Before leaving...

Thanks for your visite. If you like my work, you can support me with the following possibilities:
Subscribe to my YouTube channel
I post full test videos every month. By subscribing you will be notified of each new video, but the number of YouTube subscribers is important to obtain products to test.


Subscribe to my page on Facebook
I regularly post updates on Facebook, I also organize contests to win prizes. Here too, the number of fans is important to obtain material.


Use my links
I don't display ads on my site because I don't like it. My only source is from purchases you make from my links. I earn a meager commission on every purchase (about 2% on average), it costs you nothing and keeps me going. Here are some links to buy your products: == Aliexpress == Banggood

On this page:
Price Redmi 10
First configuration
CPU / GPU Performance
Benchmark Antutu/3DMark
Network performance
Wifi performance
GPS performance
Battery range
Photo camera test
Photo quality
Video quality
Audio quality
Screen quality
Operating system
Test / Review conclusion
Questions answers

Follow me: rss feed
Receive notifications for new articles

Redmi 10: test / review

Redmi 10: test / review
Category: Smartphones

Until a few years ago, entry-level phones from major brands (eg Samsung) were appallingly slow and offered a really limited experience. With the arrival of Xiaomi things have changed and where for 150 to 200 € you can buy a wheelbarrow from Samsung, Xiaomi offers you a bike with a nice bell. [b][b] The Redmi 10 (not to be confused with the Redmi Note 10) is an entry-level phone that could be mistaken for a mid-range phone from other manufacturers. [b][b] The Redmi 10 improves on the previous generation (Redmi 9) on many criteria. The Redmi 10 is slightly smaller and lighter without sacrificing the screen. Performance has improved slightly and for the photo, Xiaomi has integrated a Samsung sensor instead of the Omnivision sensor of the Redmi 9. Still no 5G in sight, in this price range it is rather the territory of the Poco brand. While waiting for the probable arrival of the Redmi 10A and Redmi 10C, the entry level at Xiaomi has found a new doorman.[b][b][b]linkManufacturer web site:[b]linkSite where I have bought the Redmi 10:[b]

Structure of my tests

I test the phones according to a pre-established structure (see below) to provide you with as much information as possible. Unfortunately, this takes a long time. Some tests like network performance tests take several days and for photo tests I sometimes have to wait until the weather is suitable to take pictures in good conditions. I am therefore obliged to publish the tests step by step, so I invite you to come back if the test is not complete at the time of your visit.[b]
How are my tests different from others on the web?

- I usually buy the devices with my own money, so price is just as important as you are!
- I keep the devices for at least a few weeks (sometimes more) to see what they are worth in real conditions.
- I answer (when possible) your questions to help you decide before you buy
- no one pays me to do these reviews, so I'm completely neutral and independent...
- My pages are not filled with ads

POCO F5 : test / review
Unihertz Luna : test / review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: test / review
Redmi Note 11 : test / review
Redmi Note 11 Pro test / review
Redmi 10A: test and review
POCO M5 : test, review and price
POCO X5 5G : test / review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12: test / review
Unihertz Tank : test / review

Price Redmi 10

The list below shows the prices for the Redmi 10 from more than 50 sites around the world. If you are not satisfied with any price, you can subscribe to a price alert to be the first to be notified when the price drops.[b]bb
Xiaomi Redmi A1 Smartphone, Pantalla Dot Drop de 6,52", batería de 5000 mAh, cámara de 8 MP, 2+32 ...
2023-09-24 18:40
69 EUR
Xiaomi C3S Redmi A1 Smartphone, Pantalla Dot Drop de 6.52", Batería de 5000 mAh, Cámara de 8 MP, C...
2023-09-24 18:26
77 EUR
Xiaomi Xia DS REDMI 10A 2+32 GLO GRY...
2023-09-24 15:23
83 EUR
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT 32GB Dual-SIM Smartphone grau Android 10 13MP...
2023-09-24 14:13
85 EUR
Xiaomi Redmi A1 Unlocked 4G Volte Cellphone,2GB RAM + 32GB ROM,6.52" Display, 8MP Camera,5000mAh Bat...
2023-09-24 15:33
87 EUR
Xiaomi Redmi 9A 32GB 2GB RAM Dual SIM (GSM-UNLOCKED) BLACK...
2023-09-24 14:06
87 EUR
helpThe above links are affiliate links from companies such as Amazon, Gearbest, Aliexpress,... If you appreciate my work, I would be grateful if you could purchase these products through these links. It costs you absolutely nothing but I get a small commission that allows me to buy the material I test. Thank you very much!


September 27, 2021: Redmi 10 order on (introductory offer) October 4, 2021: I received the phone, the test can begin[b]

Why this phone?

Price is a major criterion in choosing a phone, not everyone can afford an iPhone and Xiaomi understands this. I've bought almost every Xiaomi brand model this year so couldn't miss the opportunity to test out their new entry-level phone as I'm pretty sure it's going to be a hit. [b][b] When testing a lot of phones we tend to compare everything to good experiences and since the entry level cannot compete with the high end these phones receive a bad note. However, I try not to fall too much into this trap by evaluating the qualities of this kind of phone according to its selling price. I suspect that the Redmi 10 will be less powerful and produce poorer photos than the top of the range, so I'm just going to share an experience so you can pass judgment on this phone.[b]


Xiaomi boxes follow and resemble each other, impossible to distinguish one model from another. The Xiaomi industrial machine has found a format and copies it for most of its phones. It doesn't affect the quality of the phone, I just see it as an indication of brand positioning. Xiaomi is a champion of recycling, they re-use all kinds of components to decline them in countless models. [b][b] The box contains the bare minimum, namely the phone, a charger, a USB cable, a manual, a semi-transparent silicone protection and a needle to open the sim drawer. [b][b][b]
Length : 161.9
Width : 75.5
Thickness : 8.9
Weight : 181
Jack output : Yes
USB Type : Type C
Infrared port : Yes

First configuration

The Redmi 11 runs under MIUI 12.5 out of the box, it is the last version of the Xiaomi overlay which is based on Android 11. The entry level is therefore not disadvantaged compared to other Xiaomi phones . The first contact with MIUI 12.5 goes through the configuration screens which have been revamped, the interface is more graphical and more pleasant to use, Xiaomi is moving away from the basic interface offered by Android. The configuration is very simple, in 2-3 minutes max the phone is operational. [b][b] The new interface is therefore a success, but it is another opportunity for Xiaomi to try to register for its cloud and they are each time smarter to get there. Read carefully what is displayed on the screen, if you are asked to log in with your Google account or your Xiaomi account, you can skip this step otherwise with one click you will register for the Xiaomi cloud. There is nothing wrong with that but if you don't want to, don't get trapped.[b]


I had been a bit disappointed with the level of finish of the previous generation as the use of plastic was too pronounced and the back of the phone was so thin that I could feel the components of the phone with a little bit of pressure . The Redmi 10 makes a big leap forward in terms of finishes, I was really surprised when I got it in my hand the first time. The phone is still made of plastic on the back, but the plastic looks more solid. I bought the white version and the plastic on the back gives a rather successful pearlescent effect. It does not deform like the previous model and the metallic effect outline gives it a more premium character. [b][b]
On the front, the phone doesn't really have a distinctive sign, nothing looks more like a Xiaomi than another Xiaomi. However, the screen occupies 83% of the available space, the borders are visible but thin enough for entry level.
The metallic effect outline gives a more premium look to the phone, it's quite rare in this price range, this phone reminds me of the white Poco F3 I bought earlier this year. To the touch the entry-level effect is palpable but visually it is very successful.
The photo unit stands out quite strongly on the back of the phone, there is no big change here compared to the previous generation, it's a bit of a shame but it is often the case in this price range, so I won't dwell on that.
The selfie camera is housed in the form of a punch clearly visible in the middle of the screen, here too there is nothing extraordinary, it must be said that even Apple does not has still not managed to clear the top of its screen so from this point of view, the Redmi 10 is doing very well. [b][b][b]


[b]The information below comes from the Device Info HW application. The application provides detailed technical information about the tested phone. I bought the Redmi 10 in its 4Gb / 64 Gb version (white version), you will find the technical characteristics in the following screenshots. [b][b] If I had to go over the basics, I would say: [b] - 2400x1080 screen where many entry-level phones are limited [b] - accelerometer, magnetometer, gyroscope [b] - Mediatek architecture (good for GPS, Galileo support) [b] - Samsung sensor of 50 million pixels on the back [b][b]

CPU / GPU Performance

CPU : MediaTek Helio G85
GPU : Arm Mali-G52 MC2
Memory (RAM) : 4 - 6 Gb
Storage : 64 - 128 Gb
[b][b]The Redmi 10 is based on a Mediatek Helio G85 CPU, it is an entry-level processor that will offer performance to a Poco M3 or a Redmi Note 9. For the graphics part it is based on the Mali GPU G52 is a GPU found in many entry-level phones. It is not a GPU for gamers but you will be able to play simple games without problems.[b]

Benchmark Antutu/3DMark

The Redmi 10 is not intended to obtain a very high score on Antutu, I obtained a little less than 200,000 points and that places this phone at the level of the Redmi Note 9. With this level of performance, you have a sufficiently responsive phone for all everyday tasks. If you have to run big apps or want to play big games, the phone will be slower and less responsive. [b]
Antutu score : 195106
Antutu CPU : 66466
Antutu GPU : 45497
Antutu UX : 40774
Antutu Mem : 42369
[b]Top 10 - performance ranking based on Antutu
1. Poco F5 - 910362
2. Poco F4 Gt - 853016
3. Realme Gt - 811858
4. Black Shark 4 Pro - 759986
5. Poco X4 Gt - 714577
6. Oppo Find X2 Pro - 605184
7. Oneplus 8t - 595000
8. Poco F3 - 589677
9. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro - 581650
10. Oneplus 8 Pro - 579417

Number of smartphones in the ranking:155
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:83/155

Note: this ranking only contains the phones I tested as well as a few others that I added for reference.
[b]Gaming[b]To test the performance in game, I download the mobile PUBG game and evaluate the in-game experience, graphics level and depth of vision. This game is quite demanding and should help you evaluating the performance of a phone. The Antutu score makes it possible to position a phone in the ranking but does not say anything about the real in-game experience. With this video you can see that the Redmi 10 is perfectly capable of running this game in HD but the textures are degraded and the movements are not perfectly fluid. This slight degradation should not affect you if you are a casual gamer, hard core gamers will have to move towards a more powerful model.[b]

Network performance

Xiaomi has standardized the support of 4G frequencies on most models on sale, I no longer notice big differences as was the case before. The Redmi 10 covers the vast majority of 4G frequencies used in Europe (including the B28 in 700Mhz)[b]
3G frequencies : B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B8 (900)
4G frequencies : B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B20 (800), B28b (700), B28a (700), B38 (TDD 2600), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500)
NFC : Yes
Number measurements : 2141
Average signal (reference) : -94.74
Average signal (telephone) : -100.92
Average deviation reference/telephone : -6.18
Min/Max signal (reference) : -92 / -98
Min/Max signal (phone) : -99 / -101
Choose your country to check if your phone is compatible:

The frequencies displayed below will allow you to see if this phone is compatible with your operator or if you will be able to use it in the country where you are going on vacation.

Signal 4G (before december 2020)[b]The ability to pick up the network correctly is an essential element for a phone but it is only very rarely measured. To measure a phone's ability to pick up the network, I perform a large number of measurements on the same cells to be able to compare phones under similar conditions. The signal is measured in dBm, a value of -90dBm indicates a worse signal than -70dBm. These measurements are therefore taken under real conditions and not in a laboratory, they are not scientific but give a good indication of performance. [b][b]Network signal sensitivity rating
Phone tested:Average signal (dBm)Number of measurements:
Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro-881600
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5-91.305600
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite-93788
Samsung Galaxy A70-94.5111975
Nokia 5.3-94.98531
Realme 6-95.142301
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro-95.9221599
Xiaomi Mi A3-95.951000
Huawei Y6 2019-95.951199
Doogee S58 Pro-96.22856
Redmi 9a-96.481000
Meizu Note 9-96.68937
Motorola G8 Power-96.881032
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7-97.011430
Redmi 9c-97.041000
Umidigi S3 Pro-97.131200
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8-97.34879
Samsung Galaxy A21s-97.781000
Umidigi F1-97.82298
Ulefone Armor 7e-98.71000
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite-991000
Honor 9x-99.14899
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s-99.41860
Poco F2 Pro-99.81247
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9-100.791785
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g-100.881198
Poco X3-101.19821
Umidigi F2-101.47712
[b][b]Signal 4G (from December 2020)[b]I decided to change the methodology for measuring the network because I noticed that the configuration of the mobile network changes over time. This makes it more difficult to compare phones because the conditions are no longer exactly the same.[b][b]To overcome this problem, I set up a device that captures 24 hours a day about ten parameters from the mobile network (ex: cell id, rssi, rsrq, snr, frequency,...). I then place the phone next to the device for 24 to 48 hours taking the same measurements so that I can compare them. [b][b] Overview of the phones tested with this methodology[b][b]
Phone tested:MeasurementsAvg signal (reference)Avg signal (phone)Min/Max (reference)Min/Max (phone)
Samsung Galaxy S10+457-93.06-97.39-89 / -98-97 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro669-93.69-95.84-90 / -95-92 / -98
Poco F2 Pro1438-91.02-94.99-89 / -94-94 / -96
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g1645-90.77-95.02- 88 / -98-95 / -100
Poco X3821-94.89-103.19-91 / -97.7-101 / -104
Umidigi Bison2343-92.71-96.46-90 / -99-94 / -102
Oukitel C211101-92.04-94.99-90 / -97-92 / -95
Poco M31116-92.09-91.74-88 / -98-90 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro1071-90.61-94.03-88 / -94-94 / -96
Umidigi A9 Pro981-90.40-94.01-88 / -95-93 / -95
Redmi Note 9t1201-92.149-91.71-90 / -97-91 / -97
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10999-92.35-93.99-88 / -97-92 / -98
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro877-89.72-90.56- 88 / -92-89 / -95
Poco X3 Pro1876-91.45-92.91-90 / -94-90 / -96
Poco F31382-90.79-94.2-89 / -94-93 / -98
Oneplus Nord N100896-91.23-96.005-88 / - 99-96 / -99
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite2875-91.36-91.49-87 / -96-90 / -96
Samsung Galaxy A521427-89.27-93.39-87 / -98-92 / -96
Doogee S96 Pro1259-94.2-91.21-90 / -102-88 / -95
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s957-92.07-97.62-90 / -102-96 / -102
Poco M3 Pro1247-91.76-102.97-99 / -104-88 / -98
Realme Gt843-96.49-94.02-93 / -101- 92 / -96
F150 R20221002-92.4-105.1-90 / -97-98 / -110
Umidigi Bison Pro936-94.2-104.98-91 / -98-95 / -105
Redmi 102141-94.74-100.92-92 / -98-99 / -101
Tcl 10 Pro871-93.43-94.001-92 / -96-93 / -95
Poco M4 Pro570-93.71-96.78-91 / -98-95 / -99
Google Pixel 51444-91.02-97.02-90 / -94-97 / -101
Xiaomi 11t1576-92.305-92.003-90 / -96-92 / -93
Redmi Note 111223-92.5-91.32-92/-97-90 / -93
Black Shark 4 Pro2383-95.178-95.42-90 / -100-93 / -101
Redmi Note 11 Pro349-95.33-93-89 / -101-92 / -94
Poco M4 Pro 4g1202-90.85-88.95-87 / - 95-88 / -98
Tcl 30 Se567-92.11-92.85-88 / -98-99 / -93
Poco X4 Pro562-92.06-94.01-90 / -95-95 / -93
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g945-93.5-93.54-91 / -97-92 / -97
Poco F4 Gt832-95.02-93.09-90 / -99 -93 / -97
Oukitel Wp181351-95.94-92.92-91 / -97-92 / -97
Poco X4 Gt387-96.99-96.505-96 / -98-95 / -98
Poco F4524-95.78-95.04-93 / -99-94/-96
Oneplus Nord 2t1340-98.83-96.305-95 / -102-90 / -99
Redmi 10a707-89.026-97.97-87 / -91-97 / -103
Poco M5762-95.18-95.07-98 / -93-99 / -94
Unihertz Tank1426-91.21-93.97-90 / -95-89 / -96
Poco X5 5g2234-92.3-99.1-91 / -95- 100 / -98
Google Pixel 6a853-91.8-95-90 / -94-95 / -97
Redmi Note 121023-89.6-96.99-88 / -93-95 / -97
Redmi Note 12 Pro1576-91.96-94.93-89 / -96-93 / -95
Unihertz Luna1133-91.7-91.94-89 / -95-92 / -94
Poco F51321-91.69-95.05-90 / -97-94 / -97
[b][b]I performed over 2000 measurements to assess the network sensitivity of this Redmi 10. I performed more measurements than usual because I simply forgot to remove the phone from my test area. This is not a big deal, it makes the measurements even more reliable. I got an average signal of about -100 dBm, it is not a priori a very good signal but I cannot look at it in isolation and that is why I use a parallel probe to measure the quality of the network. The probe obtains a signal around -94 dBm. This signal level shows that the network was a little degraded during the test because I generally get a better signal but it also shows that the gap with the Redmi is quite large despite everything. With around 6 dBm of difference, the Redmi ranks in the low middle of the table, so it's not a phone that I recommend for people who live in a place where the network coverage is not very good.
[b][b][b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the download speed, I have identified some 4G cells offering good performance where I test all my devices several times to see what download and upload speed they can achieve.[b]Top 10 - speed ranking in download
1. Samsung Galaxy S20 D:351Mbps U: 20Mbps
2. Poco X3 D:232Mbps U: 55Mbps
3. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g D:223Mbps U: 52Mbps
4. Poco F2 Pro D:207Mbps U: 53Mbps
5. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite D:153Mbps U: 68Mbps
6. Xiaomi Mi A3 D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
8. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite D:149Mbps U: 60Mbps
9. Samsung Galaxy A21s D:147Mbps U: 51Mbps
10. Huawei Y6 2019 D:145Mbps U: 61Mbps

Number of smartphones in the ranking:30
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/30

Note: the theoretical maximum speed of a telephone is often limited by the configuration of the mobile network and the congestion of the network at the time of the measurement. So maybe you could get a higher speed on another network

Wifi performance

To test a phone's ability to receive the network properly, I take measurements near my router and then remotely (and always at the same place). This gives me an average in dBm where a value of -90 dBm indicates poorer performance than a value at -30 dBm.[b]
Wifi frequencies : 802.11a , 802.11b , 802.11g , 802.11n , 802.11n 5GHz , 802.11ac
Download speed : 300
Signal / close : -21
Signal / distant : -65
Wifi signal[b]I measured a -21dBm signal near the router and a -65dBm signal at a distance. I have tested phones with better sensitivity but this score is quite correct, it is even in the high average.[b][b]Top 10 - wifi sensitivity ranking
1. Poco F2 Pro -11dBm
2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro -12dBm
3. Realme Gt -12dBm
4. Redmi Note 12 Pro -13dBm
5. Samsung Galaxy A21s -13dBm
6. Redmi Note 11 Pro -13dBm
7. Poco F5 -14dBm
8. Oneplus Nord N100 -15dBm
9. Poco X3 Pro -15dBm
10. Poco F3 -15dBm

Number of smartphones in the ranking:74
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:43/74

[b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the speed in Wifi, I connect to my router in 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz (if available) and use the Ookla application to measure the speed.[b]Top 10 - wifi download speed ranking
1. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 866Mbps
2. Redmi Note 12 Pro 866Mbps
3. Poco F4 866Mbps
4. Google Pixel 6a 866Mbps
5. Poco F4 Gt 866Mbps
6. Poco X4 Gt 866Mbps
7. Oneplus Nord 2t 866Mbps
8. Black Shark 4 Pro 866Mbps
9. Poco F5 866Mbps
10. Poco M4 Pro 4g 433Mbps

Number of smartphones in the ranking:72
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:35/72

Note: I have a 400Mbps line and a modem capable of delivering higher speed, but I can never be sure how much bandwidth is available when doing a test.

GPS performance

[b]To test the quality of the GPS signal I use the Offline Maps application and I make the same train trip in pedestrian mode. Why? In pedestrian mode, the GPS does not artificially correct the signal to stick to the road, it has no markings, so you can see the actual position. I then use an application to measure the accuracy of the signal. The Redmi 10 runs on a Mediatek architecture which is generally more efficient at the GPS level, this is verified once again with this phone because I obtained an accuracy of 1 to 2 meters per clear sky. The Redmi 10 supports Galileo but I only detected one frequency per network, so I don't think it is dual-band.[b][b]Top 10 - GPS accuracy ranking
1. Poco M5 1m
2. Poco X4 Gt 1m
3. Unihertz Tank 1m
4. Oukitel C21 1m
5. Redmi 9a 1m
6. Redmi 10a 1m
7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 1m
8. Doogee S96 Pro 1m
9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 1m
10. Umidigi Bison Pro 1m

Number of smartphones in the ranking:44
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:11/44

Note: An accuracy of 3 meters or less can easily be corrected by a good GPS application. Phone performance also plays a role in how fast your display updates, so good accuracy could be compromised by too slow a display.

Battery range

Capacity : 5000
Fast charge : Yes
W max : 18
Range (100% brightness) : 664.00
Range (50% brightness) : 1684.00
Charging time : 165.00
Discharge speed (100%) : 0.15
Discharge score (100%) : 7.53
Discharge speed (50%) : 0.06
Discharge score (50%) : 2.97
Charging speed : 0.61
Charging score : 30.30
From March 2020, I replaced my subjective battery test with a technical test to better measure the real behaviour of the battery. Now I test the autonomy and charging time under absolutely identical conditions. I perform several measurements, so this test alone takes several days during which I cannot use the phone for anything else.

Battery life - methodology
To test the battery life, I measure the battery consumption every minute in strictly identical conditions to be able to compare phones and also to allow you to evaluate your phone in the same conditions. I rule out any influence of applications that could interfere with the measurement. The autonomy is not linear, the battery sometimes discharges much faster at the end. This is a frustrating phenomenon but with my measurements, you will know if you need to find a charger quickly.

Battery life
The battery of the Redmi 10 has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has discharged from 100% to 1% in 664.00 minutes with 100% brightness, it has discharged from 100% to 1% in 1684.00 minutes with 50% brightness. I obtain in this way an average discharge speed of 0.15% per minute with 100% luminosity and 0.06% per minute with 50% luminosity, the consumption is therefore 7.53 mA per minute with 100% luminosity and 2.97 with 50% luminosity. To be able to compare the efficiency of the phone and its influence on the battery, you have to compare the 7.53 (or 50%) score with that of other smartphones, the figure should be as low as possible.

Charging time - methodology
To test the charging time, I always use the same charger with the same cable. I measure the charging time minute by minute to see the evolution of the charge as well as the charging speed. The charging speed of a battery is not linear, it is often faster at the beginning and slower at the end. The charger is compatible with fast charging.

Charging time
The battery of the Redmi 10 has a capacity of 5000 mAh and has been charged from 1% to 100% in 165.00 minutes. This gives me an average charging speed of 0.61% per minute and therefore an increase of 30.30 mA per minute. To compare the performance of the Redmi 10 compared to other phones, you should use the 30.30 per minute score, this score should be as high as possible.

Important note: the charging speed is not always linear, the graph below gives you an indication of the battery behaviour.

The following table lists the phones tested with the technical battery test, they are ranked in order of efficiency. A higher battery capacity should logically result in a higher battery life but it is not always the case and it does not give any indication of the efficiency of a phone.

SmartphoneCapacity (mAh)Battery life (minutes)Efficiency ScoreBattery life (minutes) / 50%Efficiency Score / 50%Charging time.Score charging
Honor 9x4000770.005.191333.003.00151.0026.49
Nokia 5.34000549.007.291096.003.65199.0020.10
Samsung Galaxy S204000565.007.081217.003.29136.0029.41
Oukitel C214000497.008.051324.003.02167.0023.95
Google Pixel 54080773.005.281559.002.6281.0050.37
Umidigi A9 Pro4150552.007.521562.002.66112.0037.05
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g4160749.005.551541.002.70163.0025.52
Realme 64300704.006.111104.003.89162.0026.54
Google Pixel 6a44105348.2619352.2811139.73
Samsung Galaxy A524500652.006.901239.003.63165.0027.27
Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g4500525.008.5712113.7224187.50
Realme Gt4500574.007.841057.004.2687.0051.72
Tcl 10 Pro4500465.009.68889.005.06133.0033.83
Poco F44500554.008.1211413.949845.92
Black Shark 4 Pro4500425.0010.59937.004.8029.00155.17
Oneplus Nord 2t45006936.4914923.0212137.19
Poco F34520657.006.881840.002.46122.0037.05
Poco F4 Gt4700365.0012.8810824.3438123.68
Poco F2 Pro47001150.004.091536.003.06180.0026.11
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s5000636.007.861556.003.21161.0031.06
Poco M3 Pro5000657.007.611647.003.04131.0038.17
Poco X4 Pro5000643.007.7813613.677467.57
Umidigi Bison Pro5000610.008.201632.003.06255.0019.61
Redmi 105000664.007.531684.002.97165.0030.30
Poco M4 Pro5000634.007.891600.003.13123.0040.65
Xiaomi 11t5000476.0010.501204.004.1597.0051.55
Redmi Note 115000592.008.451 376.003.6369.0072.46
Oneplus Nord N1005000808.006.191278.003.91663.007.54
Xiaomi Redmi Note 105000691.007.241728.002.89193.0025.91
Poco X5 5g500049310.1410584.7322821.93
Motorola G8 Power5000912.005.482792.001.79311.0016.08
Redmi Note 12 Pro50006188.0912943.8612041.67
Redmi Note 1250006377.8515173.308161.73
Samsung Galaxy A21s5000729.006.861283.003.90166.0030.12
Redmi Note 9t5000766.006.532054.002.43148.0033.78
Redmi 9a5000694.007.201902.002.63195.0025.64
Redmi 9c5000656.007.621915.002.61170.0029.41
Redmi 10a50006827.3318202.7516330.67
Umidigi Bison5000550.009.091471.003.40238.0021.01
Tcl 30 Se50006507.691 225.004.0817229.07
Poco M4 Pro 4g5000723.006.921 500.003.3377.0064.94
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro5020625.008.031557.003.22213.0023.57
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s5020663.007.571876.002.68224.0022.41
Xiaomi Redmi Note 95020650.007.721808.002.78162.0030.99
Poco X4 Gt5080726.007.0015383.3011344.96
Umidigi F25150927.005.561854.002.78299.0017.22
Poco X35160653.007.901654.003.12181.0028.51
Poco X3 Pro5160648.007.961688.003.06138.0037.39
Doogee S58 Pro5180845.006.131908.002.71177.0029.27
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite5260827.006.361609.003.27208.0025.29
Ulefone Armor 7e5500768.007.161140.004.82179.0030.73
Poco M36000842.007.131898.003.16217.0027.65
Doogee S96 Pro6350929.006.841405.004.52424.0014.98
F150 R20228300879.009.441498.005.54243.0034.16
Oukitel Wp18125002 733.004.5728594.3736234.53

helpHow to read these figures?
The battery capacity is an important element in determining the autonomy of a phone but it is not the only factor. A phone with a large battery may have a shorter battery life if it consumes more power. If I had to take an example from everyday life, I would use the universe of the car. If a car has a large fuel tank, it should be able to drive a longer distance unless its average fuel consumption is higher. The battery efficiency score works the same way, it should be as low as possible and represents the energy consumption of the phone. These differences in efficiency are often related to the brightness of the screen, large bright screens will tend to consume more energy and even if they have a large battery, their range will be shorter.

In summary I loaded the Redmi 10 from 0 to 100% in 165 minutes, it is an average loading speed but I noticed a strong slowdown on the last 20 percent and it can be seen strongly on the following graph.
I reach 20% in 20 minutes then 40% in 48 minutes but it takes more than 60 minutes for the last 20 percent. It is not advisable to charge your phone with a full cycle anyway and this phone is quite slow towards the end, it will probably give you a good reason to charge it up to 80%. [b][b] I got a runtime of 664 minutes with the screen brightness at 100% and 1684 minutes with the brightness at 50%. The phone's energy efficiency at 100% is average, so the battery life is good and will give you 2-3 days of battery life in normal use if you find your balance between 50 and 100% brightness. The screen isn't overly bright at 100% but 2.5x better battery life at 50%, so you'll have to find the balance that's best for you.

Photo camera test

To test the quality of photos produced by a phone, I do a technical test (resolution, sharpness, chromatic aberration,...) in studio (identical conditions) to evaluate the technical part objectively. From the second half of 2020, I built my own laboratory to take completely objective technical measurements. I then take pictures in real conditions to see how the camera performs. I then evaluate these photos according to my criteria but I publish the photos so that you can evaluate the result according to your criteria.[b]


Selfie / resolution : 8
Resolution : 50
Sensor : Samsung S5KJN1
The Redmi 10 is equipped with a Samsung S5KJN1 main sensor, it is an entry-level sensor that I have not yet had the opportunity to test on another smartphone. It is currently only available on the Redmi 10 and Realme Narzo 50A (only for India). The ultra wide angle sensor is a Sony IMX 355 that I have had the opportunity to test many times, it also has a portrait sensor of 2 million pixels and an anecdotal macro sensor of 2 million pixels. [b][b] It can shoot in 4k 30 fps and can also shoot in slow motion at 120 fps.[b]Default app[b]The default app is exactly the same as on the other Xiaomi launched this year. The interface has been simplified with MIUI 12 and that's a good thing, it is still possible to dig into the options but they no longer clutter the screen as before. I noticed a little hesitation in focusing where the focus is instantaneous.[b][b]

Photo quality

Photo test / studio[b] Main sensor: Samsung S5KJN1
Photos taken under artificial light often result in underexposed photos and I have to resort to pro / manual mode to increase the shooting time. exhibition as in the photo above. This photo shows that this sensor is able to produce well-exposed photos if asked, but on the other hand in manual mode, the underexposure is clearly visible. I was quite surprised to find good sharpness in the center of the image, the area of sharpness is not very large on the central area this sharpness is good. I notice a presence of digital noise, it has been a long time since I had seen it on daytime photos, the ISO level was however low. The colors are too dark due to the underexposure, the colorimetry test will allow to see if this sensor reproduces the colors correctly. [b][b] The AI mode does not seem to take too much liberty with the colors and I do not see a very spectacular effect at the HDR level, it may be better seen in photos taken outdoors.
This more technical photo makes it possible to verify that the sharpness is rather good. The level of detail is good in the center and it does not degrade too much on the periphery even if there is a slight degradation. The colors seem quite natural to me even if the underexposure plays a role here. Ultra-wide-angle sensor: Sony IMX 355
The ultra-wide-angle sensor is not designed for taking close-up shots because the distortion is severe. The photo is a little more underexposed than the main sensor and the sharpness is also less good than among the sensors of this type the Sony IMX 355 does quite well. This sensor is also used in a lot of mid-range phones, I'm amazed to find it on an entry-level phone.
If you compare this photo to the previous one, you will quickly notice the differences. The sharpness is much worse and also degrades more strongly on the periphery. The facial features of the Canadian banknote are already blurry, the details of the Hungarian banknote are lost in a soup of pixels. This kind of sensor usually doesn't produce very good photos, I wasn't expecting anything else. The colors on the other hand are a little more saturated than what I have seen on other sensors of this kind. [b][b]Photo test / sunny[b]
The brightness was not excellent for my test outdoors but it does highlight the strengths and weaknesses of this phone. The main sensor produces photos with good sharpness in the center but this sharpness degrades at the edges, which can be seen in the foliage. The colors are quite dark, the photos are a bit underexposed and the dynamic range is not very wide as I quickly found myself with a completely white sky. Using HDR alleviates the problem a bit but at the risk of getting very unnatural photos, there are some examples of HDR in the following series of photos, the result is not always very good, same for using AI. The wide-angle sensor does a bit better when it comes to colors, but the Redmi 10 is clearly not a photo champion, it's an entry-level phone that produces fairly average photos. [b][b] [b][b] Technical test For my technical tests, I test the following criteria: sharpness at center, edge sharpness, color fidelity, chromatic aberration and dynamic range. These tests are carried out in a controlled environment to allow a comparison between the different phones tested. [b][b] Sharpness [b] For the main sensor, I get a good sharpness in the center (neither too much nor too little) and a sharpness up to 3 times worse near the edges . For the secondary sensor, the sharpness in the center is not very good, it more or less corresponds to the sharpness of the edges of the main sensor. The secondary sensor is about 3 times less sharp than the main sensor. [b][b] Colorimetry [b] I got a dE of 12.83 for the main sensor and a dE of 10.11 with the secondary sensor. These are significant differences which will result in a deviation on certain colors. I notice here that the secondary sensor offers more faithful colors than the main one. These (dE) scores may seem high because the human eye can see a color difference from a dE of 3 but the best phones I have tested have a dE between 8 and 9, this Redmi's score isn't so is not too bad. [b][b] Dynamic range [b] Dynamic range allows you to capture dark and bright areas without losing information. The main sensor has a dynamic range a little below average, it is the same for the secondary sensor. In outdoor photos, this can be seen because you can barely make out the cloud texture when the light is not good enough. [b][b] Chromatic aberration [b] I detected the presence of chromatic aberrations on both sensors but the impact was quite limited.[b][b]Photo test / cloudy[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]Test photo / night[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b][b]

Video quality

Stabilisation[b] Video stabilization works quickly on entry-level phones, and the Redmi 10 is no exception. The phone does not absorb the jolts caused by my steps, the result is not catastrophic, but each step is clearly visible.[b]Video normale conditions The Redmi 10 is capable of producing 1080p videos at 30 frames per second, the Redmi Note range usually allows producing 4k videos. As the videos are produced with the same sensor as the one tested for the photo, we also find the same defects but I would say here that the sharpness is less good, it sometimes seems very forced but this is done to the detriment of the image quality . The fact that the video is in 1080p also plays a role if you are watching your videos on a PC screen which has a resolution higher than 1080p. The videos produced by the Redmi 10 are therefore of fairly average quality but in this price range, it is quite common.[b]Video low light[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]

Audio quality

To test the quality of the phone's audio output, I connect the device's audio output to a measuring tool, then play sounds on all frequencies and measure the differences between the original sound and the sound produced by the phone. In this way I measure the phone's ability to correctly reproduce all sounds.[b]
Frequency Respons : +0.02 / -0.19
Noise Level : -92.9
Dynamic Range : 92.8
THD : 0.00114
Intermodulation : 0.013
Stereo crosstalk : -86
Frequency Response[b]This test is intended to test the device's ability to correctly reproduce all frequencies. The white line in the middle of the graph is the ideal situation and the other colors come from tests on different phones. A deviation from the reference line indicates a deviation from the ideal situation. To see good sound at all frequencies, it is therefore necessary to get as close as possible to the reference line.
The sound produced by the headphones is of better quality than that produced by the speakers. The Redmi 10 is able to reproduce most frequencies fairly faithfully, it deviates just a bit from the benchmark on high tones. With the headphones, the sound is more faithful in the bass sounds than in the treble, it's a bit the opposite of what I have seen with the speakers but it's quite normal and common.[b]Dynamic Range[b]This test is designed to test a phone's ability to play sounds at different volume levels. Here too, the phones must be as close as possible to the reference.
The sound produced by the headphones is quite powerful and does not present a significant problem of distortion. I compared the Redmi 10 with the Umidigi Bison Pro because I was testing them at the same time, I got very similar results.[b]Noise Level[b]This test aims to identify if the device under test is able to reproduce sounds without too much noise. A high score indicates a low parasite rate, a lower score indicates a higher presence of parasites.
I did not notice any interference in the sound, the values are quite close to the norm.[b]

Screen quality

To test the screen, I use a colorimetric probe that measures the color accuracy of a screen, as well as other parameters to see if a screen is able to correctly reproduce an image. I also test the brightness level to determine if the screen will be able to display an image in full sunlight.[b]
Screen size : 6.5
Resolution : 1080 x 2400
Ratio : 19.5:9
Type : LCD IPS
% occupancy : 83
dE white : 5.3
dE red : 1.2
dE green : 1.8
dE blue : 1.4
dE jaune : 0.9
dE cyan : 3.4
dE magenta : 1.5
White temperature : 6628
Contrast : 1278:1
Brightness : 370
I got a dE of 2.2 using the standard color mode of the Redmi 10. By default the phone uses the "vivid color" mode which raises the dE above 5. The "vivid color mode" "may give the impression that the image is better because the saturation is sometimes exaggerated but from a colorimetric point of view, it is the standard world which offers the best result and with 2.2 the Redmi 10 ranks in the good average of the rank. [b][b] The temperature of the white is 6628K, it is a value quite close to the standard, the white is therefore very white and not bluish like on some phones.[b][b]Top 10 - ranking of the best screens by colorimetry
1. Poco X4 Gt dE = 0.6
2. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g dE = 0.73
3. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro dE = 0.83
4. Redmi Note 11 dE = 0.91
5. Redmi Note 12 Pro dE = 0.97
6. Google Pixel 6a dE = 1.01
7. Google Pixel 5 dE = 1.11
8. Realme Gt dE = 1.17
9. Redmi Note 12 dE = 1.17
10. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite dE = 1.19

Number of smartphones in the ranking:75
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:37/75

Note: the colorimetric difference is measured in dE. After three, the human eye will perceive a colorimetric difference, so the dE should be the lowest. The tests were all carried out with a colorimetric probe.
[b]Brightness / Contrast[b]I measured a brightness of 372 cd / m² by flooding the front sensor with light and I find this measurement strange as Xiaomi displays are generally brighter. I tried varying the light input in case the light sensor was positioned otherwise but failed to get more. This brightness is sufficient for use at home or in a covered place, but in direct sunlight, the screen will not be easily read. [b][b] I measured a contrast of 1278: 1, it is an average contrast for this kind of screen type. If you are used to using an LCD type screen, you will not find any problems. On the other hand, if you come from an Amoled screen, the low contrast will be very noticeable.[b]


Not yet available / tested[b][b]

Operating system

[b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]

Encoutered bugs

Not yet available / tested[b][b]

Accessories Redmi 10

To better enjoy your experience with your smartphone, I offer links to all kinds of accessories that you might find useful

Protective cover / case redmi 10
Screen protection film redmi 10
Memory card redmi 10
USB Cable / Charger redmi 10
Headphones redmi 10
Bike rack redmi 10

Compare Redmi 10 with the others

I assigned a score of 1 to 10 for each test that determines the strengths and weaknesses of a product. I am using 0 for criteria that have not (yet) been tested. A score of 1 to 3 indicates poor performance (and yes, it does), a score of 4 to 6 indicates average performance, a score of 7 to 8 indicates good performance, and a score of 9 and 10 indicates exceptional performance. .
The score is calculated based on my measurements and when there are no measurements, it is a subjective opinion based on my experience.

The scores are not static, they change over time because the performance of new products changes and this must be taken into account.

Redmi 10
Finish quality7.56.00
Battery performance7.008.00
CPU performance6.56.5
GPU performance6.56.5
Screen quality7.007.00
Photo quality6.505.00
Video quality6.505.00
Wi-Fi performance7.007.00
Mobile download speed7.005.00
Mobile network sensitivity6.006.00
Frequency coverage7.007.00
Audio quality7.006.00
GPS performance8.006.00
Operating system8.008.00
Overall score97.589
Global ranking
1. Black Shark 4 Pro 114 / 140
2. Realme Gt 112.5 / 140
3. Poco F2 Pro 111.5 / 140
4. Oneplus Nord 2t 111.5 / 140
5. Poco F5 111 / 140
6. Samsung Galaxy S20 111 / 140
7. Poco F4 Gt 110.5 / 140
8. Google Pixel 5 109.6 / 140
9. Poco F3 108.5 / 140
10. Poco X4 Gt 108 / 140
11. Google Pixel 6a 108 / 140
12. Poco X3 Pro 107.5 / 140
13. Samsung Galaxy S10+ 107 / 140
14. Xiaomi 11t 107 / 140
15. Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus 5g 106.5 / 140
16. Redmi Note 12 Pro 106 / 140
17. Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro 106 / 140
18. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 105.5 / 140
19. Samsung Galaxy A52 104 / 140
20. Tcl 10 Pro 104 / 140
21. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 104 / 140
22. Redmi Note 11 Pro 103 / 140
23. Poco X4 Pro 102.5 / 140
24. Poco M4 Pro 4g 102 / 140
25. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 102 / 140
26. Poco M4 Pro 101.5 / 140
27. Unihertz Luna 101.5 / 140
28. Redmi Note 11 101 / 140
29. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g 101 / 140
30. Poco X3 101 / 140
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 101 / 140
32. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 101 / 140
33. Redmi Note 9t 100.5 / 140
34. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 100 / 140
35. Unihertz Tank 99 / 140
36. Poco X5 5g 98.5 / 140
37. Poco M5 98.5 / 140
38. Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 98 / 140
39. Doogee S96 Pro 98 / 140
40. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s 98 / 140
41. Poco F4 98 / 130
42. Poco M3 Pro 98 / 140
43. Redmi 10 97.5 / 140
44. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 97 / 140
45. Redmi Note 12 95.5 / 140
46. Umidigi Bison Pro 95 / 140
47. F150 R2022 95 / 140
48. Poco M3 94.5 / 140
49. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 94 / 140
50. Realme 6 93 / 140
51. Umidigi A9 Pro 92 / 140
52. Umidigi Bison 92 / 140
53. Tcl 30 Se 92 / 140
54. Oukitel C21 89.5 / 140
55. Motorola G8 Power 89 / 140
56. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 89 / 140
57. Nokia 5.3 89 / 140
58. Xiaomi Mi A3 89 / 140
59. Oneplus Nord N100 88.5 / 140
60. Honor 9x 88 / 140
61. Redmi 10a 88 / 140
62. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 86 / 140
63. Meizu Note 9 86 / 140
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 85 / 140
65. Umidigi S3 Pro 83 / 140
66. Umidigi F2 82 / 140
67. Samsung Galaxy A21s 82 / 140
68. Redmi 9a 81 / 140
69. Oukitel Wp18 81 / 140
70. Redmi 9c 80 / 140
71. Ulefone Armor 7e 80 / 140
72. Doogee S58 Pro 78.5 / 140
73. Honor 8x 78 / 140
74. Umidigi F1 77 / 140
75. Huawei Y6 2019 74 / 140
76. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro 57 / 70
77. Samsung Galaxy S23 8 / 10
78. Elephone U5 0 / 0

Test / Review conclusion

[b]I still have to publish some results but in order not to make you wait, I will already write the conclusion. The Redmi 10 is an entry-level phone, if you keep this point in mind, the rest of the conclusion will make more sense to you. [b][b] The first thing that surprised me with this phone is its finish because even if this phone is mostly made of plastic, the level of finish is above what Xiaomi has the used to produce for its entry-level phones. I bought the white version and find this phone to be quite stylish. Its photo block may be a bit too much on the back but it's the same for most phones in this price range [b][b] This Redmi 10 is not a champion in anything at all, but I can't really find fault with it. The quality of the photos and videos is average, the sensitivity to the network is average, the wifi speed is average, the performance is average, the sound quality is good, only the GPS stands out from the average with an accuracy level of 1 meter. [b][b] Xiaomi has mastered the production of phones with good value for money and therefore when the price drops, Xiaomi uses average components but still manages to stay ahead of most of the others phones in the same price range. The Redmi 10 offers performance comparable to a Samsung Galaxy A32 by costing 100 € less and it is especially at Xiaomi that you have to find competitors. Phone prices have gone up considerably in recent months and a phone like the Redmi Note 10 that I bought for € 150 now costs € 100 more. This frees up the competition for the Redmi 10 a bit for those who don't want to pay more than 200 € but if you are willing to pay a little more I would recommend the Redmi Note 10 which is a much more balanced phone over just about all. the points tested on my site.[b]Strengths[b]GPS accuracy [b] Battery life (with screen at 50%) [b] Finish [b] WiFi fast enough for streaming [b] Screen [b][b][b]Weaknesses[b]Average photo / video quality [b] Screen brightness not [b] Average 4G network sensitivity [b][b][b]Alternatives to this product[b][b]Not yet available / tested[b][b]

laurent willen Laurent Willen
Instead of watching nonsense on TV or YouTube, I spend my time in the evenings testing products and sharing my passion for technology, travel and photography.

I run this site in my own name and completely independently, no one pays me to do so.

I have more than 20 years of experience in the digital world, I have managed and developed many high traffic websites in companies in Belgium such as Mobistar, Microsoft, Immoweb, BrusselsAirlines, Proximus, Orange,...


Join the discussion / Ask your questions

Your comment will be published after validation. I respond to over 1500 comments a year in my spare time, so I can't always respond very quickly. Your email address will not be publicly visible and it will not be used for commercial purposes.

Be notified by email when a response is published