend instead to go to some models from Samsung.[b][b]Concert recording[b]The purpose of this test is to measure the recording quality of the phone when there is a lot of ambient noise. Since I don't have the opportunity to go to a concert every time I test a phone, I simulate the noise of a concert in a closed environment.The Realme 6 does it better than the average for live audio recording, even if the sound is still distorted, it's less distorted than what I've been able to measure on other phones.[b][b]
Screen quality
To test the screen, I use a colorimetric probe that measures the color accuracy of a screen, as well as other parameters to see if a screen is able to correctly reproduce an image. I also test the brightness level to determine if the screen will be able to display an image in full sunlight.[b]
Screen grootte : 6.5 Resolutie : 1080 x 2400 Ratio : 20:9 Bescherming : Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Type : IPS LCD % oppervlakte : 84 dE wit : 6.2 dE rood : 5.2 dE groen : 4.4 dE blauw : 3.9 dE geel : 4.2 dE cyan : 5.7 dE magenta : 3.2 Contrast : 1285:1 Helderheid : 90
Colorimetry[b][b]
[b]The Realme 6 is equipped with an IPS LCD screen like most phones in this price range. I got a dE of 4.4 with the color probe, this is a pretty average result as I got a much better score with the Redmi Note 8 Pro. Fortunately the color differences are not very important and instead of having a color that pulls the results down, most colors have a similar difference.[b][b]You can lower the dE below 4 by choosing the "warm colors" option in the phone settings. This will allow you to correct the white significantly, the other colors do not vary much.[b][b][b]Top 10 - rangschikking van de beste schermen op basis van colorimetrie 1. Poco X4 Gt dE = 0.6 2. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g dE = 0.73 3. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro dE = 0.83 4. Redmi Note 11 dE = 0.91 5. Google Pixel 5 dE = 1.11 6. Realme Gt dE = 1.17 7. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite dE = 1.19 8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 dE = 1.2 9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 dE = 1.23 10. Poco M4 Pro 4g dE = 1.31
Aantal smartphones in de ranglijst:66 Positie van deze smartphone in de ranglijst:50/66
Let op: het colorimetrische verschil wordt gemeten in dE. Na drie uur zal het menselijk oog een colorimetrisch verschil waarnemen, dus de dE moet het laagst zijn. De tests zijn allemaal uitgevoerd met een colorimetrische sonde. [b]Brightness / Contrast[b]I was very surprised by the results of the brightness measurement, I made many measurements and each time I obtained a very low level of brightness. As I didn't find this normal, I contacted Realme but after a week I still had no answer, I found the solution by myself. The Realme was in power saving mode and in this mode the screen lighting is completely locked and you can't go above 100 cd/m². [b][b]The power save mode exists on other devices as well but I hadn't yet had the case of a lock on the brightness.[b][b]Without the power save mode, the screen produces a brightness of 410 cd/m², it's a good score but it's not the strongest in its category, the Redmi Note 9s goes up to almost 600 in full sunlight. With 410 cd/m², you will be able to read your screen in full sunlight but be aware that if this is an important criteria for you, there are better screens out there.[b][b] I measured a contrast ratio of 1285:1, this score puts it in the middle of the IPS screens, so the Realme 6 is neither good nor bad.[b][b]Light Absorption/Reflection[b]The smartphone screen reflect light and sometimes turn them into a real mirror. This mirror effect makes it harder to read. [b][b]The absorption index below indicates the percentage of light absorbed by the screen. The readability of a screen is better when the absorption index is high.[b][b]
Telefoon getest:
% lichtabsorptie
Samsung Galaxy S10+
58
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
52
Honor 9x
65
Redmi Note 9s
55
Motorola G8 Power
60
Realme 6
54
Umidigi F2
48
Poco F2 Pro
52
Redmi Note 9
56
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
53
Samsung Galaxy S20
47
Samsung Galaxy A21s
53
De geteste telefoons hebben een gemiddelde absorptiegraad van54 %
Biometry
The Realme 6 can be unlocked by facial recognition or a fingerprint sensor on the side of the phone.[b][b]Facial recognition is very weak because if I point the phone at the ceiling without my face visible, the phone still unlocks. However, I did recognize my face when I first set up the phone.[b][b]The fingerprint sensor on the side is less effective than a fingerprint sensor on the back, you have to find the right position to unlock the device. The idea of putting a fingerprint sensor at this location is good but still very effective.[b][b]
Operating system
[b][b]Realme is a fairly recent brand but their operating system based on Android is really successful. Overall, it looks very much like what Xiaomi is doing with MIUI. [b][b]Realme UI offers an application drawer and all the application shortcuts on the right, so Realme combines the best of both worlds. The search engine can't be moved (it's stuck at the bottom of the screen) which can sometimes be annoying with an accidental click.[b][b]The settings menu contains many options as on most Android phones, so sometimes you have to search a bit to find what you need. The search engine allows you to avoid searching for an item manually, but you must use the exact keyword because the system will not try to interpret what you are looking for.[b][b]The system is stable, I didn't encounter any problems. I just regret that Realme remained on a customization screen on the left of the main screen. Xiaomi had also made that choice and then went back to an information flow. [b][b]Realme UI is therefore a great success for such a young brand.[b][b][b]
Encoutered bugs
Not yet available / tested[b][b]
Accessories Realme 6
Om nog meer te genieten van je ervaring met je smartphone bied ik links naar allerlei accessoires die je misschien handig vindt
Ik heb voor elke test een score van 1 tot 10 toegekend die de sterke en zwakke punten van een product bepaalt. Ik gebruik 0 voor criteria die (nog) niet zijn getest. Een score van 1 tot 3 duidt op slechte prestaties (en ja, dat is ook zo), een score van 4 tot 6 duidt op gemiddelde prestaties, een score van 7 tot 8 duidt op goede prestaties en een score van 9 en 10 duidt op uitzonderlijke prestaties. . De score wordt berekend op basis van mijn metingen en als er geen metingen zijn, is het een subjectieve mening op basis van mijn ervaring.
De scores zijn niet statisch, ze veranderen in de loop van de tijd omdat de prestaties van nieuwe producten veranderen en hiermee moet rekening worden gehouden.
Realme 6
Afwerking kwaliteit
6.00
6.00
Batterijprestaties
6.00
8.00
CPU-prestaties
7.00
6.5
GPU-prestaties
7.00
6.5
Schermkwaliteit
6.00
7.00
foto kwaliteit
6.00
5.00
Video kwaliteit
6.00
5.00
Wi-Fi-prestaties
6.00
7.00
Mobiele downloadsnelheid
5.00
5.00
Gevoeligheid van het mobiele netwerk
8.00
6.00
Frequentiebereik
7.00
7.00
Geluidskwaliteit
8.00
6.00
GPS-prestaties
8.00
6.00
Besturingssysteem
7.00
8.00
Totale score
93
89
Wereldwijde ranglijst 1. Black Shark 4 Pro 114 / 140 2. Realme Gt 112.5 / 140 3. Oneplus Nord 2t 111.5 / 140 4. Poco F2 Pro 111.5 / 140 5. Samsung Galaxy S20 111 / 140 6. Poco F4 Gt 110.5 / 140 7. Google Pixel 5 109.6 / 140 8. Poco F3 108.5 / 140 9. Poco X4 Gt 108 / 140 10. Poco X3 Pro 107.5 / 140 11. Xiaomi 11t 107 / 140 12. Samsung Galaxy S10+ 107 / 140 13. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 106.5 / 140 14. Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro 106 / 140 15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 105.5 / 140 16. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 104 / 140 17. Tcl 10 Pro 104 / 140 18. Samsung Galaxy A52 104 / 140 19. Redmi Note 11 Pro 103 / 140 20. Poco X4 Pro 102.5 / 140 21. Poco M4 Pro 4g 102 / 140 22. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 102 / 140 23. Poco M4 Pro 101.5 / 140 24. Redmi Note 11 101 / 140 25. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 101 / 140 26. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 101 / 140 27. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g 101 / 140 28. Poco X3 101 / 140 29. Redmi Note 9t 100.5 / 140 30. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 100 / 140 31. Poco M3 Pro 98 / 140 32. Doogee S96 Pro 98 / 140 33. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s 98 / 140 34. Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 98 / 140 35. Redmi 10 97.5 / 140 36. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 97 / 140 37. F150 R2022 95 / 140 38. Umidigi Bison Pro 95 / 140 39. Poco M3 94.5 / 140 40. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 94 / 140 41. Realme 6 93 / 140 42. Umidigi A9 Pro 92 / 140 43. Umidigi Bison 92 / 140 44. Tcl 30 Se 92 / 140 45. Oukitel C21 89.5 / 140 46. Nokia 5.3 89 / 140 47. Xiaomi Mi A3 89 / 140 48. Motorola G8 Power 89 / 140 49. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 89 / 140 50. Oneplus Nord N100 88.5 / 140 51. Honor 9x 88 / 140 52. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 86 / 140 53. Meizu Note 9 86 / 140 54. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 85 / 140 55. Umidigi S3 Pro 83 / 140 56. Samsung Galaxy A21s 82 / 140 57. Umidigi F2 82 / 140 58. Redmi 9a 81 / 140 59. Oukitel Wp18 81 / 140 60. Ulefone Armor 7e 80 / 140 61. Redmi 9c 80 / 140 62. Doogee S58 Pro 78.5 / 140 63. Honor 8x 78 / 140 64. Umidigi F1 77 / 140 65. Huawei Y6 2019 74 / 140 66. Poco F4 68.5 / 90 67. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro 57 / 70 68. Elephone U5 0 / 0
Test / Review conclusion
I hadn't tested any Realme before testing the Realme 6 but all the reviews I had read about the previous models were pretty positive for such a young brand. Realme walks in the footsteps of Xiaomi, so the comparison is inevitable. In the end the Realme is a good surprise, it's a phone with many qualities such as performance, a 90hz screen, a good battery life, an excellent network performance. The Redmi Note 9s still gets a better overall score but the Realme represents a good alternative on some points. Choosing one or the other is a luxury issue because they are two good phones with strengths and weaknesses.[b][b]I had contacted Realme before buying because I couldn't register on their site. I received an answer the very next day, so I was positively surprised. On the other hand I contacted them twice after I bought to ask them questions about the phone because I had doubts about the screen and the sound, I got absolutely no answer! I have received a few testimonials to the same effect and I find it deplorable. I contacted Xiaomi France several times to ask them questions, I received an answer to each question and sometimes I even received an answer within an hour of the request. It has nothing to do with the quality of the phone but maybe you should buy a Realme where you'll get better support like Amazon rather than on their site.[b][b][b]Strengths[b]Screen 90hz[b]Network performance[b]Performance gaming[b]GPS Performance[b][b][b]Weaknesses[b]Catastrophic night-time photo quality[b]Colours for daytime photos[b][b][b]Alternatives to this product[b][b]The most direct competitor to Realme 6 is the Redmi Note 9s (and maybe the Redmi Note 9 Pro when it is released). The Redmi Note 9s scores slightly higher than the Realme but the choice between the two is difficult because the strengths and weaknesses are different. In order to make the right choice, you have to compare the score for the criteria that are most important to you such as network performance or the Realme is much better than the Redmi, but for example on the photo part, the Redmi scores better.[b][b]
Laurent Willen In plaats van naar onzin op tv of YouTube te kijken, besteed ik mijn tijd 's avonds aan het testen van producten en het delen van mijn passie voor technologie, reizen en fotografie.
Ik run deze site onder mijn eigen naam en volledig onafhankelijk, niemand betaalt me om dit te doen.
Ik heb meer dan 20 jaar ervaring in de digitale wereld, ik heb veel high traffic websites beheerd en ontwikkeld voor bedrijven in België zoals Mobistar, Microsoft, Immoweb, BrusselsAirlines, Proximus, Orange,...
arrow_forward
arrow_back
close
Snelkoppelingen:
close
LOADING
Prijs Realme 6
Contact Formulier
Deze blog is niet mijn hoofdactiviteit, ik ontvang meer dan 2000 e-mails per jaar die ik in mijn vrije tijd moet antwoorden. Om je te kunnen blijven helpen, kan je mij steunen door je producten te kopen via mijn links. Het kost je absoluut niets en het houdt me op de been.
Veelgestelde vragen / antwoorden: - Ik ben een freelance blogger, ik werk niet voor Amazon, Aliexpress, Gearbest, ... dus ik kan je niet helpen met je bestellingen. - Ik schrijf geen gesponsorde artikelen. - je kunt je afmelden voor notificaties met de afmeldlink in elke e-mail.
test
Welkom op mijn blog!
Mijn testen zijn gedetailleerder dan op de meeste andere sites. Ik ben volledig onafhankelijk en niemand betaalt me om een product te testen.
Als je geen tijd of zin hebt om de algemene voorwaarden te lezen, hier is een samenvatting: - Ik gebruik je gegevens niet - Ik gebruik alleen Google Analytics voor mijn statistieken - Ik heb vrijwillig externe scripts geblokkeerd die je gegevens kunnen gebruiken - Ik geef slechts één advertentie per bezoek weer en je kunt deze kiezen.
Op welke site koop je meestal?
Deze blog is volledig onafhankelijk geschreven en de inhoud ervan wordt niet beïnvloed door de adverteerders die op bepaalde pagina's aanwezig zijn. Er zijn enkele pagina's die aangesloten inkomsten genereren met bedrijven zoals Amazon, AliExpress, Gearbest en nog veel meer. Meer informaties? Raadpleeg de algemene voorwaarden
LAURENTWILLEN.BE
Laurent Willen
